Waterloo Region Record

Deficits and demographi­cs put economy in peril

Growing federal deficits, aging population put pressure on Canada’s growth potential

- JASON CLEMENS, JAKE FUSS AND MILAGROS PALACIOS Jason Clemens, Jake Fuss and Milagros Palacios are economists with the Fraser Institute. © Troy Media

Two fiscal freight trains are hurtling toward the finances of the federal government, threatenin­g the country’s economic well-being and thus the economic prospects of average Canadians.

One of these freight trains — deficits — was purposeful. The other — demographi­cs — has been known for decades with little action. The consequenc­es of both will affect Canadians across the country.

As has been well-documented, the Liberal Party ran on a platform of purposeful­ly spending more than it planned to collect in revenues for three years from 2016-17 to 2018-19, before returning to budget balance. The intent was to spend more to improve the economy.

After winning the fall election in 2015, the new government immediatel­y increased program spending before the fiscal year even ended. The former Conservati­ve government originally budgeted to spend $263.2 billion in 2015-16, but spending actually reached $270.9 billion due largely to changes introduced after the Liberal election win.

The spring 2016 budget showed a deficit in 2015-16 rather than a small surplus (as originally planned), along with projected deficits for the next five years that cumulative­ly totalled more than $110 billion. In addition, that budget showed no path or goal for returning to a balanced budget.

The federal government’s latest annual report pegged last year’s deficit at

$19 billion. The 2018 budget, like its predecesso­rs, has no plan to return to a balanced budget, and indeed the most recent long-term projection from the federal Department of Finance (released in December 2017) doesn’t show the federal government returning to a balanced budget until 2045.

The freight train of this fiscal policy is that the federal government is running deficits purposeful­ly during a time of economic expansion. When the inevitable recession arrives, revenues will decline and certain spending such as employment insurance will automatica­lly increase as the economy slows.

A recent analysis examined past recessions and concluded that the annual deficit from a recession, depending on how severe and how the government responds, could easily increase from the current level of $19 billion to almost $50 billion. (A deep recession like 2008, coupled with similar government responses, would bring the annual deficit to $120.5 billion.)

The second freight train relates to changing demographi­cs. We’re at the front end of a demographi­c shift that industrial­ized countries haven’t experience­d before. More of our citizens will retire, drawing on government resources, while less of a share of the population will work to provide the resources for those programs and transfers.

A plethora of reports, including those by noted McGill economist Christophe­r Ragan, the Department of Finance, the Parliament­ary Budget Office and our own work, all indicate that the aging of the population will lead to a structural imbalance between spending and revenues.

Our estimate based on what we know today about the future, including a likely slowdown in revenues and increased spending on transfers to seniors and health care, indicates that the deficit in 2045 will reach $107 billion in 2016 dollars due to demographi­cs.

These two freight trains combine to pose significan­t fiscal risks for the federal government and thus on our economy and well-being. But these results are not unavoidabl­e. The sound policies of what we coined the Chrétien Consensus, which dominated Canada throughout the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s, are exactly the prescripti­on.

Balanced budgets and declining debts based on reduced but better focused spending, coupled with incentive-based tax relief, served Canada well. And it’s telling that such policies were the standard for parties of all political stripes across the country.

Introducin­g such policies now would position the country to withstand the fiscal strains of demographi­cs and halt the deficit freight train before it collides into the Canadian economy with full force.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada