Waterloo Region Record

Ottawa ‘concerned’ Netsweeper is used to censor web

Internet watchdog says tech produced in Waterloo is used by oppressive regimes to block access to LGBTI content

- TERRY PENDER Waterloo Region Record tpender@therecord.com Twitter: @PenderReco­rd

WATERLOO — Global Affairs Canada is concerned about reports that internet filtering technology developed by Waterlooba­sed Netsweeper Inc. is used by oppressive government­s to prevent access to websites with LGBTI content.

“Canada condemns all forms of violence against LGBTI persons, including in digital contexts,” John Babcock, a spokespers­on for Global Affairs Canada, said in an email.

“Discrimina­tion and violence against LGTBI persons in the digital context constitute­s an attack on their human rights, including the right to non-discrimina­tion, freedom of expression and privacy.”

Citizen Lab, a University of Toronto-based internet watchdog, issued a report earlier this year that detailed how Netsweeper technology is used to prevent access to websites with LGBTIrelat­ed content by several authoritar­ian government­s overseas.

As Canada was hosting an internatio­nal conference earlier this week dedicated to protecting and enhancing LGBTI rights around the world, Citizen Lab director Ron Deibert repeated his calls for tighter controls around the export of such technology.

When Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland was asked for comment, Babcock responded with an email saying: “Canada is concerned by allegation­s of the misuse of Canadian-made technology, including reports of its use in inappropri­ately preventing free access to the internet.”

He added Canada is committed to controllin­g the export of such technology, and will continue to engage with internatio­nal partners to review and control it. Deibert is not impressed. “Why does the Canadian government need to consult with its internatio­nal partners instead of taking action now, domestical­ly, and implementi­ng some kind of regulation around the export of this technology?” said Deibert.

The federal government’s actions on human rights lack consistenc­y, he said, noting how Freeland sparked a diplomatic brouhaha with Saudi Arabia after she took to social media to protest the Arab country’s detention of human rights activists.

“The criticism of Saudi Arabia on women’s rights is encouragin­g,” said Deibert. “How can Canada at the same time justify supporting a Canadian company whose technology is helping facilitate human rights violations abroad?”

The Vancouver conference, which ended Aug. 7, was called Leaving No One Behind: The Equal Rights Coalition Global Conference on LGBTI Human Rights and Inclusive Developmen­t. The coalition includes 39 countries, and Canada is a cochair of the internatio­nal organizati­on.

“The promotion and protection of human rights and democracy is a priority for our government,” Babcock said in his email. “We strongly support democracy and the right to freedom of expression, including an open internet. Canada believes that all individual­s, including LGBTI persons, should be able to harness the positive potential digital technologi­es have to offer.”

Deibert said Ottawa’s position lacks consistenc­y. Citizen Lab found that Netsweeper technology is being used to block access in 10 countries to a wide range of digital content protected by internatio­nal agreements, including religious content in Bahrain, political campaigns in the United Arab Emirates and media websites in Yemen, says the Citizen Lab report called Planet Netsweeper. Citizen Lab studied the use of Netsweeper technology in Afghanista­n, Bahrain, India, Kuwait, Pakistan, Qatar, Somalia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.

“We identified a pattern of mischaract­erization and/or overt blocking involving the use of Netsweeper’s systems that may have serious human rights implicatio­ns, including blocking Google searches for keywords related to LGBTQ identities,” says the watchdog’s report.

“The internatio­nal deployment of this Canadian-made filtering technology raises a number of human rights, corporate social responsibi­lity and public policy concerns and questions,” says the report. “These questions include whether and to what degree Netsweeper undertakes due diligence with respect to sales of its technology to jurisdicti­ons with problemati­c rights records, and whether the Canadian government should be assisting Netsweeper, financiall­y or otherwise, when its systems are used in a manner that negatively impacts internatio­nally recognized human rights.”

Netsweeper has not responded to requests for comment.

“How can Canada ... justify supporting a Canadian company whose technology is helping facilitate human rights violations abroad?”

RON DEIBERT

Director, Citizen Lab

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada