Beijing Review

Fear Is Not the Key

China-u.s. ties need more positive energy to overcome rising tensions

- By Sun Chenghao

TThe author is an assistant researcher at the Institute of American Studies, China Institutes of Contempora­ry Internatio­nal Relations here has been more anti-china rhetoric from the Trump administra­tion of late with President Donald Trump attacking Chinese trade and economic practices in his speech to the UN General Assembly on September 25 and Vice President Michael Pence delivering an all-out assault in his speech at Hudson Institute on October 4. All of this made U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s China visit on October 8 critical.

The bilateral relationsh­ip has been facing turbulence since the White House released the National Security Strategy (NSS) in December 2017 and the Department of Defense came up with the National Defense Strategy this January, labeling China a “revisionis­t power” and “strategic competitor,” thus setting the tone for the Trump administra­tion’s China policy.

Negative narrative

Washington seems to be using a negative narrative to describe the bilateral relationsh­ip, regarding the United States’ China strategy in the past 40 years, namely changing China by engagement, as having failed, based on the three major mispercept­ions of China. The United States believes China is dismissing U.S. power, discrediti­ng U.S. democracy and dismantlin­g the U.s.-led internatio­nal order.

Although the NSS report states that competitio­n will not necessaril­y lead to confrontat­ion, and Pence too stressed it in his speech, the American anxiety and eagerness to compete with China are bound to create more misunderst­anding and mistrust between the two countries.

The United States has several mispercept­ions about competitio­n. Firstly, it thinks the competitio­n with China will be limited to the economic field. Secondly, it is not targeting China alone, but is competing with other countries as well, including its allies. Finally, by competing with China, Trump is correcting his predecesso­r’s wrong policies.

However, if we look at U. S. trade policies toward China, they have already crossed the stage of addressing trade deficits or economic problems. Washington has groundless accusation­s about China’s lack of intellectu­al property protection and market openness and technology transfer needs, demanding major concession­s in those areas as a preconditi­on for holding trade talks with China.

In other words, the trade conflict triggered by the United States is not for turning trade numbers, but to change China’s pace of reform and opening up, or alter China’s economic developmen­t mode. It means the United States is using its economic strength to interfere in China’s domestic policies.

Moreover, the United States is not really competing with its allies but is coercing them to economical­ly isolate China if that becomes necessary in the future. The new United Sates-mexico-canada Agreement, the renegotiat­ion that could replace the North American Free Trade Agreement, is a good example. It states that if one partner enters into a free trade agreement with a “non-market economy,” the others are entitled to withdraw from the deal with six months’ notice. The language is widely seen as referring to China since the United States has long refused to recognize China as a market economy.

It is also expected that the United States will continue to seek allies to form a common front against China by adding this clause in the possible free trade agreements with Japan and the European Union. This kind of so-called competitio­n will lead to economic confrontat­ion between the United States and China.

The trade conflict has already spilled over to other areas in China-u.s. relations. On the security front, the United States has been constantly underminin­g China’s interests and interferin­g in China’s domestic politics. The Taiwan Travel Act, signed by Trump in March, promotes “high-level diplomatic exchanges” between the United States and China’s Taiwan Province; and on September 24, the United States announced new arms sales to Taiwan valued at $330 million.

Soon after the arms sale announceme­nt, a U. S. guided- missile destroyer patrolled the South China Sea, once again

The Trump administra­tion is trying to “domestical­ize” the China-u.s. relationsh­ip by demonizing China’s role in U.S. domestic politics

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China