Windsor Star

North Buxton congregati­on launches suit

Group seeking $2 million from former parent church over legal title to property

- ELLWOOD SHREVE With files by Jennifer Bieman

A community church with historic ties to the Undergroun­d Railroad has gone on the offensive, filing a $2-million lawsuit against the Toronto-based British Methodist Episcopal Church in a fight over control of the 150-year-old property. The North Buxton Community Church filed a statement of claim in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice rejecting the ownership claims of its former parent church, the British Methodist Episcopal Church.

The lawsuit — filed Tuesday in Chatham — seeks to have the court remove the British Methodist Episcopal Church (BMEC) as administra­tor of the trust governing the church lands, turning the property over to the trustees of the Bethel congregati­on of the BMEC — the current North Buxton Community Church — that split from the BMEC roughly 15 years ago. Steve Pickard, the lawyer for the North Buxton congregati­on, said part of the claim focuses on a 1913 act of the Ontario legislatur­e to incorporat­e the British Methodist Episcopal Church.

In the statutes that created the BMEC, it says “these lands will be transferre­d to BMEC for the use of the congregati­on,” Pickard said. “So, that creates a trust,” he added. “BMEC is only holding it in trust for the congregati­ons, meaning the real, true owners are the congregati­ons.”

The lawsuit alleges the BMEC improperly, and without notice, took steps to remove the Bethel congregati­on from the title of the church and its cemetery. “The Bethel congregati­on has only learned that BMEC ‘transferre­d’ the property by way of an Applicatio­n to Land Titles,” the claim states. “The applicatio­n was for a name change stating falsely that the trustees of Bethel congregati­on of the British Methodist Episcopal Church had changed its name to the British Methodist Episcopal Church.”

The claim notes the BMEC sought the transfer of the church lands in an original applicatio­n the Bethel congregati­on and North Buxton Community Church intended to oppose.

“Had BMEC taken a proper legal route to change title, it would have had to serve the Bethel congregati­on and the North Buxton Community Church, and they would have had the opportunit­y to oppose,” the claim states. “BMEC’s name change tactic was done fraudulent­ly to avoid the issue of title and to remove the Bethel congregati­on’s and the North Buxton Community Church’s ability to oppose.” None of the allegation­s have been proven in court.

The lawyer for the British Methodist Episcopal Church could not be reached for comment. This continuing legal battle between the North Buxton Community Church and the BMEC hinges on that 1913 incorporat­ion act, lawyers for both sides first said last month after the Chatham-area congregati­on decided to take the ownership dispute to court. The provincial organizati­on’s ownership claim over the Buxton church also relies, at least in part, on the 1913 Act to Incorporat­e the British Methodist Episcopal Church. The 19th-century chapel southwest of Chatham was named in that 105-year-old document. Section four of the act said any property “held by or in trust for or to the use of any congregati­on” is vested by the BMEC, regardless­of“whateverna­meitmaybe held.” The 19 specified properties across the province — listed in a separate section — included the Buxton church.

After the act received royal assent on May 6, 1913, the organizati­on never followed up and changed the titles of those 19 properties into its name, BMEC lawyer Michael Czuma said in a July interview.

That changed on Nov. 17, 2017, when the land title for the Buxton church was transferre­d to the BMEC from the trustees of Bethel Congregati­on of the British Methodist Episcopal Church. The provincial organizati­on submitted an applicatio­n to change the title, citing the statute as evidence to support the claim.

The BMEC then served the North Buxton congregati­on with legal notice late last year to vacate the historic Chatham-area chapel or rejoin the ranks of the Ontariowid­e religious group.

The new statement of claim also details the history of the church, which was built by slaves who found freedom in the Buxton Settlement after escaping bondage in the U.S. by following the Undergroun­d Railway.

Many of the residents of Buxton, like many of the members of the Bethel congregati­on, are direct descendant­s of those escaped slaves, the claim states.

It adds many of their ancestors from that time, and throughout the next 150 years, have been buried in the adjoining cemetery located on church lands.

“The remains of their ancestors are of particular concern to many of the Bethel congregati­on,” the claim states.

“To many of the community, the care of the cemetery is of much more concern than the actual church building itself.”

The claim also notes it is still an active cemetery, with more than 100 graves purchased and reserved for future burials for members of the community and descendant­s of the original inhabitant­s of the settlement.

“The number will continue to increase for the foreseeabl­e future as many more people will wish for this to be their final resting place.”

 ?? ELLWOOD SHREVE ?? Bryan Prince, a descendant of the original settlers of North Buxton, stands in front of the North Buxton Community Church that is at the centre of a legal battle with the Toronto-based British Methodist Episcopal Church of Canada.
ELLWOOD SHREVE Bryan Prince, a descendant of the original settlers of North Buxton, stands in front of the North Buxton Community Church that is at the centre of a legal battle with the Toronto-based British Methodist Episcopal Church of Canada.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada