Construction of Cross Border E-Commerce Dispute Enforcement Mechanism Based on Private Execution and Smart Contract

[19]新浪网.跨境电商纠纷明显增多：网易考拉小红书等被法院点名[EB/OL]（. 2019-03-19）[2019-08-14].https：//fi⁃ nance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/cyxw/2019- 03- 19/doc- ihsxn cvh3837986.shtml. [20]龙飞.人工智能在纠纷解决领域的应用与发展[J].法律科

学，2019（1）：53.

[21]凤凰网.阿里首创大众评审机制：6 1

年解决 亿次纠纷，成互联网全行业通用规则[EB/OL]（. 2018-12-05）[20190706].http：//finance.ifeng.com/a/20181205/16605211_0. shtml. [22]周翔.描述与解释：淘宝纠纷解决机制——ODR

的中国经验观察[J].

上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）， 2018（6）：15. [23]龙飞.中国在线纠纷解决机制的发展现状和未来前景[J].

法律适用，2016（10）：4.

[24]SZABO N.Smart contracts，avaliable：november5，2018[EB/ OL]（. 2018-05-07）[2019-07-10].http：//www.fon.hum.uva. nl/rob/Courses/Information InSeech/CDROM/Literature/LO Twinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html. [25]SWANSONT T.Great chain of numbers：a guide to smart contracts[M].New York：Smart Prpperty and Trustless As⁃ set Management，2014：11-16. [26]王延川.智能合约的构造与风险防治[J].法学杂志，2019

（2）：44. [27]蔡一博.智能合约与私法体系契合问题研究[J].东方法

学，2019（2）：75. [28]余建华，吴巍，张名扬.杭州互联网法院区块链智能合约司法应用上线[EB/OL]（. 2019-10-25）[2020-06-15].https： //www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2019/10/id/4591024.sht ml. [29]浦东平，樊重俊，梁贺君.基于区块链视角的电商平台体

系构建及应用[J].中国流通经济，2018（3）：48. [30]RUTTENBERG W.Distributed ledger technologies in secu⁃ rities post- trading[R].European central occasional paper， 2016（172）：18. [31]龙飞.大数据时代纠纷解决模式之变革[N].人民法院报， 2016-11-02（08）.

责任编辑：林英泽

（Faculty of Arts，Xi'an University of Architectural Science and Technology，Xi’an 710055，Shaanxi，China）

Abstract：Cross border e-commerce dispute resolution has become one of the problems that hinder the rapid development of cross- border e- commerce in the future. In recent years，China has begun to focus on the development of“Silk Road ecommerce”，and the volume of cross- border online transactions has increased significantly. After the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia，due to the obstruction of offline transactions，the volume of online transactions has increased rapidly， and the number of commercial disputes has also increased sharply. In this context，influenced by Internet technology，the traditional way of judicial enforcement to protect online dispute enforcement has obvious effectiveness limitations，and network private enforcement has increasingly highlighted the normative value and comparative advantage. Based on the practical investigation of the network private power execution mode，although it still faces the problems of poor implementation effect and technology lag，it can improve its efficiency by introducing the smart contract technology，so as to open up a realistic path to resolve the dilemma of Online Dispute execution. In view of this，the future of the enforcement mechanism of cross-border ecommerce online disputes should follow the demands of modern rule of law，take smart contracts as the carrier，establish an integrated linkage mechanism from trial to execution and decentralization，and strive to improve the implementation supervision system，evidence collection and security storage system，and finally form an implementation mechanism with network autonomy as the main and judicial relief as the supplement.

Key words：cross-border e-commerce；dispute enforcement mechanism；network private execution；intelligent contract