Waterloo Region Record

Triumph Mayflower

- BILL VANCE

The British Triumph automobile gained its North American reputation principall­y through sports cars, starting with the popular TR series which extended from the 1953 TR2 all the way up to the V-8 powered TR8 in the early 1980s. There were also Spitfires and GTs, and even a few Stags. Although best known for sports cars, Triumph also imported family cars. Among the non-sporty Triumphs the most distinctiv­e was the little Mayflower two-door, four-passenger sedan that arrived in 1950. It is not remembered so much for its mechanical­s or performanc­e, both of which were rather ordinary, but for its unusual styling. The Mayflower applied the classic British sharply creased “razor edge” design to a really small sedan (and a few convertibl­es). Razor edge styling made its world debut in about 1935 on a 3.5 litre English Bentley produced by coachbuild­er Freestone & Webb. Other Engllish coachbuild­ers such as Mulliner and Hooper soon followed, and before and after the Second World War such marques as RollsRoyce, Daimler and Bentley had razor edge themes. In North America it would make some brief appearance­s on the rear styling of the early 1980s Chrysler Imperial and second generation Cadillac Seville. Triumph’s first postwar 1800 sedan introduced in 1946 also had razor edge lines but it was the Mayflower, designed and named for the North American market, that brought razor edge styling to the economy class. The Mayflower idea had emerged as early as 1944 about the time the Standard Motor Co. was buying the Triumph Motor Co. It was finally introduced in October, 1949. This long gestation period was because Standard was preoccupie­d with building tractors for Harry Ferguson, and it had also decided to concentrat­e on the new post-war Vanguard sedan. Production of the Mayflower finally got under way in the summer of 1950. With its sharply folded corners, traditiona­l Triumph vertical bar grille and squared-off trunk the Mayflower was not an unpleasant design. It looked like a condensed version of the mid-sized Triumph 1800 sedan. But like other shrunken models it couldn’t entirely escape looking a little like a caricature of the real thing such as those big Bentleys and Rolls-Royces. The Mayflower’s body was styled by Mulliner and built by Fisher and Ludlow, both of Birmingham. Although the Mayflower had unit constructi­on, which was an advanced feature for that time, and Triumph’s first, the rest of the Mayflower was pretty straightfo­rward. Power came from a 38 horsepower, side-valve, inline four cylinder engine of 1,247 cc (76 cu in.). It was a prewar design carried over from the Standard Ten, although It was now fitted with an aluminum cylinder head. The three speed fully synchroniz­ed, column shift transmissi­on was donated by the Vanguard. The Mayflower did, however, get its own independen­t coil spring front suspension, which would later find much more notoriety in the TR2 sports car. The Mayflower was small with a 2,134 mm (84 in.) wheelbase and only 3,912 mm (154 in.) length. Height and width were the same at 1,575 mm (62 in.) and it weighed about 907 kg (2,000 lb). In spite of having only a three speed transmissi­on when most small cars had four, the Mayflower, according to Mechanix Illustrate­d car tester Tom McCahill, turned in reasonable performanc­e for an economy car. In his December, 1952 road test, McCahill with his outrageous similes said the Mayflower had “... more acute angles than you can find in the uplift (bra) ads...” He also called its performanc­e “no bolt of lightning,” reporting a zero to 97 km/h (60 mph) time of 26.3 seconds and a top speed of 105 to 113 km/h (65 to 70 mph). This was acceptable performanc­e for an economy car of that time. The Mayflower’s competitor­s according to Road & Track had even slower pickup. The Hillman Minx took an interminab­le 40 seconds to 97 (60) and the Austin A40, 29.4 seconds. With top speeds of 117 (73) both were a little faster than the Mayflower. McCahill was quite impressed with the “exceptiona­lly fine handling” and the “light and sure” steering. While cornering was not in the MG class, it “held on like a tar stain on a white shirt.” Despite its unusual styling, or perhaps because of it, the Mayflower sold modestly. It was produced only from 1950 to 1953 during which time some 35,000 were built. Standard Motor Co. abandoned the Mayflower’s razor edge theme and went back to styling that was more rounded but far less distinctiv­e. The Triumph Mayflower had been a brief brave attempt to apply the Classic styling normally associated with large, exclusive cars to a small economy sedan. Although almost certainly not a money-maker for Standard, it has a far better chance of being remembered than the nondescrip­t little Standard econoboxes that followed it.

 ??  ?? Designed and named for the North American market, the Triumph Mayflower brought razor edge styling to the economy class.
Designed and named for the North American market, the Triumph Mayflower brought razor edge styling to the economy class.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada