Windsor Star

Province narrows sites for nuclear fuel rods

Three communitie­s in northern Ontario still in running for undergroun­d facility

- The Canadian Press

Waste management authoritie­s have ruled out one part of northern Ontario as a suitable site for a bunker to store used, but highly radioactiv­e, nuclear-reactor fuel rods.

In a statement on Wednesday, the Nuclear Waste Management Organizati­on said the Elliot Lake and Blind River area between the cities of Sudbury and Sault Ste. Marie are out of the running.

“Technical studies and engagement with people in the area identified a number of factors that would pose challenges in siting a repository,” the organizati­on said. “These include complexiti­es associated with the geology, limited access and rugged terrain, and low potential to develop the breadth of partnershi­ps needed to implement the project.”

Three other communitie­s in northern Ontario remain as potential sites: Ignace about 250 kilometres northwest of Thunder Bay, Manitouwad­ge, about 395 kilometres east of Thunder Bay, and Hornepayne, about 480 kilometres east of Thunder Bay.

The other two remaining potential sites — South Bruce and Huron-Kinloss — are close to the Bruce nuclear reactor on the Lake Huron shoreline near Kincardine, site of a long and ongoing battle by Ontario Power Generation to win approval for a deep geologic repository for low and intermedia­te level radioactiv­e waste.

Dan Marchisell­a, mayor of Elliot Lake, expressed disappoint­ment at the exclusion of his community after five years, calling it a “huge potential loss” for the entire district.

The former mining town, once known as the uranium capital of the world, felt that putting itself forward was the responsibl­e thing to do given the vexing question of how best to safely store waste that remains toxic for thousands of years, he said. “The footprint of that geology they were looking for is not large enough,” Marchisell­a said in an interview. “It’s very difficult to access that area.”

The hunt for a place to permanentl­y store used nuclear fuel rods — about 2.7 million bundles currently exist — began in earnest in 2010, with 22 communitie­s expressing interest. The dangerous material is currently stored in pools of water or in vaults on site at reactors in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Manitoba. The envisaged repository would be about 500 metres undergroun­d.

“The decision to narrow our focus is part of an ongoing, rigorous process to identify a single, safe site in an area with an informed and willing host and strong potential for the partnershi­ps that will be required to implement the project,” said Mahrez Ben Belfadhel, a vice-president with the wastemanag­ement organizati­on.

While the organizati­on expects to be able to choose its preferred site by about 2023, winning any approval for an undergroun­d bunker is likely to go years beyond that date if Ontario Power Generation’s odyssey is anything to go by.

The utility took years to win tentative approval in 2015 to build a bunker at the Bruce site near Lake Huron for material that is far less toxic than nuclear fuel rods but has made little progress since.

Federal Environmen­t Minister Catherine McKenna is now waiting for Indigenous communitie­s in the area to weigh in — a process likely to take at least another year. In addition, scores of communitie­s around the Great Lakes have decried any suggestion the site so close to the lake is suitable — paving the way for what could be years of court battles.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada