China Daily (Hong Kong)

Regulators crack whip on unruly market

Reforms on main board and the Growth Enterprise Market create place for third listing platform

- By LIN WENJIE in Hong Kong cherrylin@chinadaily­hk.com

Emphasizin­g its willingnes­s to embark on reform, Hong Kong’s market watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), halted five Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) on the Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) in just one month.

Observers said this reflected the regulator’s intention to bring about quick changes to listing rules in the city ’s securities market.

The reform may contain three main components — first to have two committees draft the specific change plans; second, to tighten IPO rules; and third, to set up a new listing board.

Of the five GEM candidates that delayed IPOs, the SFC queried three for “not ensuring the conditions for an open market” as well as “orderly, informed and fair trading” in the relevant securities at the time of listing.

The three companies later announced they would let their GEM listing plans lapse.

A fourth firm, Xiangxing Internatio­nal, is a Xiamenbase­d intra-port service and logistics service provider. It announced postponeme­nt of its IPO, which the SFC saw as being “not in the public interest”.

Engineerin­g subcontrac­t o r G M E G r o u p Ho l d i n g s was successful­ly listed, but trading was suspended on its Feb 22 debut because of wild price swings.

The company surged 542 percent in morning trade from its IPO price of HK$0.54 per share to HK$3.47 per share on turno v e r o f H K $ 6 9 .47 m i l l i o n , leading the regulator to think “that there may not be an open marke t in the trading of the shares”, GME said in its statement released after the suspension.

Price volatility is common f o r G E M s t o c k s . Inv e s t o r s s ay t h e y h av e s e e n n e w l y listed small-cap stocks skyrocket before they blow up into a spectacula­r fireworksl­ike bust.

Such speculativ­e bet- ting on penny stocks had put the marke t regulator under heavy pressure. It had “c a u s e d d a m a g e t o Ho n g K o n g ’s r e p u t a t i o n” a s a n internatio­nal financial center, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd Chief Executive Charles Li Xiaojia said last month.

He s a i d H K E x s u p p o r t - ed the SFC ’s recent ac tion against the rigging on the city’s small-cap shares.

The problem has speculatio­n on listed “shell companies” at its root. “Some companies just want to go public to get a public trading status, waiting to be sold via a reverse merger, as they don’t have profitable business operations,” said Edward Au, co-leader of National Public Offering Group from Deloitte China. “The regulator must determine whether a listing applicant truly wants to raise funds or not,” he said.

Shell companies can be sold to firms which, otherwise, would not be able to raise funds on the open market, many from the Chinese mainland.

Ma r ke t s o u r c e s s a i d t h e price for a GEM shell company was HK$350 million, and HK$600 million on the main board.

GEM board listing requiremen­ts let these shell companies with highly concentrat­ed share holdings and a small shareholde­r base list. As a result, their share prices can be manipulate­d easily.

“Generally, 80 to 90 percent of the issued shares of a newly listed company on the GEM are concentrat­ed in the hands of five biggest investors,” Au said, “making its share price easy to manipulate”.

Statistics show that firstday returns of IPOs on the GEM board were 118 percent in 2013, 144 percent in 2014, and an astonishin­g 739 percent in 2015.

In response, the SFC and HKEx jointly proposed regulatory reform in June last year, resulting in, as the first step, the setting up of a committee on listing policy and another on listing rules.

This was followed by a three-month public consultati­on that ended in September last year. The two committees are still digesting the reform suggestion­s they have gathered.

The SFC is expected to raise IPO requiremen­ts by lifting the minimum operating cash flow from HK$20 million to HK$30 million, and requiring at least 10 percent of the issued shares to be open subscripti­on, according to local media.

Higher requiremen­ts would ease share-price vola-

The regulator must determine whether a listing applicant truly wants to raise funds or not.”

co-leader of National Public Offering Group from Deloitte China

tility which would, in turn, benefit the listed company itself. Companies would find it difficult to conduct market operations during wild swings of their share prices, Au pointed out.

It is still too early to see any specific changes but Au said “when they come, they will give an overall facelift” t o Ho n g K o n g ’s f i n a n c i a l market.

If requiremen­ts were raised in both the GEM and main board, the change would create a need for a new listing board.

HKEx had already outlined its ideas for a third exchange this year to possibly target institutio­nal investors and adopt more innovative listing standards. But the specific set-up time has yet to be disclosed.

T h e S A R g o v e r n m e n t ’s 2017/18 Budget also stressed the need to improve the quality of Hong Kong’s securities market.

 ?? ANTHONY KWAN / BLOOMBERG ?? Analysts believe Hong Kong’s market watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission, has shown its intention to bring about quick changes to listing rules in the city’s securities market.
ANTHONY KWAN / BLOOMBERG Analysts believe Hong Kong’s market watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission, has shown its intention to bring about quick changes to listing rules in the city’s securities market.
 ??  ?? Edward Au,
Edward Au,

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China