China Daily (Hong Kong)

INVESTMENT-DRIVEN

- By ZHENG YANGPENG zhengyangp­eng@ chinadaily.com.cn

Capital input into infrastruc­ture still engine for economy

For the central government, it is time for cautious mini-stimulus. But in reality, some local government­s may be making mini-stimulus into, once again, a campaign for building huge public projects on huge investment and huge borrowing. Experts said they worry that some of these projects aren’t commercial­ly viable. They urged an overhaul of China’s local financing system.

Just this past Sunday, Chongqing municipali­ty approved the constructi­on of a 51-kilometer urban rail line. The line is scheduled for completion by 2018, with total investment of 31.4 billion yuan ($5.13 billion).

Another local rail line costing 4.1 billion yuan also passed preliminar­y evaluation­s.

A few days earlier, Northwest China’s Gansu province approved a feasibilit­y study for the first subway line in the capital city, Lanzhou. The project would cost 18.9 billion yuan.

Citing Zhu Maokun, former chief engineer of the Ministry of Railways, which is now named China Railway Corp, the 21st Century Business Herald reported that 36 cities have approved the constructi­on of urban rail projects.

By 2020, there will be nearly 6,000 km of urban rail systems in China, and total investment could hit 4 trillion yuan.

While domestic media were quick to characteri­ze the urban rail constructi­on boom as a localized version of a “stimulus program”, experts said projects should be weighed on a caseby-case basis.

“These cities, such as Chongqing, Lanzhou and Kunming are large by Western standards. The concentrat­ion of population makes it viable to build an urban rail transit,” said Shi Hongxiu, a public finance professor with the Chinese Academy of Governance.

He said as China’s urbanizati­on proceeds, urban rail projects, as well as flood control and sewage systems, will be in great demand. Grouping all of these under the umbrella of “stimulus” spending might be misleading, he said.

Lu Ming, an economics professor with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, said that as exports and consumptio­n are hard to expand in the short term, scaling up infrastruc­ture investment was indeed the most effective way to spur growth.

Lu and other experts said the key cause for concern was whether these cities’ alreadyhig­h liabilitie­s would be increased whether these new projects could recover their costs.

To address the financing problem, Shi said it is essential to develop China’s capital markets and allow city government­s to issue project-backed bonds directly. At present, local government­s are banned from issuing bonds directly.

As a way around this restrictio­n, many local government­s in recent years turned to financing vehicles.

But the central government has moved to rein in these operations since 2010, pushing some local government­s to turn to high-cost shadow-banking debt.

That has exacerbate­d doubts about their repayment abilities. Lu noted that urban rail systems rarely achieve an operating profit, and local government­s should consider allowing operators to participat­e in their developmen­t projects.

Local government­s also plan to invest in inter-city railways and highways, airports and urban renewal projects.

Since mid- year, the State Council, China’s cabinet, has ceded more administra­tive approval power to provincial government­s. This was seen as a major move to facilitate the project launch process.

Chongqing’s urban rail system is the first infrastruc­ture project to be approved by the municipal government.

Shi said he is worried about giving more approval power to local government­s, not because the central government is wiser, but because giving provinces this power could make it easier for local administra­tors to interfere with the market.

Local government­s “tend to be insensitiv­e to the risks and price signals of the market”.

Rather than delegating approval power to local government­s, it would be better to just remove such power, Shi said.

“We cannot say all of the projects are unnecessar­y. But we also have to ask, how many of these projects have undergone rational examinatio­n?” Lu said. “Is there a more economical way to carry out these projects? For example, light rail and tram systems can also reduce congestion, but they are much cheaper than subways.”

Apart from direct investment, some local government­s have reportedly secured funding support that is essentiall­y coming from the central government.

For example, Shanghai will receive a 250 billion yuan loan from Agricultur­al Bank of China Ltd to help fund the city’s planned Disneyland park and free-trade zone, according to a South China Morning post report.

Lu said although he could not comment on the specific project, the measure could be necessary. “Shanghai, with its freetrade zone plan, is projected to be a growth hub for the next decade. Financial resources should go to where the growth is,” he said.

 ?? SHEN DA / FOR CHINA DAILY ?? Workers fasten cables on the Jiaxing-Shaoxing bridge in Zhejiang province. Some local government­s still see big-ticket infrastruc­ture projects such as rail lines and urban renewal programs as a way to shore up economic growth.
SHEN DA / FOR CHINA DAILY Workers fasten cables on the Jiaxing-Shaoxing bridge in Zhejiang province. Some local government­s still see big-ticket infrastruc­ture projects such as rail lines and urban renewal programs as a way to shore up economic growth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China