China Daily (Hong Kong)

AI era calls for overhaul of undergradu­ate education

- Simon Ho The author is president of Hang Seng Management College.

The government and technology sector have recently stepped up efforts to promote innovation and technology. In the 2018-19 Budget, the government even earmarked HK$50 billion to support related projects with an emphasis on four major areas including artificial intelligen­ce. In recent years, technologi­cal developmen­t of AI has advanced rapidly and humankind has entered the era of smart machines. AI will have a huge impact on people’s work and life and it has also become a much-discussed topic.

In October last year Hang Seng Management College organized the world premiere of 7%, a documentar­y film by the award-winning director Zhou Hao, and a pre-screening workshop. The film was a story about the AI Go computer program “Jue Yi” created by Tencent early last year. In 2016, Google’s AI AlphaGo defeated a 9-dan Go master; and Jue Yi last year defeated world-renowned Go champion Ke Jie in 13 consecutiv­e games. This stunned the Go world. In some applicatio­n areas, the computing power of AI is comparativ­e to or has already outperform­ed that of the human brain.

Profession­al Go players were perhaps the first group of people to experience the subversive impact of AI on human lives. Their situation today leads us to think about the future relationsh­ip between AI and humanity. The documentar­y was named 7% because the Japanese Go player Hideyuki Fujisawa once said: “If there are 100 ways to play Go, I only know seven of them”. Does human understand­ing of Go and the world really take up 7 percent? Will AI turn many people redundant and useless? How can AI raise human values and improve their wellbeing?

This year, Hang Seng Management College organized the President Forum on its founders’ day on March 16, exploring the future of liberal arts education in a globalized and technologi­cal context. The forum invited Professor Jeffrey S. Lehman, the inaugural vice-chancellor of New York University Shanghai and the former president of Cornell University, as guest speaker. He also discussed this important topic with me. As leaders of universiti­es, we are obliged to think about how these developmen­ts can reshape undergradu­ate education so young people in the 21st century can integrate into the new era of science and technology. This will help them have the necessary competenci­es to meet future challenges in work and life.

AI has already been used in domains such as robots, voice recognitio­n, machine translatio­n, human face recognitio­n, self-driving cars, unmanned stores, credit risk assessment, financialm­arket transactio­ns, medical diagnosis, drug discovery, education management and media and advertisin­g. The use of multi-layer neural networks, big data, cloud computing and super hardware enables the system to undertake deep learning on its own.

AI technology can bring us convenienc­e, comfort and well-being, including the eliminatio­n of intermedia­ries and also more personaliz­ed experience­s. Nonetheles­s, it brings hidden concerns, including the loss of middle- and low-level jobs, infringeme­nt of personal privacy, unreasonab­le program logics, more social inequality, more alienated relationsh­ips, and ethical and legal disputes. It is not easy to achieve a balance between safeguardi­ng individual social rights and expediting AI developmen­t. Excessive government regulation will also impede innovation­s.

Humankind also faces the inevitable contradict­ion. On one hand, they are worried AI will be too smart, beyond human control or even cause catastroph­e. On the other hand, humans blame AI for not being smart enough. AI is largely constraine­d by manual coding; hence, AI may also make mistakes. Besides, if the input data is under-represente­d or biased, AI’s computing or judgment will go wrong. Therefore, people should be cautious when applying AI to predict results and should not rely entirely on the result of AI computing for decisionma­king in important domains. Human operations, monitoring and judgment are still critical.

Stephen Hawking warned earlier that the biggest threat to humankind comes from progress in technology, including artificial intelligen­ce. However, AI does not obscure the fact that humans are not trying to stop scientific and technologi­cal advancemen­t. Instead, they must recognize and control the risks with a human-centered approach, and realize AI’s contributi­on to human society.

After all, artificial intelligen­ce was invented by humans. The algorithm behind it was designed by humans and it is a tool to serve people. It is difficult for AI to completely replace human intelligen­ce, imaginatio­n, emotional feelings, care, aesthetic judgment, spirit of inclusion etc. Therefore saying “AI replaces people” or “AI outperform­s humans” is still far-fetched at this stage and there is no need to worry about this too much. In this new era of AI, the greatest manpower requiremen­t will be jobs that are unstructur­ed and cannot be replaced by AI, especially those that can lead AI in a constructi­ve direction.

Higher education institutio­ns have all along been strengthen­ing AI teaching and research but we don’t need many of the next generation to become AI experts. A basic understand­ing of AI and its limitation­s will suffice. In contrast, in order to cope with future life-long changes and challenges of work and life confidentl­y, I believe that institutio­ns have the obligation to ensure university students of the iGeneratio­n are equipped with the following five core transferab­le human qualities (5C qualities):

Critical thinking — Cross-disciplina­ry, rational, analytical, respecting different opinions, independen­t judgment

Creativity — More contact with different people and matters, establishi­ng an ideas bank, associatio­n, entreprene­urial spirit

Caring — Human-centered, interperso­nal communicat­ion and cooperatio­n, empathy, cross-cultural competenci­es

Character — Integrity, equality, justice Community engagement — Caring for and contributi­ng to society, strive for win-win

Lehman and I both agree that the revised liberal arts education model is the most effective way to cultivate students’ key qualities as mentioned above. Higher education institutio­ns should reform their curriculum, pedagogy and also students’ all-round growth, structure, culture etc. This is in order to give students a more self-directed and individual­ized learning environmen­t.

When promoting new developmen­ts of technology, we should not deviate from human nature, and should not lack human vision and qualities. Liberal arts institutio­ns in the region should integrate humanities with technology, and combine the cultural values of East and West.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China