Windsor Star

Change dispatch protocol to save cash

-

Re: Ready for fire fight, by Chris Thompson, June 15.

Your article failed to address one area where a great deal of money can be saved by addressing tiered dispatch protocol.

The original criteria for tiered response for firefighte­rs in the Essex County were: unconsciou­s patient, chest pain, or heart attack or stroke symptoms, trouble breathing/shortness of breath, vital signs absent and uncontroll­ed bleeding.

Now, it seems firefighte­rs are responding unnecessar­ily to incidents much more minor in nature than previously mentioned. The problem rests with the protocol the dispatcher­s follow. It needs to be reviewed. The dispatch protocol regarding carbon monoxide or smoke alarms going off is in some municipali­ties a money pit.

To send four to six firefighte­rs is totally unnecessar­y.

If the caller is reporting symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning, the fire department should respond. Two firefighte­rs on call with pagers and a command car can easily handle the job and reduce cost.

There is another easy way to save dollars. When firefighte­rs have been told to “stand down” prior to a run because they’re not needed, they currently still send a large truck with a full crew to take the report.

If it’s absolutely necessary, send a command car, not an engine, to gather the informatio­n. Otherwise, pick up the phone and call the OPP or the emergency medical services dispatcher for the incident number for your report.

This letter is in no way a criticism of the job police officers, firefighte­rs and paramedics do to save lives daily. What I am pointing out is a need for change to the dispatch criteria to cut costs and even make first-responders more efficient.

Paul Robertson, Lakeshore

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada