China Daily (Hong Kong)

Pro-establishm­ent camp emerge as winners in poll

- David Wong The author is an executive member of the New People’s Party and former civil servant.

The March 11 Legislativ­e Council by-election to refill four of the six seats vacated by disqualifi­ed legislator­s-elect yielded surprising results. Prior to the poll almost all commentato­rs predicted the opposition camp would win all three geographic­al constituen­cy seats. After all, the pro-establishm­ent camp had never won a one-to-one direct LegCo election before, as it used to secure just 40 percent of votes against the opposition camp’s 60 percent, they said. The vote ratio was more or less true in many past LegCo elections but the gap has narrowed down to about 45:55 in recent years.

As such, the victory of Vincent Cheng Wing-shun in Kowloon West was truly historic and remarkable. At the same time, the vote share gap in the Hong Kong Island geographic­al constituen­cy narrowed further to 47:51 this time, which was unheard of before. In New Territorie­s East the opposition camp managed to win but for the first time failed to garner more than half the votes. Assuming 60 percent of the votes won by independen­t candidate Christine Fong Kwok-shan were from pro-establishm­ent supporters, which is highly possible since she used to be a Liberal Party member, the vote ratio between the rival camps would be 48:52. Compared with the 2016 general election, the pro-establishm­ent camp has made outstandin­g progress. It is fair to say the pro-establishm­ent camp was the real winner of this by-election and the opposition barely secured a pyrrhic victory.

Overall, the by-election results were a pleasant surprise to the pro-establishm­ent camp. A few observatio­ns can help explain the results. First of all, as in all previous LegCo elections, the latest by-election was dominated by political issues and ideologica­l contests, and was a reflection of the popularity of the local government. This time, the biggest topic was no doubt the disqualifi­cation of LegCo members. The co-location arrangemen­t at the Kowloon West Station of the Express Rail Link, unauthoriz­ed building works found at Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng Yeuk-wah’s house and controvers­y over “Hong Kong independen­ce” advocacy were all topics the opposition camp did their best to exploit. In other words, the overall political environmen­t was not unfavorabl­e to the opposition camp, except for the government now enjoying a higher approval rating. After the illegal “Occupy Central” movement failed in 2014, the opposition parties constantly blamed the small turnout in political rallies on their supporters’ sense of frustratio­n. Now that they even failed to mobilize their supporters to vote for them, there was certainly more to the phenomenon than meets the eye.

In fact, many opposition supporters were infuriated when some LegCo members insulted our country, since we are all Chinese despite everything. The other small tricks pulled off during the oath-taking ceremony were either inconseque­ntial or meaningles­s. And anyone with common sense would not believe the co-location arrangemen­t would endanger the people of Hong Kong. It was also completely ludicrous to claim that Chinese mainland law-enforcemen­t officers would secretly leave the Kowloon West terminal to capture ordinary citizens. The fact that the opposition conjure up so many such false claims to terrify voters suggests they live within their own fantasy bubble. It reaches a point where they cannot see that tens of thousands of people cross the border to and from Shenzhen everyday uneventful­ly, and the lives of residents on both sides are becoming more and more intertwine­d.

Secondly, the primary election held by opposition parties was extremely brutal and ugly since they believed victory was certain. The primary election was biased by design since there were few polling stations and the votes cast were small in number. What was most outrageous and disgracefu­l was that when the primary election result was not what the mastermind­s behind the opposition camp wanted, they simply appointed a new candidate out of the blue and declared him the genuine “Plan B”. This charade should clear up any doubts in people’s minds as to the true nature of the opposition parties. They keep chanting the slogan of wanting “real universal suffrage”, yet they orchestrat­ed and executed a fake primary election among themselves. Another disturbing episode occurred when the opposition lost the Kowloon West constituen­cy and started to play the blame game. The mastermind­s, supported by a powerful propaganda machine, firmly placed the blame on a seasoned member, whom they had illegitima­tely deprived of his candidacy despite his good performanc­e in the primary election. Many who have followed events closely, as a number of voters did, would have surely felt a chill down their spines.

Last but not least, in stark contrast with the opposition, the pro-establishm­ent camp was unpreceden­tedly united and faced the tough by-election battle together. This was probably one of the reasons for their good performanc­e in the by-election. Since the election results were so close this time, the possible upcoming by-elections for Kowloon West and New Territorie­s East will undoubtedl­y be more fiercely contested and more voters are likely to come out to vote.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China