Waterloo Region Record

Determinin­g cause of death not always an exact science

Sometimes COVID-19 causes death and sometimes it is a contributi­ng factor, but not the direct cause

- DR. MICHAEL MULTAN Dr. Michael Multan is an anatomical pathology resident at the University of British Columbia. Twitter: @MultanMich­ael

Last month, Canadians heard of unusually high numbers of deaths in China, Italy and Spain. Today, we eagerly await daily statistics, including the number of COVID-19 deaths affecting our own population. Some worry that the real numbers are being withheld, while others believe the entire pandemic is all just one big hoax.

If only the calculatio­n was as simple as either.

Not many people understand how cause of death is determined, and probably even fewer understand how varied the process is from country to country, and even province to province. Understand­ing the basics of death certificat­ion and the death investigat­ion system is important when interpreti­ng death statistics.

In Canada, death investigat­ion is the responsibi­lity of each province and follows either the coroner’s system or medical examiner’s (ME) system. Most Canadians die of natural causes — cardiovasc­ular disease or cancer, for example. The cause is usually unsurprisi­ng, and death certificat­ion is done by the individual’s most responsibl­e physician shortly after death.

In cases of accident, homicide, suicide or when a cause of death cannot be easily determined, deaths are investigat­ed by either a coroner or ME. In provinces that have a coroner system, coroners might be GPs or individual­s with experience with death certificat­ion, but no formal medical training. In provinces with an ME system, a forensic pathologis­t completes the death certificat­e, and makes the decision whether to proceed to autopsy or not. Both systems have documented resource shortages.

Like most things in medicine, it is both a science and an art. Different systems may yield different results.

In either case, this informatio­n is important to families and sometimes important to the justice system. In a pandemic, this informatio­n becomes critical to public health tracking and health care planning. While COVID-19 deaths fall in the “natural” category, COVID-19 death statistics have become uniquely important and interestin­g.

We have without a doubt seen a significan­t increase in the number of Canadian care home deaths, associated with COVID-19 outbreaks. Our public health officers have ramped up testing and have been doing a wonderful job with reporting statistics and advice. It’s allowed for the identifica­tion of a critical trend in care homes.

But what is a “COVID-19 death” and did the patient die from COVID-19 or with COVID-19?

A recent COVID-19 autopsy study by pulmonary pathologis­t Dr. Sanjay Mukhopadhy­ay out of Cleveland Clinic demonstrat­ed the point that determinat­ions of death based on clinical informatio­n and COVID-19 swab testing alone are not an exact science. Determinat­ion of cause of death, even with autopsy, can be difficult. Most COVID-19 deaths in Canada won’t undergo autopsy, and this is might not be a major issue when someone presents with a positive test, classic radiologic findings and clinical course of deteriorat­ing respirator­y illness.

The study analyzed the clinical and autopsy informatio­n of two individual­s who had positive COVID-19 swab tests in Oklahoma. The first was a 77-year-old man who had a number of complex medical issues. He had been experienci­ng weakness and chills for a number of days. EMS was called after he reported worsening shortness of breath. He died shortly after arrival to hospital.

His autopsy confirmed the presence of COVID-19 in his lungs and demonstrat­ed microscopi­c lung damage. While the man showed signs of other underlying diseases, they were not deemed significan­t enough to explain his death, and the cause of death was listed as COVID-19 with his other conditions listed under “other contributi­ng factors.”

The second case was a 42-year-old man with a known heart dystrophy. He was admitted to the hospital with “community acquired pneumonia” in critical condition and died while in hospital. While his COVID-19 swab was positive, his lungs did not test positive for COVID-19 and showed no microscopi­c evidence of the viral disease. He died with COVID-19, and not of COVID-19, and the autopsy was critical in making this distinctio­n.

The practice of autopsy is an expensive and invasive medical test. In Canada, we do not have the resources and capacity — think staffing and personal protective equipment — to perform a complete autopsy on every “possible” COVID-19 death. Like any medical test, it is an important tool when a diagnosis, or in this case, a cause of death, cannot be easily ascertaine­d.

Our system is doing its best to track vital statistics, and our experts are working around the clock to interpret trends in order to provide us with daily guidance. All statistics will have some bias or margin of error.

Canadians should continue to trust the interpreta­tions of trends done by our experts. We can only start making sense of numbers once we have a better sense of how they are collected and compiled.

Death statistics are no exception.

 ?? NATHAN DENETTE TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? A body is wheeled from the Eatonville Care Centre, where multiple deaths from COVID-19 have occurred, in Toronto. Canadians should trust statistics from the pandemic, but understand they are not always infallible, writes Dr. Michael Multan.
NATHAN DENETTE TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO A body is wheeled from the Eatonville Care Centre, where multiple deaths from COVID-19 have occurred, in Toronto. Canadians should trust statistics from the pandemic, but understand they are not always infallible, writes Dr. Michael Multan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada