China Daily (Hong Kong)

Currency manipulato­r claim shot down by IMF report

-

The Internatio­nal Monetary Fund said in a report on Friday that the yuan’s exchange rate was “broadly in line with medium-term fundamenta­ls” and China’s central bank has made few foreign exchange interventi­ons in recent years, clarifying that China is not as the United States has claimed a currency manipulato­r.

The IMF said that the country’s external position in 2018 was “broadly in line with the level consistent with medium-term fundamenta­ls and desirable policies”.

The organizati­on also welcomed China’s efforts to reform its exchange rate regime to make the yuan more flexible, according to its report released after its latest Article IV consultati­on with China that concluded on July 31.

The clarificat­ion by the IMF indicates that the US Treasury’s claim on Aug 5 that China was engaging in currency manipulati­on was nothing but troublemak­ing.

As a developing and transition­al economy, China has been reforming its currency exchange rate management regime in the past years, gradually liberalizi­ng its currency so that its value can be increasing­ly determined by market forces.

Its currency stance has been consistent. It is committed to making the yuan more reflective of market forces. It is therefore normal for the yuan to experience two-way fluctuatio­ns.

China has vowed repeatedly that it will not use competitiv­e devaluatio­n to support its exports and as the IMF report shows, it has kept its promise.

In fact, the yuan had appreciate­d 38 percent

in nominal terms and by 47 percent in terms of the real effective exchange rate from early 2005 to this June, making it the strongest currency among those of the G20 members.

China’s efforts to liberalize the yuan cannot have escaped the notice of the US government. But with the motive of impeding China’s developmen­t in any way it can, the US government has used its Exchange Rate and Internatio­nal Economic Policy Coordinati­on Act of 1988, which is deemed subjective and without quantitati­ve standards, to nonetheles­s define China as a currency manipulato­r to pave the way for future anti-China moves.

That it has opted to shun its Trade Facilitati­on and Trade Enforcemen­t Act of 2015, which at least has objective quantitati­ve standards, just betrays the intentions behind it singling out China as a “currency manipulato­r”.

A variety of economists and experts, among them some from the US, have criticized the US government of failing to respect the facts by taking the yuan’s fluctuatio­n in a very short period of time to define China as a currency manipulato­r regardless of the most recent criteria for currency manipulati­on set out in its 2015 act.

Such an arbitrary and politicize­d move sets a harmful precedent that will have a profound impact on the internatio­nal economic and trade order. It disrupts the normal order of internatio­nal competitio­n and signals that the US will use any excuse to irresponsi­bly crack down on any country it considers a rival.

The internatio­nal community should join hands and stand together to safeguard the internatio­nal economic order.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China