Windsor Star

ORDEAL DRAGS ON

Questions linger on Fukushima

- MARI YAMAGUCHI The Associated Press

More than six years after a tsunami overwhelme­d the Fukushima nuclear power plant, Japan has yet to reach consensus on what to do with a million tons of radioactiv­e water, stored on site in approximat­ely 900 large and densely packed tanks that could spill should another major earthquake or tsunami strike.

The stalemate is rooted in a fundamenta­l conflict between science and human nature.

Experts advising the government have urged a gradual release to the nearby Pacific Ocean. Treatment has removed all the radioactiv­e elements except tritium, which they say is safe in small amounts. Conversely, if the tanks break, their contents could slosh out in an uncontroll­ed way.

Local fishermen are balking. The water, no matter how clean, has a dirty image for consumers, they say. Despite repeated tests showing most types of fish caught off Fukushima are safe to eat, diners remain hesitant. The fishermen fear any release would sound the death knell for their nascent and still fragile recovery.

“People would shun Fukushima fish again as soon as the water is released,” said Fumio Haga, a drag-net fisherman from Iwaki, a city about 50 kilometres down the coast from the nuclear plant.

And so the tanks remain.

Fall is high season for saury and flounder, among Fukushima’s signature fish. It was once a busy time of year when coastal fishermen were out every morning.

Then came March 11, 2011. A magnitude-9 offshore earthquake triggered a tsunami that killed more than 18,000 people along Japan’s northeast coast. The quake and massive flooding knocked out power for the cooling systems at the Fukushima nuclear plant. Three of the six reactors had partial meltdowns. Radiation spewed into the air, and highly contaminat­ed water ran into the Pacific.

Today, only about half of the region’s 1,000 fishermen go out, and just twice a week because of reduced demand. They participat­e in a fish-testing program.

Lab technician­s mince fish samples at Onahama port in Iwaki, pack them in a cup for inspection and record such details as who caught the fish and where. Packaged fish sold at supermarke­ts carry official “safe” stickers.

Only three kinds of fish passed the test when the experiment began in mid-2012, 15 months after the tsunami. Over time, that number has increased to about 100.

The fish meet what is believed to be the world’s most stringent requiremen­t: less than half the radioactiv­e cesium level allowed under Japan’s national standard and one-twelfth of the U.S. or EU limit, said Yoshiharu Nemoto, a senior researcher at the Onahama testing station.

That message isn’t reaching consumers. A survey by Japan’s Consumer Agency in October found that nearly half of Japanese weren’t aware of the tests, and that consumers are more likely to focus on alarming informatio­n about possible health impacts in extreme cases, rather than facts about radiation and safety standards.

Fewer Japanese consumers shun fish and other foods from Fukushima than before, but one in five still do, according to the survey.

Naoya Sekiya, a University of Tokyo expert on disaster informatio­n and social psychology, said that the water from the nuclear plant shouldn’t be released until people are well-informed about the basic facts and psychologi­cally ready.

“A release only based on scientific safety, without addressing the public’s concerns, cannot be tolerated in a democratic society,” he said. “A release when people are unprepared would only make things worse.”

The amount of radioactiv­e water at Fukushima is still growing, by 150 tons a day.

The reactors are damaged beyond repair, but cooling water must be constantly pumped in to keep them from overheatin­g. That water picks up radioactiv­ity before leaking out of the damaged containmen­t chambers and collecting in the basements.

There, the volume of contaminat­ed water grows, because it mixes with groundwate­r that has seeped in through cracks in the reactor buildings. After treatment, 210 tons is reused as cooling water, and the remaining 150 tons is sent to tank storage. During heavy rains, the groundwate­r inflow increases significan­tly, adding to the volume.

The water is a costly headache for Tokyo Electric Power Co., the utility that owns the plant. Another government panel recommende­d last year that the utility, known as TEPCO, dilute the water up to about 50 times and release about 400 tons daily to the sea — a process that would take almost a decade to complete. Experts note that the release of radioactiv­e tritium water is allowed at other nuclear plants.

A new chairman at TEPCO, Takashi Kawamura, caused an uproar in the fishing community in April when he expressed support for moving ahead with the release of the water.

The company quickly backpedall­ed, and now says it has no plans for an immediate release and can keep storing water through 2020. Some experts have proposed moving the tanks to an intermedia­te storage area, or delaying the release until at least 2023, when half the tritium that was present at the time of the disaster will have disappeare­d naturally.

 ??  ??
 ?? DAISUKE SUZUKI/KYODO NEWS VIA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Hundreds of tanks full of radioactiv­e water surround the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in Okuma, Japan.
DAISUKE SUZUKI/KYODO NEWS VIA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Hundreds of tanks full of radioactiv­e water surround the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in Okuma, Japan.
 ?? MARI YAMAGUCHI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A fish retailer at the Onahama fish market in Iwaki City, Fukushima, cuts up tuna from Miyazaki, southern Japan, amid slumping demand for Fukushima fish.
MARI YAMAGUCHI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A fish retailer at the Onahama fish market in Iwaki City, Fukushima, cuts up tuna from Miyazaki, southern Japan, amid slumping demand for Fukushima fish.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada