Actions of three ex-railway employees caused Lac-Megantic disaster: Crown

SHERBROOKE, QUE. — Train driver Thomas Harding knows he’s partly responsible for the Lac-Megantic rail disaster that killed 47 people, but he did what he was told to do and the tragedy flowed from bad company policy, his lawyer said Monday on the first day of trial.

“Mr. Harding realizes he’s partly responsible for a very serious tragedy and that weighs on him a lot more heavily than the trial,” his lawyer Thomas Walsh told reporters.

“Is human error criminal negligence? That’s what this case is about.”

Harding and two other exrailway employees, traffic controller Richard Labrie and manager of train operations Jean Demaitre, all face one count of criminal negligence causing the death of 47 people. All have pleaded not guilty.

Crown prosecutor Veronique Beauchamp told the 14-member jury in her opening statement that if it wasn’t for the negligent actions and omission of the three accused, the deaths of 47 people in Lac-Megantic would not have happened.

The oil-laden locomotive weighing more than 10,000 tonnes was not properly secured the night of July 5, 2013, leaving it resting precariously on a slope, 10 kilometres away from downtown Lac-Megantic, Beauchamp told the court.

A fire broke out on the train about 30 minutes after Harding left for the night.

Around 1 a.m. on July 6, 2013, roughly one hour after firefighters put out the flames and turned off one of the engines, the train began moving, picking up speed and barrelling into the town.

All three men, due to their job descriptions, were responsible to ensure the train was safe, Beauchamp said.

“Evidence presented will show that beyond a reasonable doubt, all three were criminally negligent ... they contributed to the deaths of the 47 victims,” she said.

“You’ll see that the number of brakes applied to the (train) were clearly insufficient,” Beauchamp added.

She said one of the accused, supervisor Demaitre, was even told of the train’s mechanical deficiencies before the derailment.

“Our position is that Harding has a degree of responsibility but that doesn’t amount to criminal negligence,” Walsh said.

“He did what he was told to do. Most of what he did was company policy.

That was the situation from which the tragedy flowed,” Walsh said.

The Crown has signalled it will call 24 civilian and 11 police witnesses..