China Daily (Hong Kong)

Systemic reform necessary to handle misconduct of educators

- Paul Yeung The author is senior research officer of the One Country Two Systems Research Institute. The views do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

The recent controvers­ies surroundin­g the profession­al misconduct of some teachers have drawn widespread public concern about the ethics and profession­al integrity of those educators, whose political indoctrina­tion will have a negative impact on the entire education system and the next generation. These controvers­ies provide an opportunit­y for us to discuss how to build a more competent system that handles the profession­al conduct of teachers.

The public’s right to know is one of the subjects that needs to be addressed. According to government statistics from June 2019 to May 2020, there were about 10 tertiary educators and about 100 primary and secondary school teachers arrested in public incidents. Meanwhile, from June 2019 to August 2020, the Education Bureau received 247 complaints against teachers who allegedly engaged in profession­al misconduct. It has revoked the registrati­on of one of the teachers and reprimande­d 21 others. However, the basic informatio­n of those who violated the law or code of conduct, such as their names and workplaces, was not disclosed. As a result, the public, especially parents, were left unable to know if their children were adequately protected from those misbehavin­g teachers.

In addition, there are clearly shortfalls in the mechanism for handling profession­al conduct of educators. For example, the Council on Profession­al Conduct in Education, which is authorized to advise the Permanent Secretary for Education on cases of disputes or alleged profession­al misconduct involving educators, was described in the Report on Review of the Present Framework and Mechanism for Promoting and Upholding Teachers’ Profession­al Conduct, published in 2015, as not having devoted sufficient time and effort to enhancing the profession­al conduct of teachers. In the past 20 years, it processed only 30 out of 436 complaints, or less than 7 percent of the total. Some complaints were withdrawn because the CPCE made them wait for too long.

The public, on the other hand, are doubtful that schools have conducted effective reviews of these cases or taken preventive measures according to the Guidelines for Handling School Complaints, issued by the Education Bureau, which requires schools to “learn from past experience­s, improve their handling of complaints against teachers and avoid similar cases from recurring”. Statistics listed above show that instances of profession­al misconduct associated with social and political movements are not isolated cases, and the problems should be attributed to the education system itself. Schools, rather than individual teachers, should keenly supervise their faculty to prevent such cases from happening again.

The profession­al conduct of teachers has a knock-on effect on the education system. In order to remedy the ailing education sector, systematic reform must happen sooner rather than later. An example of this can be found in the Teaching Regulation Agency of the United Kingdom. The TRA is the executive agency of the Ministry of Education of the British government and runs a Profession­al Conduct Panel through public recruitmen­t to investigat­e teachers suspected of misconduct. When the investigat­ion is complete, the panel will advise on whether the teachers in question should be deregister­ed.

The TRA has clear requiremen­ts on the investigat­ion process and hearings. Once it has decided to conduct investigat­ions, it will not only formally inform the teachers in question and specify the allegation­s against them but also advise them to seek counseling from legal profession­als or union representa­tives. They have a total of four weeks to respond to the allegation, or submit a school investigat­ion report to the TRA to defend themselves. Generally speaking, the hearings conducted by the Profession­al Conduct Panel are open to the public and media. If the alleged misconduct is found to be true, the investigat­ion result will be made public, even if the teachers in question are not deregister­ed in the end.

The sharp increase in the number of teachers found guilty of profession­al misconduct and/or politicall­y-motivated criminal offenses in Hong Kong is evidence the education system has been compromise­d. Schools as well as the education sector should promptly address the problems by all means necessary because they have to be accountabl­e to the public and particular­ly parents for the well-being of students under their watch. It is the only way for the education sector to ensure the public interest against profession­al misconduct and political bias through indoctrina­tion in violation of relevant law and regulation­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China