China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Wrestle not with new law — trade’s good for people

- By SIVA SANKAR Contact the writer at siva@chinadaily.com.cn

Two Chinese female colleagues beat me to watching the Indian/Hindi-language movie Dangal (Chinese title: Shuaijiao Ba Baba or Let’s Wrestle, Dad) on the big screen in Beijing.

The inspiratio­nal movie with Chinese subtitles was released on 7,000 screens on the mainland on May 5, and extended to 3,000 more screens by this week. It’s estimated to have raked in 500 million yuan (more than $72 million) so far, topping box office receipts in a market that also exhibits Chinese, English and other language films.

Dan gal’ s success gladdens me. Not because I’ m an Indian. Not because an elated young, executive-looking-Chinese moviegoer gave me, an Indian stranger, a high-five after a late-evening screening.

I’m glad because Dangal not only confirms that entertainm­ent can be a worthy addition to the growing list of Indian exports to China but gives the lie to the belief that China-India tradewould remain uneven and harm India.

This notion first surfaced late last year when misplaced calls, spiked with a nationalis­tic fervor, erupted in India to boycott Chinese goods due to non-economic issues.

So, the timing of Dangal’s success in China, coincident­al as it is, seems to suggest that in this age of globalizat­ion, cross-border e-commerce, inter-dependent nations and digital wizardry, non-economic issues are a non-issue at the people level.

A law appears to be evolving impercepti­bly: just as water would flow according to gravity and surface slope, so would goods, services, ideas, skills and investment­s flow toward needs, demand and markets. A fine example is the rising number of Indian yoga teachers, software profession­als, teachers and researcher­s in China.

A corollary would be that such “laws” ought not to be messed with using rhetoric or emotion — that will likely result in unintended consequenc­es or prove futile.

During the late 1990s, I used to fancy Woodland, a pricey Canadian-Indian brand of tough, trendy footwear. In February, Woodland tied up with Aokang Internatio­nal to sell its products in the Chinesesal­es will begin this month at 150 outlets. products will be available at Aok an g’ s 5,000 multi-brand retail shops. Next stop: Hong Kong.

To meet Chinese demand, Woodland factories in three Indian states will expand — which means higher investment­s and more jobs.

Clearly, there’s more to China-India trade and investment­s than the dominance of Chinese gadgets, devices and appliances in the Indian market.

This was summed up beautifull­y during the annual “two sessions” in March. Fu Ying, the session’s spokeswoma­n for the national legislatur­e, recalled how one of her colleagues had once mistakenly written $20 billion instead of $2 billion as the value of China-India trade.

“I said at that time that this number was too large, and I could hardly see China-India trade volume reaching $20 billion in the whole of my life. But it reached $70 billion last year (2016).”

Evidence of that spike was on display at the Canton Fair this month where small Indian firms setup stalls to see if they could penetrate the China market. Hafiz ia, an Indian producer of home furnishing­s, carpet san drugs, said it will supply to China’ s Lu olai, which operates nearly 3,000 outlets of a department store chain. Hafiz ia senses opportunit­ies in the rising affluence of China’ s humongous middle class.

At the fair, Zhang Tao, assistant manager of Hangzhou-based Zhejiang Willing Foreign Trading Co, which exports yoga clothing, told Bloomberg News: “In the past, we thought of India and Pakistan as our competitor­s. But now we cooperate with them. They’re welcome to come to China.”

That cooperativ­e spirit, spawned by projects like the Belt and Road Initiative, is now sought to be furthered by India’s top industry chamber, whose Shanghai office will organize a business event next month, to guide Chinese enterprise­s on how to succeed in India.

If a Chinese company learns to succeed in a complex market like India, it would find the going easy in any other economy participat­ing in the Initiative — so goes the logic. Maybe so.

Meanwhile, I’m biding my time to beat my Chinese female colleagues in watching Baahubali-II, another Indian blockbuste­r, on the big screen in Beijing later this year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States