China Daily (Hong Kong)

US violates WTO rules, breaks pledge

- Yu Xiang The author is a research fellow and director of the Division of American Economic Studies at the Institute of American Studies, China Institutes of Contempora­ry Internatio­nal Relations.

On Dec 1, the United States formally informed the World Trade Organizati­on that it opposes granting China market economy status. This breaches its promise that China would automatica­lly be granted market economy status by 2016.

According to that promise, since China joined the WTO in 2001, it should have been granted the market economy status by the end of 2016, the same treatment that is enjoyed by more than 160 member economies. It has long been clear that trade and economic relations between the US and China will not develop smoothly during the US presidency of Donald Trump.

This was reinforced during his recent trip to Asia, when he failed to express his support for the world trade system. On the contrary, in speech after speech, Trump denounced the WTO and the multilater­al trade and investment arrangemen­ts that the US establishe­d following World War II to regulate conflicts among economic competitor­s.

The WTO is the global trading body that administer­s the rules that govern cross-border commerce and presides over negotiatio­ns aimed at further trade liberaliza­tion. But Trump sees the rulings of a Geneva-based group of experts as an infringeme­nt upon US authority. During his Asia trip, Trump categorica­lly vowed to “aggressive­ly defend American sovereignt­y over trade policy”, pursue an uncompromi­sing “America First” agenda that requires every country to substantia­lly reduce its trade surpluses with the US.

When the US opens up its own markets, other countries tend to do the same. If the US were to embrace protection­ism, other countries would follow suit. If Trump discards the WTO before he finishes bilateral trade facilitati­on agreements, it would be a disaster for the US internatio­nally. There are no bilateral freetrade agreements between the US and seven of its top 10 trade partners. When the US leaves the WTO, it will find that it is totally isolated and trapped among trade barriers and disputes that the WTO is striving to eliminate and mediate.

What is anticipate­d now is a US attack on the global trading system. China believes such a move will come soon.

As a prelude, on Nov 28, the US Commerce Department launched anti-dumping and antisubsid­y investigat­ions into Chinese alloy aluminum sheet imports, the first time such investigat­ions have been initiated by the government in decades.

As to why the US refuses to grant China the market economy status, there are two interpreta­tions: First, the US wants to use it as a tool to combat Chinese companies, since not granting China market economy status would allow Washington to maintain high anti-dumping duties on Chinese goods, which would put the viability of some Chinese industries at risk.

Second, the US wants to form a coalition with the European Union against China. WTO hearings of China’s “non-market economy” dispute with the EU is around the corner, and a statement of the US’ opposition to granting China market economy status was submitted as a third-party brief in support of the EU’ s case.

Obviously, the US and the EU are blind to the great achievemen­ts in reform that China has made since joining the WTO. Now the prices and costs in China are determined under market economy conditions. At the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China it was decided to let the market play the decisive role in the allocation of resources.

China will negotiate a solution with the US and the EU, but it will be very difficult, considerin­g the complexity of market economy status. Meanwhile, China will continue to file complaints to the WTO. Whether the WTO will respond positively and draw an objective conclusion is sure to influence its credibilit­y.

Obviously, the US and the EU are blind to the great achievemen­ts in reform that China has made since joining the WTO.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China