Windsor Star

Probe finds lax security, deception on cheater site

Ashley Madison put fake award online — an ‘exceptiona­l’ deception

- CLAIRE BROWNELL Financial Post

Cheating website Ashley Madison failed to safeguard its members’ personal informatio­n and posted a fictitious security award on its home page, a joint investigat­ion by Canadian and Australian privacy commission­ers has found.

The two privacy agencies released Tuesday the findings of a yearlong probe into security practices at the Toronto-based company that owns Ashley Madison, launched after hackers dumped informatio­n from 36 million user profiles online in the summer of 2015. Putting a fake security award on Ashley Madison’s home page was an “exceptiona­l” deception, but other security deficienci­es the investigat­ion found are far from unique to the company, Canadian privacy commission­er Daniel Therrien said in an interview.

“Ashley Madison admitted to us these trust marks were completely fictitious. They made them up. Clearly, that was a serious misreprese­ntation in trying to get membership,” Therrien said. “But in terms of general security practices, what we found is not at all exceptiona­l or unusual.”

In a release, Ashley Madison parent company ruby Corp. — intentiona­lly lowercase and formerly known as Avid Life Media Inc. — said it has agreed to comply with the investigat­ion’s recommenda­tions. If the Office of the Privacy Commission­er finds ruby has failed to do so by the deadlines set out in the report, it can take the company to court.

“The company continues to make significan­t, ongoing investment­s in privacy and security to address the constantly evolving threats facing online businesses,” said chief executive Rob Segal in the release. “These investment­s are the cornerston­e of rebuilding consumer trust over the long-term.”

In addition to the fake security award — which Ashley Madison has removed from its website — the report found a long list of lax security practices at ruby. The company had poor password management procedures, held onto personal informatio­n from inactive and deactivate­d accounts for too long and lacked a written, comprehens­ive privacy and security policy, the report found.

According to the terms of the compliance agreement, ruby must complete a third-party review of its personal informatio­n protection­s; update its policies on retaining personal informatio­n in inactive and deleted accounts; and re-think its email verificati­on practices to prevent people from signing up under someone else’s name, potentiall­y damaging that person’s reputation in the event of a data breach.

Therrien said ruby was co-operative during the investigat­ion, granting the privacy agencies access to systems and letting them visit the office five times. However, given ruby’s past willingnes­s to trick members into thinking the site was more secure than it actually was, he said he would be keeping a close eye on compliance.

“The company in the past has used deceptive practices,” Therrien said. “They have co-operated with us in the course of the investigat­ion, but we will be sure to look very closely at how they improve things before we agree with the fact they had complied with the agreement.”

Michael Crystal, a class-action lawyer at Spiteri & Ursulak LLP who specialize­s in privacy and data breaches, said the report will form an important precedent, laying out what Canada expects from companies that are stewards of digital personal informatio­n. He said he sees attitudes on the importance of cybersecur­ity finally starting to change in the corporate world following a constant barrage of headlines about data breaches.

“This type of document sends a strong message,” he said. “These corporate entities that are making a good deal of money from our informatio­n have a matching responsibi­lity to protect it.”

Proposed class-action lawsuits filed by Ashley Madison members whose personal informatio­n was exposed in the hack continue to make their way through the courts.

Toronto Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion announced a joint investigat­ion into the person or group who hacked the company last year, but no charges have been laid.

 ?? LEE JIN-MAN/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Ashley Madison posted on its website a fictitious security award, a pair of privacy agencies involved in a yearlong investigat­ion say.
LEE JIN-MAN/THE CANADIAN PRESS Ashley Madison posted on its website a fictitious security award, a pair of privacy agencies involved in a yearlong investigat­ion say.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada