Tax pros become suddenly very popular, if a little confused
WASHINGTON Americans shouldn’t feel bad if they don’t understand how the new tax bill will affect you. Chances are, their accountants doesn’t yet either.
From New York to Florida, accountants and tax lawyers are scanning the 1,000-page measure, fielding a swirl of questions from clients and swapping tips via email in their efforts to fully grasp the bill’s far-reaching changes.
When the House and Senate released the final tax bill late last week, it gave many experts their first look at what will become a vast rewrite of tax law. Congress gave approval to the measure Wednesday, and U.S. President Donald Trump is to sign it early next month.
“The whole weekend I was overwhelmed with client requests on how this impacted them, and it hasn’t stopped, and probably won’t for several weeks,” said Gary DuBoff, an accountant at MBAF, a New York-based firm. The uncertainties range widely. Should some taxpayers try to reclassify their pay as business income, which is taxed at lower rates for top earners? Should small companies restructure as corporations to capitalize on a now-much lower corporate tax rate? Can people in high-tax states rush to prepay their 2018 state and local income taxes this year to fully capitalize on the deduction for such payments, before it’s capped next year?
The answers are: Maybe, maybe and no, though taxpayers may be able to prepay their 2018 local property taxes this year.
“Every one of your clients is calling you, and they all want to know what the effect is,” says Joseph Perry, an accountant at Marcum, based in Melville, N.Y. “It’s like, ‘Wait, slow down — we have to figure this out.”’
Most accountants scoff at the notion, pushed by the bill’s proponents, that it has simplified the tax code. For higher-income earners in particular, as well as many small businesses, tax law remains at least as complex as ever. And the bill has injected a new layer of uncertainty because so many changes are temporary and could be reversed in a few years.
The need for clarity is welcome news for the professionals who need to sort it all out.
“It’s going to be good for business,” said George Smith, a thirdgeneration accountant based in Southfield, Mich. “I’m a tax geek; I’m excited about the nuances.”
After the last major tax overhaul took effect in 1986, it became clear that many small businesses would benefit by reorganizing as partnerships, says Joseph DeGennaro, tax director for Doeren Mayhew in Detroit. Doing so allowed their business profits to be passed on as personal income, which was taxed at individual tax rates. At that time, the top individual rates were lower than the corporate rate.
Now, the situation is reversed: The new legislation sharply cuts the corporate tax rate from 35 per cent to 21 per cent — much lower than most individual rates. DeGennaro and other accountants say the question being posed most often by small business owners is whether those firms should now restructure as corporations. This time, the answer is not so simple.
If corporations pay out their profits to owners through dividends, those payments are taxed at 23.8 per cent. That rate, once combined with the corporate tax rate, is much higher than individual rates.
And in some cases, if a business restructures, it can’t switch back for five years. What if a new Congress raises the corporate tax rate, in say, three years? At that point, DeGennaro pointed out, a business owner would be stuck paying the higher corporate rate.
“I’m telling clients that nothing is permanent,” DuBoff said. “If you restructure for the new law, you better have an exit strategy.”
Many critics of the GOP bill argue that it will encourage highincome earners to turn themselves into businesses and reclassify their salaries as business income, which will be taxed at a lower rate. But the bill seeks to bar this through complex rules and by blocking many professionals, such as lawyers, accountants and doctors, from taking that step.
Some of these questions must be answered before year’s end — an additional source of frustration for experts. “It’s too much, too quick and too little time,” Smith said.