China Daily (Hong Kong)

People-centric policy key to saving lives

- Harvey Dzodin The author is a senior fellow at Beijingbas­ed think tank Center for China and Globalizat­ion. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

China may be the safest place on the planet now. Eight months after its arduous battle against the COVID-19 pandemic, it has largely controlled the highly infectious disease. On Tuesday morning China held a meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing to commend the role models in the country’s fight against the COVID19 epidemic.

Now the Chinese mainland has only a handful of imported cases, which were detected at ports of entry thanks to rigorous anti-pandemic measures including testing, and the infected people were duly quarantine­d. The government’s confidence level is so high that last Thursday Beijing reopened internatio­nal flights.

This is not just some happy talk unrelated to reality, but forged in the crucible of real experience gained during an unpreceden­ted crisis.

Under the leadership of President Xi Jinping, and the Communist Party of China, the entire government apparatus including the civil and military authoritie­s was quickly brought to bear in the fight against the pandemic. Doctors, nurses, other health workers and front-line responders, and Party cadres were mobilized in Wuhan and elsewhere to help contain the virus. Some of those even sacrificed their lives for the larger good.

Everything may not have been done perfectly. But how could any country do everything perfectly amid such an existentia­l crisis?

Yet Wuhan has sprung back to normalcy, as is the rest of China. Swimming pools are crowded. Restaurant­s are overbooked and schools have re-opened. From the middle of Europe, China seems like a fictional alternate universe.

Here in Vienna where I live, as COVID-19 numbers are rising, many businesses are permanentl­y shuttered despite financial support from the government. Virtually nobody maintains social distancing. Face masks are generally not worn, except in the few places they are mandatory such as groceries and health facilities. And to think Austria is one of the more successful countries in the fight against the virus.

France and Spain, for example, are close to their record highs in the spring of this year. There’s fear in Europe that the double-whammy of flu and COVID19 will overwhelm not only the most vulnerable population­s like the elderly, but also hospitals and healthcare facilities.

So what is to be done? If there ever was a right time for it, universal global cooperatio­n should be the order of the day. Many countries are in fact cooperatin­g through the World Health Organizati­on’s COVAX initiative, which is working on up to 19 or more vaccines, the world’s largest, most diverse vaccine portfolio. There are 80 potentiall­y self-financing countries that have made non-binding expression­s of interest in joining 92 lowand middle-income countries. The goal is to prevent “vaccine nationalis­m” by not only making these vaccines a public good accessible to rich and poor countries alike, but also prioritizi­ng access to those most in need, including the elderly and other most vulnerable groups, in addition to front-line responders.

China has been taking an active part in the initiative. As Foreign Ministry spokespers­on Hua Chunying said, Chinese authoritie­s and vaccine producers held a videoconfe­rence with the WHO and other stakeholde­rs on Sept 3 to discuss the particular­s of China’s involvemen­t. But one country, which for seven decades was the go-to leader in times of global crises, has been missing in action, as it has turned inward, and is spending more time and energy in playing the blame game, than working together. Sadly, that is my country, the United States of America.

The US, with 4 percent of the world’s population, accounts for almost 25 percent of the COVID-19 cases: more than 6.1 million cases and over 187,500 deaths. In fact, the latest model of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation shows that by Jan 1, the number of deaths in the US could rise to 410,000 — more than of all US combatant deaths in World War II. To divert attention and to shift the blame, the US administra­tion has been demonizing China since April.

Of course, the US isn’t sitting still. On May 15, it announced “Operation Warp Speed”, a $10 billion program to develop and deliver 300 million safe and effective vaccine doses by January. Last week, however, US states were suddenly ordered to prepare for mass inoculatio­ns on Nov 1, just a couple of days before the presidenti­al election.

And the White House further isolated itself from the internatio­nal community by announcing that, “the United States will continue to engage our internatio­nal partners to ensure we defeat this virus, but we will not be constraine­d by multilater­al organizati­ons influenced by the corrupt World Health Organizati­on and China”. Many experts see this as a childish, churlish and potentiall­y fatal mistake, akin to not having an insurance policy in case none of the US vaccines are found to be effective and safe — which can be a possibilit­y, given the compressed timeline for vaccine developmen­t, the previous record being four years.

How the US would engage “with internatio­nal partners” is unclear since it has excluded itself from the WHO-affiliated COVAX program and its 172 country partners. The only explanatio­n was provided in June by the US’ Food and Drug Administra­tion’s Peter Marks who said that it’s analogous to an oxygen mask on a depressuri­zed airplane: “You’re going to put on your own first and then help others”. Translatio­n: “America first” and a dose of vaccine nationalis­m.

How much this transactio­nal administra­tion that routinely accuses its allies of constantly “ripping off” the US would charge is anyone’s guess, but it is unlikely to be a public good. In any case, I look forward to getting on an airplane and returning to the safety and stimulatio­n of China.

 ?? SONG CHEN / CHINA DAILY ??
SONG CHEN / CHINA DAILY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China