China Daily (Hong Kong)

EU court rejects mass data retention by govts

- By JULIAN SHEA in London julian@mail.chinadaily­uk.com

The European Union’s highest court has ruled that member states cannot routinely collect internet and mobile phone data on citizens, in a setback for government­s looking to monitor usage.

The European Court of Justice ruled that although it was permissibl­e in some moments of genuine threat to national security, demanding that telecoms companies get involved in “general and indiscrimi­nate transmissi­on or retention of traffic data and location data” was contrary to EU law.

Several civil rights groups had brought the case, highlighti­ng surveillan­ce operations in the United Kingdom, France and Belgium that they believed oversteppe­d the mark.

The specific legislatio­n they were challengin­g was the UK’s Investigat­ory Powers Act, commonly referred to as the Snooper’s Charter, which became law in 2016, a law passed in Belgium in the same year about data retention, and a decree from the previous year in France relating to the intelligen­ce services.

There was an exception to the rule when “a member state is facing a serious threat to national security that proves to be genuine and present or foreseeabl­e, that member state may derogate from the obligation to ensure the confidenti­ality of data relating to electronic communicat­ions,” the court said.

But even then, safeguards must be in place, subject to legal or independen­t review.

“In these turbulent times, (the ruling) serves as a reminder that no government should be above the law,” said Caroline Wilson Palow, legal director of Privacy Internatio­nal, one of the organizati­ons that brought the case.

Limits needed

“Democratic societies must place limits and controls on the surveillan­ce powers of our police and intelligen­ce agencies.

“While (they) … play a very important role in keeping us safe, they must do so in line with certain safeguards to prevent abuses of their very considerab­le power.”

The ruling has also come as a blow to the UK government in Brexit negotiatio­ns, as it attempts to build a postBrexit relationsh­ip with the EU.

The UK is hoping to secure a so-called adequacy decision covering data transfer with the bloc, similar to the arrangemen­ts the EU has with countries including Japan, Israel and Switzerlan­d.

Brussels compares individual countries’ data privacy regulation­s with its own, before deciding if it is happy to share data without additional safeguards, and certain standards must be met for this to happen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China