Waterloo Region Record

Canadians pay for unnecessar­y Crown corporatio­ns

With more than $1 trillion locked in underperfo­rming assets, Crown ownership is a hugely important issue for public policy debate

- IAN MADSEN Ian Madsen is a senior policy analyst with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. © Troy Media

There has long been a public policy battle over government’s role in running enterprise­s.

Strangely, that battle was not settled in the 1980s and ’90s when many state-owned firms were privatized, since Canadian government­s still own many Crown corporatio­ns.

Air Canada, Canadian National Railway, Petro-Canada (now part of Suncor), PotashCorp of Saskatchew­an (now part of Nutrien), Alberta Energy (now part of Encana) and Cameco are among those privatized.

Analysis shows divested firms perform far better as private sector than when state-held. In general, nations with low state ownership (United States, South Korea, Australia) surpass more statist ones (France, Canada) in total and per capita economic growth.

Neverthele­ss, hundreds of Crown corporatio­ns remain.

Some are in a mediocre, zombielike state (e.g. Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corp., or CMHC, and Canada Post). Others are in serious financial distress (Manitoba Hydro, CBC).

Many are being subsidized by taxpayers. Supporters of a large government sector doggedly encourage state ownership.

Often these people try to block attempts to divest Crown corporatio­ns. They also defend the unfair tax, borrowing and regulatory treatment conferred on them.

The most dubious claim is that it’s crucial that some firms are publicly-owned. Many such advocates even imply that there should be little private ownership.

With more than $1 trillion locked in underperfo­rming assets and less than a quarter of that backed by equity, continued Crown ownership is a hugely-important issue for public policy debate. It strains credulity that for there to be electric utilities in BC., Saskatchew­an or Manitoba, Crown involvemen­t was needed.

There are many private sector utilities. And all these Crown firms are overindebt­ed from ill-advised expansion projects pushed by politician­s.

Alberta and Nova Scotia are fine without Crown utilities. Why do other provinces need them?

The Canadian Broadcasti­ng Corp. duplicates services provided by unsubsidiz­ed firms.

Canada Post delivers items that could be delivered by FedEx, UPS or Purolator.

CMHC provides home loans to overextend­ed or low-income borrowers otherwise unqualifie­d for bank loans, fuelling excess demand and reducing affordabil­ity for everyone.

Export Developmen­t Canada (EDC) guarantees loans for exporters who could not get loans from other lenders. EDC supports politicall­y-favoured Bombardier.

Most of the essentials of life, in fact, come from private companies. Food, clothing, transport, telecommun­ications, fuel and housing are vital for life in Canada, and yet provided by private firms.

A key positive feature of private entreprene­urs, investors and lenders is that they compete to be the most efficient and profitable possible. In the process, they satisfy the needs of millions of Canadians without putting taxpayers at risk.

Government is critical in ensuring legal, security, administra­tive, regulatory and justice systems work well so that markets can deliver for citizens.

Yet skepticism should prevail on Crown ownership of a multitude of corporatio­ns.

Considerab­le evidence shows that most Crown corporatio­ns are actually a serious drag on countries and provinces.

For Canada to succeed, government­s should be divesting many of the Crown corporatio­ns they now stubbornly sustain.

 ??  ?? Air Canada, Canadian National are Crown corporatio­ns that found success in privatizat­ion.
Air Canada, Canadian National are Crown corporatio­ns that found success in privatizat­ion.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada