In an inclusive society, parents’ views worthy

Re: Parent consultations on sex-ed: thanks, but I’ll pass — Aug. 22

When it comes to the debate on the sexed curriculum, it’s ironic that Joel Rubinoff trumpets inclusion and diversity all while condemning conservatives as “a group of priggish gasbags for whom sex is scary,” who should just choose to “opt out” or home school if they don’t want to trust their children’s sexual education entirely to educated strangers, namely psychologists and social workers. How is this showing respect and inclusion exactly?

Sex education is not the same as learning math or English. A mistake on a math fraction can affect a child for a moment, a sexual mistake can affect his entire life. Sexuality has bearings on the health of the whole person: mentally, physically, spiritually, and relationally. Parents should be encouraged to get involved in defining their children’s sexual education because of this critical impact. What is the role of a parent, if not to have a say in these matters? I say open wide our schools for public discussion and debate, and seek the input of our school councils, which represent the voices of parents and communities.

Public education should continue to support a pluralistic and inclusive society where all views are respected and everyone has a place to grow.

Jennifer Smith

Cambridge