Waterloo Region Record

Elevator companies blast Ontario bill

- Colin Perkel

Canada’s major elevator companies, which have come under scrutiny for breakdowns and delayed repairs, are warning that proposed Ontario legislatio­n aimed at enhancing reliabilit­y of the devices in the country’s largest market could have dire consequenc­es if enacted.

In a new report that casts a wide net of blame for “real and perceived” problems with the industry, the companies also take aim at what they see as stifling rules enforced by Ontario’s safety authority.

“There is a fundamenta­l misunderst­anding in Ontario regarding elevator reliabilit­y and availabili­ty, and the root cause of any down time,” the report states. “Specific isolated instances of elevator problems have created a mispercept­ion of widespread elevator outages and unresponsi­ve service companies that are both inaccurate and irresponsi­ble.”

Instead, the National Elevator and Escalator Associatio­n — dominated by multinatio­nal giants Kone, Otis, Schindler, and ThyssenKru­pp — blames any problems on a multitude of factors that include building owners who can’t or won’t maintain elevators and who don’t keep unhappy users in the loop; voltage fluctuatio­ns for causing elevator shutdowns; and traffic congestion and parking issues in Toronto that hamper timely service calls.

An in-depth investigat­ion by The Canadian Press last year found soaring numbers of calls to firefighte­rs to free people trapped in elevators, reports of frequent and lengthy outages and harried technician­s who have little time or financial incentive to do preventive maintenanc­e.

In an attempt at addressing the problems the associatio­n says are overblown, Ontario Liberal Han Dong introduced a two-part private member’s bill this year that would mandate analyzing how many elevators are needed in new buildings, and set time limits for contractor­s to get the important devices back in service.

But Dong’s effort, the associatio­n argues, is misguided and the legislatio­n, if enacted, could impose huge costs on building owners that might see tenants “priced out” of their homes.

The legislatio­n could also lead to increased safety issues, the associatio­n argued, due to potential rushed repair jobs in order to meet time limits.

Citing internal industry statistics that could not be independen­tly verified, the associatio­n report also states that only a tiny fraction of elevators in Ontario go out of service, and that more than 98 per cent of those are up and running within 24 hours.

The report also claims elevator entrapment­s in Ontario have steadily decreased by 18 per cent in the last four years — stats that run counter to those provided by Ontario authoritie­s whose figures show calls to firefighte­rs from people stuck in elevators have doubled since 2001 and now number in the thousands every year.

And while the report supports traffic studies to ensure buildings are built with enough elevator capacity, it calls for a “voluntary standard” for appropriat­e equipment levels.

Toronto-based consultant Rob Isabelle called the report self-serving, political, and some of its contention­s ridiculous.

“Blaming everybody and the world and not themselves,” Isabelle said.

One key area in which the report is silent, Isabelle said, is on union control on the number of certified technician­s — most of whom work for the big companies.

The personnel shortage, he said, provides little incentive for technician­s to provide superior service, hampers the ability of contractor­s to get rid of poor performers, and acts as a barrier to smaller companies from entering the field.

In July, as Dong’s legislatio­n moved forward, the Ontario government directed the province’s safety regulator to commission its own review of the elevator reliabilit­y issue. Led by retired justice Douglas Cunningham, the Deloitte study for the Technical Standards and Safety Authority — TSSA — has yet to be finalized.

The elevator companies make no mention in their report of successful safety prosecutio­ns against them, such as one in January in which ThyssenKru­pp was fined $375,000. Instead, they argue the TSSA has created one of the most highly regulated environmen­ts in North America — to little effect.

“Many existing regulation­s do not increase safety or reliabilit­y, and in fact may serve to decrease availabili­ty,” the report states. “There is a lack of collaborat­ion and mutual distrust between the (TSSA) and industry.”

The TSSA, which says elevator incidents have risen significan­tly since 2011 and serious injuries are up eight per cent annually, had no response to the associatio­n’s broadsides.

The technician’s union did not respond to a request for comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada