China Daily (Hong Kong)

Facts for Biden’s reference

- EDITORIALS

US VICE-PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN WAS CORRECT when he said in Tokyo on Tuesday, there is “the need for crisis management mechanisms” for the East China Sea Air Defense Identifica­tion Zone, because, as he pointed out, “the prospect for miscalcula­tion and mistake is too high”.

So he has plenty of things to straighten out while he is in Beijing, on the second leg of his three-country Asia trip.

First of all, despite trying to present the image of being an impartial mediator, Washington has obviously taken Japan’s side. Turning a blind eye to Tokyo’s provocatio­ns, the root cause of the tensions, the United States is wrongly pointing an accusing finger at China for “unilateral­ly” changing the “status quo” in the East China Sea.

Biden, with his diplomatic record, is believed to be Washington’s best bet as a crisis-defuser, but he should not expect any substantia­l headway if he comes simply to repeat his government’s previous erroneous and one-sided remarks.

He should listen carefully to the Chinese side of the story, and our leaders should make sure their American guest leaves Beijing better informed about the causality of the East China Sea dispute.

Again, our timely visitor needs to be told: It is Japan that has unilateral­ly changed the status quo. From its regular patrols of the Diaoyu Islands to the establishm­ent of its new ADIZ, China is just responding to Japanese provocatio­ns.

If the US is truly committed to lowering tensions in the region, it must first stop acquiescin­g to Tokyo’s dangerous brinkmansh­ip. It must stop emboldenin­g belligeren­t Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to constantly push the envelope of Japan’s encroachme­nts and provocatio­ns.

Most important of all, Biden needs to be reminded that Japan holds the key to peacefully solving the East China Sea dispute, because it is the Abe administra­tion’s recalcitra­nt denial of the existence of a dispute that has prevented Beijing and Tokyo from conducting meaningful communicat­ion and crisis control. From the very beginning, Beijing has demonstrat­ed a consistent preference for shelving difference­s.

Contrary to the Japanese and US allegation­s, our ADIZ was actually intended to reduce misjudgmen­ts and avoid possible conflicts, and the so-called threats to civilian flights are just Abe’s crazy hyperbole aimed at deflecting blame.

Instead of echoing Japan’s illicit request that we rescind the ADIZ, Biden should try to enlighten the Japanese that it can actually become what our Defense Ministry envisages: “a zone of cooperatio­n, not confrontat­ion”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China