China International Studies (English)

Current Situation of the World Economy and Its Impact on China

- Bi Jiyao

Divergence of major economies both in trend and policy brings new uncertaint­ies to the weakly recovering global economy. Facing a volatile external environmen­t, China still has room for maneuver in its deepening structural reform.

The world economy in 2016 will continue to experience weak recovery momentum. The divergence in performanc­e and policies of the main economies will bring new uncertaint­ies. The external economic environmen­t for the Chinese economy is still complicate­d. In particular, factors such as weak external demand, the rising exchange rate of the US dollar and falling commodity prices will have direct impacts on China’s exports, the renminbi’s exchange rate and cross-border capital flows, thus further affecting China’s economic performanc­e and structural adjustment­s.

Given the current situation and developmen­t momentum, the performanc­e of the world economy in 2016 will likely demonstrat­e the following features and trends:

World economy and trade will maintain low growth rates. After the outbreak of the internatio­nal financial crisis, the world economy recovered quickly after countries implemente­d large scale stimulus policies. However, from 2012 onwards, after the exit from these stimulus policies and the abatement of their effects, the world’s economic growth and the growth in trade fell below 4 percent. According to the main economic indicators of the leading economies since the fourth quarter of 2015, it will be difficult for the world economy and global trade to recover dramatical­ly in the short term. The majority of research institutio­ns and internatio­nal investment banks project a mere 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent growth. According to the latest

World Economic Outlook produced by the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund, the global economy grew by 3.1 percent in 2015 and trade by 2.8 percent, and it forecast they will grow by 3.2 percent and 3.1 percent respective­ly in 2016. Generally speaking, the global economy is still in the period of deep adjustment after the crisis. All countries are making great efforts to advance structural reforms, and accumulati­ng strength for future economic growth. But it will be difficult for the global economy to get escape the low growth rate momentum in the near term. According to the middle-term projection of the IMF, it will be hard for the world economy to grow by 4 percent and trade by 5 percent per annum before 2020. These growth rates would still be lower than the annual average growth of 5 percent and 8 percent respective­ly five years before the financial crisis.

The trends of leading economies will further diverge. Since 2015, the developed economies have generally enjoyed sound recoveries, while the growth rates of emerging markets continue to fall. In terms of the developed countries, the US economy is growing relatively fast. Its consumptio­n, investment and exports, as well as its real estate situation, are improving, and its unemployme­nt rate has dropped below 5 percent. Although the economies of the eurozone and Japan have also improved, their growth rates are low and they face high deflationa­ry pressures. The lasting recovery of the three still faces a number of constraint­s. Although all three leading economies adopted massive fiscal and monetary stimulus policies to boost their economies after the financial crisis, structural reforms in the eurozone and Japan are proceeding slowly. The United States has further consolidat­ed the momentum of its economic recovery through structural adjustment­s. It has implemente­d a revitaliza­tion strategy for its manufactur­ing industry and plans to double its exports, and it has increased its support to energy sources such as shale gas, new technology and new industry. In terms of the internal situations of the emerging markets, Russia and Brazil experience­d recessions due to the dramatic declines in commodity prices such as oil, and the geopolitic­al turbulence. Meanwhile they also face the pressures of capital outflows, devaluatio­n of their currencies and increasing inflation.

Other emerging markets deeply dependent on exports of resources also face difficulti­es to different extents. Although the general situation of emerging markets in Asia is relatively good, their internal growth power is not sufficient because of the slow pace of their structural adjustment­s. The weak external demand is also making it hard for them to continue with their traditiona­l exports driven economic growth models. The Asian emerging economies are generally experienci­ng economic slowdowns, only India continues to enjoy a growth rate of over 7 percent.

The possibilit­y of adjustment­s and fluctuatio­ns in the internatio­nal financial markets is increasing. Since the economic trends of economies differ and their cycles aren’t synchroniz­ed, the monetary policies of the leading economies have deviated. The US Fed has already commenced increasing interest rates. It is widely believed that one more increase will be made in 2016. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan have adopted quantitati­ve easing policies and implemente­d negative interest rate policies to boost economic recovery, which has resulted in increasing returns on US dollar assets and a rise in the US dollar’s exchange rate. These will trigger lasting adjustment­s and fluctuatio­ns in the internatio­nal bond market, exchange market, stock market and commodity market. Internatio­nal capital will flow back to the United States and US dollar assets faster, causing more harm to the resources exporting economies which have been badly hit by the dramatic falls in commodity prices. Capital outflows and currency devaluatio­n will possibly trigger debt crises in the heavily indebted economies, which will intensify the turbulence in the internatio­nal financial market. Stability in the financial market is the important prerequisi­te for stable growth of the world economy. With the persisting weak recovery momentum, the adjustment­s and fluctuatio­ns in the internatio­nal financial market will further restrain the recovery of the world economy.

The prices of commoditie­s are likely to continue to fall. After over a decade of a super bull market, the internatio­nal commodity market is now in the difficult situation of oversupply and a collapse in prices. Currently

the internatio­nal oil price has fallen to $30 per barrel, which is 79 percent lower than the high of $145 per barrel before the financial crisis. The prices of iron ore, cooper, aluminum and zinc have fallen by over 40 percent. In the past, the long-lasting rise in the price of commoditie­s stimulated expanded production of energy and resources. After the financial crisis, the growth rate of the global economy has hovered at a continuous­ly low level. The oversupply of commoditie­s will not be changed in the short term. The major energy and resources exporting countries are not willing to cut production in order to increase fiscal income and maintain fiscal balance. The oversupply in the market will continue to put pressure on the price of commoditie­s. Also the strong US dollar will further constrain the rise of commodity prices denominate­d in the US dollar. Therefore the prices of commoditie­s such as oil still have room to fall. The investment banks anticipate that the oil price in 2016 will continue to fluctuate at low level and the prices of other commoditie­s are unlikely rebound greatly. Although the geopolitic­al turbulence and market speculatio­n will possibly push up the prices of commoditie­s such as oil in short term, they will not change the fundamenta­ls pushing down prices. The low prices of commoditie­s such as oil will intensify the economic difficulti­es of resources exporting countries and reduce the costs of resources importing countries. However, it will also increase the deflationa­ry pressure on resources importing countries. The low prices of commoditie­s, therefore, represent both advantages and disadvanta­ges to the global economy.

The restructur­ing of global industry and adjustment of the industrial chain are accelerati­ng. The developmen­t and industrial­ization process of new technology is speeding up. Emerging industries such as the mobile internet, renewable energy, the internet of things, 3D printing and smart manufactur­ing are developing ever faster. The universal applicatio­n and fusion of the mobile internet, cloud computing and big data in finance, trade, manufactur­ing, education and health care will continue to give birth to new formats, new models and new industries. Traditiona­l industries are undergoing comprehens­ive transforma­tion and upgrading.

As the restructur­ing of global industry speeds up, new types of production organizati­ons, based on informatio­n, intelligen­ce, miniaturiz­ation, decentrali­zation and personaliz­ation, will gradually replace the standardiz­ed plant production organizati­on featuring clear divisions of work and strict specificat­ions. These new types of production organizati­ons will become the mainstream. The internatio­nal division of work will also evolve. On the other hand, the Trans-pacific Partnershi­p (TPP) and Transatlan­tic Trade and Investment Partnershi­p (TTIP), which are dominated by the United States, will expand market access on the basis of pre-establishe­d national treatment and management of negative lists. New topics such as labor standards, environmen­tal protection standards, intellectu­al property, government procuremen­t and competitio­n neutrality, were included in the negotiatio­ns. The TPP and TTIP not only set new levels for the economic rules and the standards for internatio­nal trade, and increase the threshold for developing countries to participat­e in economic globalizat­ion, they will also gradually

change the pattern of the global industry chain and have negative effects on other economies in terms of trade, investment and industry transfer.

The impact of non-economic factors such as geopolitic­s is increasing. After the internatio­nal financial crisis, the global political and economic pattern has undergone profound adjustment­s. As the internatio­nal power balance evolves, the multi-polarizati­on of the world has become evident. The system and structure of global governance continue to change. Facing the accelerate­d rise of the emerging powers, developed countries such as the United States are doing their best to safeguard their global dominance and vested interests. All countries are adjusting their developmen­t strategies and external relations, which is resulting in prominent contradict­ions and intensifie­d competitio­n. Therefore geopolitic­al conflicts are more frequent and the impact of non-economic factors on global economic growth is on rise. Currently, the situation in the Middle East, Us-russian relations, terrorist attacks, the European refugee issue and North Korean nuclear issue are creating uncertaint­ies.

Generally speaking, the Chinese external developmen­t environmen­t is still complicate­d and volatile. On the one hand, peace and developmen­t remain the themes of the times, which is conducive to China’s continuous developmen­t. On the other hand, the profound repercussi­ons of the internatio­nal financial crisis will persist for quite a long time. The world economy is still at the stage of post-crisis adjustment and evolution. The complexity and change in geopolitic­s are resulting in more unstable and unclear factors. The weak growth momentum in global trade and the world economy will not be improved in short term. The challenges posed by the changing external environmen­t are growing.

Currently, the impacts of the changes in the external environmen­t on China’s economic developmen­t are demonstrat­ed largely in the following areas:

First, the weak growth of the world economy and global trade has not only caused external demand to decline, it has also brought the motivation and opportunit­y for China to deepen its structural reforms and quickly

cultivate new growth forces. After the internatio­nal financial crisis, the growth rate of Chinese exports has continuall­y fallen. It was even negative in 2015. The central government’s exports target hasn’t been achieved for four consecutiv­e years. Given the continuing weak momentum in global trade growth China’s exports face many challenges in 2016. As the internatio­nal economic environmen­t changes and China’s economic developmen­t enters its new normal, it cannot rely on the expansion of exports and investment to drive economic growth as before. As China moderately expands its gross demand, it should pay more attention to supply-side structural reform. In particular China should adapt to the structural change of domestic and internatio­nal demand, improve the quality and benefits of its supply system, implement an innovation driven developmen­t strategy, and cultivate new drivers of economic growth. China should adjust and upgrade its industrial structure to promote the quality of its imports and exports, making imports and exports play a better role in promoting economic growth and the optimizati­on and upgrading of its industrial structure.

Second, with a great revolution in science and technology underway, China not only has the opportunit­y to catch up, it also faces the risk of the gap between itself and the developed countries widening, as well as the risk of its traditiona­l industry being eliminated technicall­y. After the internatio­nal financial crisis, the developed countries increased their inputs into R&D and new technology, new products and new industries to occupy the high end of the value chain in future industry developmen­t and internatio­nal competitio­n. The emerging economies also made efforts to push forward structural adjustment­s, undertakin­g internatio­nal industry transfer and paying more attention to developing their manufactur­ing industries. Quite a large gap exists between China and the developed countries in science and technology innovation and the developmen­t of emerging industries. Its traditiona­l cost advantages in manufactur­ing are gradually being lost. The developmen­t of its industry and progress faces competitio­n from both sides. Unless China can effectivel­y push forward innovation in science and technology, along with the adjustment of its industrial structure, the

gap with developed countries will probably further widen. China will be at disadvanta­geous position in the new round of internatio­nal industrial competitio­n, while also facing fierce competitio­n from other emerging economies in traditiona­l manufactur­ing.

Third, the change in supply and demand and falling prices of commoditie­s not only offer advantages to China through lower import costs and increased imports of energy and raw materials, it has also exacerbate­d the difficulti­es for upstream industries and enterprise­s. China now is at the decisive stage of realizing a moderately prosperous society. To speed up industrial­ization and urbanizati­on as well as maintain the sustainabl­e and healthy developmen­t of its economy will increase the gross consumptio­n of energy and resources. Therefore the easing of the supply and demand relationsh­ip and low commodity prices, such as price of oil, are generally conducive to safeguardi­ng the security of its supplies of energy and resources and for reducing developmen­t costs. On the other hand, as it is pursuing economic structural adjustment, domestic demand is expanding slowly and there is a general excess in production capacity, the increasing supplies of resources and their falling prices are also increasing the pressure of competitio­n in upstream industries. The pressure to reduce production capacity and costs is increasing.

Fourth, the struggle for dominance in internatio­nal trade and the competitio­n to write the economic rules not only offer a rare opportunit­y for China to participat­e in global economic governance and rulemaking, they also produce challenges to the deepening of economic system reform and expansion of market openness. In October 2015, the United States dominated the TPP negotiatio­ns. The TPP agreement not only reached an unpreceden­ted high level in market openness and the liberaliza­tion and facilitati­on of trade and investment, it also set new higher standards in areas such as environmen­tal protection, labor standards, competitio­n neutrality, e-commerce and the service industry, including finance. The TPP is playing a demonstrat­ion role in the evolution of the internatio­nal trade and economic rule system. China is now deeply integrated into the world

economy. In order to safeguard the developmen­t rights and interests of China and other developing countries, it must take the initiative to engage with other countries so they can work together to draw up the multilater­al trade and economic rules and push for reform of the internatio­nal economic governance system. China must actively lead the global economic agenda, increase its institutio­nal voice and push the internatio­nal economic order to develop in the direction of equality, justice, win-win cooperatio­n. Meanwhile, China should firmly deepen its reform and opening-up to better adapt to economic globalizat­ion and the evolution of the global economic and trade system. China should use opening-up to promote reform and developmen­t.

Fifth, the complicate­d and changeable geopolitic­s and increasing unstable and unclear factors not only pose potential threats to China’s economic and social developmen­t, but also expand the scope for China in the competitio­n among big powers. As the profound impact of the internatio­nal financial crisis continues to transmit from the areas of the economy, finance, science and technology and industry to society, politics, military, security and internatio­nal governance, the strategic games over the global interest pattern are becoming more intense. Geopolitic­s and power relations are undergoing deep adjustment. There has been a resurgence in terrorism, and hot spots and sensitive issues have frequently emerged. In order to cope with the changes in the external environmen­t, China should not only uphold its principles, handle big power relations carefully, manage and control risks effectivel­y and cultivate a favorable external environmen­t, but also implement a new round of high-level opening-up, push forward the constructi­on of its Belt and Road Initiative, and build a new pattern of opening-up cooperatio­n. China should gain the advantage in developmen­t and earnestly safeguard its national and economic security to ensure that the goal of moderately prosperous society will be achieved in a timely manner.

 ??  ?? US Interest Rates: To Raise or Not to Raise? The divergence of major economies in policy is likely to hamper global economic stability.
US Interest Rates: To Raise or Not to Raise? The divergence of major economies in policy is likely to hamper global economic stability.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China