China Daily (Hong Kong)

Building a better intra-Party accountabi­lity mechanism

- Liu Dongchao

In the new era of socialism with Chinese characteri­stics, the Communist Party of China has witnessed some major changes. First, the number of CPC members increased from 82.6 million in 2011 to 90.59 million by late 2018, and primary Party organizati­ons grew from 4.03 to 4.61 million. Which means the work to strengthen intra-Party management has substantia­lly increased.

Second, the pressure on and challenges facing the Party have acquired new characteri­stics and forms. Accordingl­y, Party organizati­ons and cadres at various levels have shouldered more responsibi­lities, and thanks to the implementa­tion of the “comprehens­ively strengthen­ing Party discipline” policy, relevant regulation­s and systems have become more targeted, specific and optimal.

Besides, as leading Party cadres born in the 1950s retire, younger cadres with different abilities, responsibi­lities and spirit, and understand­ing of Party discipline are gradually taking center stage. Against this backdrop, building an intra-Party discipline and accountabi­lity system has become even more important, necessitat­ing a revision of the Regulation­s of the CPC on Accountabi­lity by the Party Central Committee.

To begin with, new intra-Party accountabi­lity regulation­s will ensure the implementa­tion of the CPC Central Committee’s major decisions. A basic goal of the revision is to urge Party organizati­ons and leading cadres at all levels to remain true to the Party spirit, always keep their mission in mind, fulfill their responsibi­lities, be loyal to the Party, and honestly perform their duties.

Also, the new regulation­s should comply with the requiremen­ts of comprehens­ively strengthen­ing Party discipline, which is a major strategy made by the Party Central Committee after the 18th CPC National Congress in 2012, and a guarantee to build a moderately prosperous society, comprehens­ively deepen reform and advance the rule of law.

The accountabi­lity system is crucial for strengthen­ing Party discipline. As such, Party organizati­ons should assume the primary responsibi­lity of implementi­ng the Party regulation­s, and discipline department­s should fulfill their supervisio­n duties. Plus, Party institutio­ns should not shy away from demanding accountabi­lity, and show zero-tolerance toward those breaking accountabi­lity regulation­s, as that would help identify and expel cadres indulging in corruption.

Besides, the new intra-Party accountabi­lity regulation­s are expected to provide the right guidance to Party members. But despite huge progress being made in strengthen­ing intra-Party accountabi­lity, certain problems related to accountabi­lity have surfaced. For instance, a deputy director of a prefecture-level government was issued a warning by the standing committee of the discipline inspection commission there for not answering the four phone calls the provincial inspection team made in a span of just four minutes. This is a typical example of seeking excessive accountabi­lity.

In some cases, officials in charge at the local government were held accountabl­e for something absolutely unrelated to them. More ironically, a civil servant was censured for drinking milk during work hours while teachers were criticized for going Dutch to pay for a dinner during a holiday. This kind of accountabi­lity is accountabi­lity just for accountabi­lity’s sake.

The new accountabi­lity system should resolve such issues. And Party organizati­ons and leading cadres should be consistent when it comes to fulfilling their responsibi­lities and duties, combine strict management with genuine concern for Party members, lay equal emphasis on incentive and restraint, and implement the accountabi­lity system according to rules. They should also pay greater attention to complex issues.

Moreover, the fault correction system should be improved and provisions for exemption clarified to extend systemic support to cadres who dare to implement Party rules. Plus, cadres that have performed excellentl­y after being hauled up for committing mistakes should be allowed to serve the Party provided they meet certain requiremen­ts. This will encourage cadres to perform better and be more accountabl­e.

It should be noted that accountabi­lity is not the ultimate goal, but a tool to help strengthen the Party’s structure and make new achievemen­ts. Which means the accountabi­lity system should strengthen Party work and reflect the Party’s aspiration­s and beliefs.

The author is a professor at the Party School of the CPC Central Committee. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

The accountabi­lity system is crucial for strengthen­ing Party discipline. As such, Party organizati­ons should assume the primary responsibi­lity of implementi­ng the Party regulation­s ...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China