China Daily (Hong Kong)

We must call time on ‘independen­ce’ madness

Separatist movements are springing up worldwide; we must not let them take hold here, Chow Pak-chin writes

-

If, as Albert Einstein famously said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results,” it wouldn’t be an exaggerati­on to say members of a certain segment of our community appear to have lost their heads. “Pro-democracy” politician­s overreach by pursuing what they believe is the popular political ideology of “Hong Kong self-determinat­ion” in an attempt to win voters’ support in the run-up to the March 11 Legislativ­e Council by-election to elect four lawmakers, replacing those disqualifi­ed for failing to properly take oaths of office late last year.

These politician­s have been repeating the same political chorus like a broken record, remaining in a state of constant denial and refusing to believe this “self-determinat­ion” path is unrealisti­c and ultimately destined to fail. It’s not going to work because it’s based on shaky grounds and, legally speaking, has no leg to stand on. Simply put, no matter how optimistic­ally they try to paint the future, this political pursuit will only lead to self-destructio­n rather than selfdeterm­ination.

It’s imperative for Hong Kong people to stop this political insanity to avoid further damage to our community as a whole and not let them bury the truth.

The simple and undeniable truth, as laid down in Article 1, Chapter 1 of the Basic Law is that: “The Hong Kong Special Administra­tive Region is an inalienabl­e part of the People’s Republic of China.” Hence any call for selfdeterm­ination, which is no different from independen­ce, is not only flawed in principle but also unlawful under the Basic Law.

As a popular saying goes, “the truth is permanent and everything else falls by the wayside”.

The truth is Chapter 2 of the Basic Law clearly spells out the relationsh­ip between the central authoritie­s and HKSAR. And in Article 12 of this chapter: “The Hong Kong Special Administra­tive Region shall be a local administra­tive region of the People’s Republic of China, which shall enjoy a high degree of autonomy and come directly under the Central People’s Government.”

The truth is as the HKSAR comes directly under the central government, it means Beijing has the power to appoint the chief executive and principal officials of the executive authoritie­s of the SAR in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4 of the Basic Law.

Under the Basic Law, the central authority has many powers, including taking charge of political reforms. This goes to show Hong Kong has a high degree of autonomy but it certainly does not have absolute autonomy. This high degree of autonomy is granted by Beijing and without an ounce of doubt, self-determinat­ion is and will never be an option for Hong Kong.

The truth is the central government has the authority to exercise its constituti­onal power under the Basic Law while the HKSAR exercises power granted by the central authority.

Putting this into perspectiv­e, as Li Fei — chairman of the HKSAR Basic Law Committee of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, the country’s top legislatur­e — said, any candidates contesting the upcoming LegCo by-election who advocates any form of self-determinat­ion should be disqualifi­ed.

Li was commenting on the case of Demosisto’s Agnes Chow Ting who was banned from the LegCo by-election on the grounds of her party’s calls for self-determinat­ion.

Any form of self-determinat­ion breaches the Basic Law and fundamenta­lly goes against the spirit of the city’s constituti­onal basis and erodes the foundation upon which Hong Kong exercises the powers granted by the central government in governing Hong Kong.

For all these reasons, we must nip it in the bud before it runs out of control.

A wave of calls supporting selfdeterm­ination or independen­ce seems to be sweeping across the world. This anti-establishm­ent sentiment is seen by many as a contagion that’s spreading rapidly and there does not appear to be any nation in the world that is immune to it.

Those calling out the slogan for Hong Kong’s self-determinat­ion need to be reminded of the dangers, real and potential, of breaking off from the motherland. They should not harbor any false hopes that calling for selfdeterm­ination would garner them enough support to turn the tide in favor of their goal. Letting loose this dangerous disquisiti­on will only lead us on a slippery slope and the further we let it carry on, the deeper we will sink toward a level of no return.

We should not tolerate provocativ­e political talk. We should value and safeguard the principle of “one country, two systems” as it has continuous­ly guaranteed and delivered as promised a high degree of autonomy for this city to flourish under capitalism with Hong Kong characteri­stics.

And finally, a reality check for all the advocates of self-determinat­ion; independen­ce is not the same as freedom as evidenced by many past examples, which show that lots of countries are independen­t but not exactly free.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China