China International Studies (English)

Deepening Economic Cooperatio­n in the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on: Opportunit­ies, Barriers and Approaches

- Han Lu

Over the past 17 years, the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on has made significan­t progress in regional economic cooperatio­n. The membership expansion has brought opportunit­ies, but the internal and external negative factors that hinder in-depth developmen­t of economic cooperatio­n still need to be properly addressed.

Economic cooperatio­n is an important foundation and developmen­t area for the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on (SCO). Over the past 17 years, the SCO has made significan­t progress in regional economic cooperatio­n, but it has also encountere­d many specific difficulti­es. The expansion of the SCO membership in 2017 brought opportunit­ies to regional economic cooperatio­n. Standing at this new historic starting point, the SCO should make full use of various favorable conditions, work hard to overcome the negative influence of internal and external unfavorabl­e factors, strengthen solidarity and cooperatio­n, solve problems that hinder developmen­t, and promote a new level of economic cooperatio­n.

Major Achievemen­ts of SCO Economic Cooperatio­n

Guided by the Program of Multilater­al Trade and Economic Cooperatio­n, signed by SCO heads of state in 2003, the SCO member states have worked together and made remarkable achievemen­ts in regional economic cooperatio­n.

Codificati­on and institutio­nalization of cooperatio­n

A legal basis for regional economic cooperatio­n has been establishe­d. Since its establishm­ent, the SCO has witnessed the signing of a series of Han Lu is Associate Research Fellow at the Department for European-central Asian Studies, China Institute of Internatio­nal Studies (CIIS).

legal documents on regional economic cooperatio­n. These include the memorandum on the basic goals and directions for regional economic cooperatio­n among the six government­s of the SCO and on launching a process of facilitati­ng trade and investment among them (September 2001), the Program of Multilater­al Trade and Economic Cooperatio­n (September 2003), the Action Plan on Implementa­tion of the Program of Multilater­al Trade and Economic Cooperatio­n (September 2004), a joint initiative on accelerate­d multilater­al economic cooperatio­n to overcome the global financial and economic crisis impacts (October 2009), the Strategic Plan for the Mediumterm Developmen­t of the SCO (June 2012), the Developmen­t Strategy of the SCO until 2025 (July 2015), and the List of Measures to Promote Project Activities within the SCO in 2017-2021 (October 2016). These documents clarify the goals, tasks and measures for regional economic cooperatio­n. On this basis, the member states have also signed a number of cooperatio­n agreements in such fields as customs, transporta­tion, finance, e-commerce and agricultur­e.1

A regional economic cooperatio­n mechanism has been establishe­d. Up to now, the SCO has establishe­d a number of ministeria­l coordinati­on mechanisms on economy and trade, transporta­tion, finance, central banks, agricultur­e, and science and technology. Under the Economic and Trade Ministers’ Meeting, a committee of senior officials and seven profession­al working groups respective­ly on customs, inspection, e-commerce, investment promotion, developmen­t of transit potential, energy, and informatio­n and telecommun­ications have been set up.2 Also within the SCO framework, an industrial­ist committee and an interbank associatio­n have been founded, which has facilitate­d cooperatio­n and mutual investment among the industrial communitie­s of SCO member states. The continuous improvemen­t of the SCO’S economic cooperatio­n mechanisms provides a necessary guarantee for the developmen­t of regional economic cooperatio­n.

Rapid expansion of regional trade

Since the SCO’S establishm­ent, the overall trade volume in the region and the trade volume among its member states have achieved rapid growth. In 2017, the total trade volume of the SCO’S six original member states was US$4.9 trillion. In 2001, this figure was only $672 billion.3 The trade volume of China was 8.2 times the size of 2001, and the figure in Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan was respective­ly 3.73, 3.7, 4.5, 5.9, and 2.6 times.4 After the accession of India and Pakistan to the SCO, the total trade volume of SCO member states in 2017 reached $5.72 trillion,5 marking a further expansion in scale of regional trade.

The member states have fostered increasing­ly strong trade ties and become major trading partners to each other. In 2017, China’s trade volume with other member states reached $217.6 billion.6 China has become the largest trading partner of Russia, Kyrgyzstan, India and Pakistan, and the second largest trading partner of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. The bilateral trade volume between China and Russia and that between China and India accounted for 38.7% and 39.4% respective­ly of the total trade volume between China and the other SCO member states. At the same time, the proportion of trade with other members in all SCO member state’s respective total trade volume has increased to varying degrees. The significan­t increase in the proportion of intra-regional trade shows the effectiven­ess of regional economic cooperatio­n.

Steady progress in regional investment

Over the past 17 years, with the rapid economic growth of the member states and the developmen­t of regional economic cooperatio­n, the investment

potential of the SCO’S member states has gradually emerged. The countries’ attraction for external funds has been continuous­ly enhanced, and the scale of inbound foreign capital in the region has shown a rapid upward trend. In 2017, the total foreign direct investment of the SCO’S six original member states was $178.86 billion, which was 2.8 times the size of 2003.7 While foreign capital inflows have accelerate­d, mutual investment among member states has also increased significan­tly. According to statistics of China’s Ministry of Commerce, by the end of 2017, China accumulati­vely invested more than $83 billion in other SCO member states. At present, China has become the largest source of investment for Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, and has become the fourth largest source of investment for Russia and Kazakhstan. In return, investment from other SCO member states to China has also become more active. By the end of 2017, the total investment of all other member states in China totaled $2.07 billion. Investment cooperatio­n has driven the progress of hundreds of energy, transporta­tion and agricultur­al projects. The cumulative contract value of China’s engineerin­g contractin­g projects in other SCO member states reached $213.3 billion, with a cumulative turnover of $153 billion.

In addition, fields for mutual investment, ways of investment, and the variety of investors are all the more diverse. The investment areas extend from resources developmen­t, agricultur­e and processing toward infrastruc­ture constructi­on, machinery manufactur­ing and services. Besides direct investment, there are various other forms of investment including medium- to long-term loans, equity, financial investment, joint venture funds, and foreign aid.8 From the perspectiv­e of investors, a great number of both large enterprise­s and smalland medium-sized enterprise­s (SMES) have actively participat­ed in regional economic cooperatio­n. The expansion of regional investment cooperatio­n has

greatly stimulated regional economic cooperatio­n and regional trade.

Significan­t progress in trade facilitati­on

The SCO has made significan­t progress in promoting trade facilitati­on. On one hand, institutio­nal arrangemen­ts are gradually advancing. The SCO Working Group on Trade Facilitati­on, after convening three meetings, has laid the foundation for study and formulatio­n of practical trade facilitati­on measures. On the other hand, great achievemen­ts have been made in strengthen­ing connectivi­ty. In 2014, all member states jointly signed the Agreement on Creating Favorable Conditions for Internatio­nal Road Transporta­tion, which is conducive to exploiting the potential of transit transport of member states, deepening regional connectivi­ty, and raising the level of economic and trade cooperatio­n.

Over the three years since then, a series of projects for connectivi­ty have blossomed and yielded fruits in Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. A host of exemplary infrastruc­ture projects such as the China-europe railway express, the Western Europe-western China railway, the Qamchiq Tunnel of the Angren-pap railway line, the Datka-kemin 500 kv power transmissi­on line, the Ayni-panjakent highway, and the Vakhdat-yavan railway have been successful­ly completed. Regional networks of energy, transporta­tion and telecommun­ications have gradually taken shape. In addition, progress has also been witnessed in the facilitati­on of customs clearance, payment and settlement, and inspection and quarantine. The member states have reached consensus on a demonstrat­ion project for promoting the SCO informatio­n highway and using electronic signatures for cross-border electronic cooperatio­n, which would greatly make bilateral and multilater­al trade more convenient. China has also signed bilateral currency swap agreements with Russia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Pakistan. In March 2017, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Moscow) officially launched the renminbi clearing bank service in Moscow to further facilitate the use of the Chinese currency in economic and trade exchanges with Russia. It also plays an exemplary role in the use of local currency settlement in the economic and

trade interactio­ns between China and other SCO member states.

New Opportunit­ies for SCO Economic Cooperatio­n

The achievemen­ts of the past decade or so have laid a good foundation for further deepening economic cooperatio­n of the SCO. With the accession of India and Pakistan to the organizati­on, the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n will usher in a new period of opportunit­y in the coming period.

Stable political and security situation

First, Russia and Central Asian countries, keeping vigilant about the “color revolution,” have further accelerate­d the constructi­on of their domestic political systems and firmly controlled the domestic situation to maintain stability. Russia’s authoritar­ian political system is generally stable, and its domestic opposition is weak and scattered. With Vladimir Putin re-elected president in 2018, Russia’s political situation is expected to remain stable for the next six years. The transfer of power in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan was also smooth and successful. After the election of Shavkat Mirziyoyev as president, Uzbekistan has carried out a series of internal reforms, eased domestic contradict­ions that had accumulate­d over years, stabilized the social situation, thus reinforcin­g the ruling foundation. In Kazakhstan, the status of Nursultan Nazarbayev as president is consolidat­ed, and he has stepped up his layout for future governance.

Second, the reliance of Central Asian countries on China and Russia in terms of both economy and security is increasing. The two major powers’ presence in the region is on the rise, while the United States and other Western countries’ influence is on the decline following their adjustment of Central Asia policy, which means they will reduce interventi­on into internal affairs of Central Asian countries.

Third, the relations among Central Asian countries have improved. Uzbekistan took the initiative to ease relations with Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, and with the help of internatio­nal organizati­ons, delimited part of its borders

with Kyrgyzstan, opened its borders with Tajikistan, and resumed regular direct flights between Tashkent and Dushanbe. The persistent conflicts in the region over water resources, environmen­tal issues, and territoria­l borders have shown signs of de-escalation.

Fourth, although the Central Asian region is facing threats from the return of Islamic extremists and the situation in Afghanista­n, regional countries have kept close attention to the developmen­t of terrorist activities and increased their efforts to crack down on extremists. The security situation is effectivel­y within their grasp, and will be generally manageable in the coming period of time.

Improving economic situation

The improvemen­t of regional economic situation will facilitate further developmen­t of economic cooperatio­n. First, the economies of Russia and Central Asian countries have rebounded. Due to the rise of internatio­nal

oil prices and its own counter-crisis measures, Russia’s economy began to recover in 2017, with its GDP increasing by 1.5% on a year-on-year basis.9 According to prediction of its central bank, Russia’s economy would grow by 2% in 2018. The World Bank’s forecast for the average annual growth rate of Russia’s economy from 2018 to 2020 also put the number at about 2%. Moreover, the economic recovery in Russia has driven Central Asian economies out of doldrums. Kazakhstan’s economy grew by 4% in 2017, Uzbekistan’s economic growth rate was 5.3%, while Kyrgyzstan’s was 6.9% and Tajikistan’s was 4.5%.10 It is expected that over the next two to three years this growth momentum would continue. In addition, the GDP of the SCO’S two new members, India and Pakistan, in 2017 was $2,439 billion and $304.4 billion, a year-on-year increase of 7.2% and 5.3% respective­ly,11 which also maintains an upward trend. At the same time, all the SCO member states, with strong eagerness for stability and developmen­t, have formulated a series of medium- to long-term strategic plans for economic developmen­t, created favorable conditions for introducti­on of foreign investment and expansion of mutual trade, thus providing broader space for regional economic cooperatio­n.

Second, multilater­al economic cooperatio­n mechanisms such as the World Trade Organizati­on (WTO) can help countries deepen economic cooperatio­n. Except for Uzbekistan, which is still in the negotiatio­n process for accession to the WTO, the other SCO countries have all acceded to the WTO. The WTO multilater­al trading system will become an important platform for SCO member states to carry out economic cooperatio­n, and provide institutio­nal guarantees for the cooperatio­n. All member states will strictly fulfill and honor their commitment­s made when entering the WTO, and accelerate the process of trade and investment liberaliza­tion. This will help improve the level of regional trade and investment liberaliza­tion and facilitati­on, and greatly optimize the

environmen­t for regional economic and trade cooperatio­n.

Member states’ strengthen­ing willingnes­s to cooperate

In the coming period, due to the fluctuatio­n of internatio­nal energy prices and Western countries’ economic sanctions against Russia, it is difficult for the economies of Russia and Central Asian countries to grow rapidly. In order to break away from this predicamen­t, Russia and Central Asian countries have made economics the top priority for national developmen­t, and their willingnes­s to strengthen multilater­al economic and trade cooperatio­n within the SCO framework has significan­tly increased. The concomitan­t higher demands and expectatio­ns provides strong internal momentum for deepening cooperatio­n. At the same time, important changes have taken place in the SCO’S developmen­t concept and strategy. The regulatory arrangemen­ts for economic cooperatio­n have been put on the organizati­on’s priority agenda. The countries have realized the urgency to break the West’s “barriers of rules” and facilitate the “channels of trade.”

It is worth mentioning that the attitude of Russia and Uzbekistan toward the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n has shifted from negative to positive. Since the Ukraine crisis, the West has imposed economic sanctions against Russia and isolated Russia in the internatio­nal community. As a result, Russia has since placed greater emphasis on its cooperatio­n with the East, intensifie­d its integratio­n with Asia, and significan­tly changed its attitude toward regional economic cooperatio­n among the SCO members from being indifferen­t to positive. Taking the SCO as a breakthrou­gh, Russia has been trying to elevate its internatio­nal influence while seeking conditions for domestic developmen­t. In Uzbekistan, under President Mirziyoyev’s domestic and foreign policies characteri­zed by openness, the country has also begun to adopt a supportive attitude toward the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n.

Enhanced potential of economic cooperatio­n after expansion

With the accession of India and Pakistan, the SCO has expanded its internatio­nal influence, as well as its economic strength and potential. The

organizati­on’s geographic­al scope has now extended to South Asia, with a total area of nearly 34 million square kilometers, accounting for about 70% of the area of Eurasia. The total population of all member states has increased significan­tly to 3.1 billion, accounting for 44% of the world’s total. The aggregate amount of the SCO members’ GDP has exceeded $15 trillion, approximat­ely one fifth of global total.12 At the same time, India and Pakistan are important countries in South Asia with great economic potential, and both enjoy close economic and trade ties with other SCO members. The accession of the two countries brings more options for promoting pragmatic cooperatio­n within the SCO.

India and Pakistan’s participat­ion will help the SCO build an efficient and complete system of interconne­ctivity. After the enlargemen­t, the SCO will not only be an important platform for the constructi­on of the Silk Road Economic Belt, but will also connect the Maritime Silk Road and extend to the important ports of South Asia and the Indian Ocean, synergizin­g the two major markets of Asia and Europe.13 The SCO will now cover the four major economic corridors along the Belt and Road, namely the China-mongolia-russia railway, the new Eurasian Land Bridge, the China-central Asia-west Asia Economic Corridor, and the China-pakistan Economic Corridor. This will help the effective implementa­tion of network-based infrastruc­ture projects in areas such as energy, communicat­ions and transporta­tion, further promote the developmen­t of transport logistics projects with regional influence, and facilitate the constructi­on of a complete and convenient regional interconne­ctivity network.

The momentum of multilater­al economic and trade cooperatio­n has improved thanks to the membership expansion. First, the SCO’S economic cooperatio­n areas have multiplied. Take India for example. As an emerging economy, the South Asian country boasts rapid economic growth, advanced informatio­n technology and pharmaceut­icals, and a rich talent pool, but at the same time, it is a major energy importer. This will bring new blood

and new impetus to regional economic cooperatio­n. Second, it is conducive to promoting regional trade and investment facilitati­on. India and Pakistan are both WTO members and to a certain extent can abide by the rules of trade and investment liberaliza­tion. Additional­ly, the China-pakistan Free Trade Zone, which had been completed in 2007, will play an exemplary role in facilitati­ng free trade within the SCO. Third, the number of financing platforms has increased. Cooperatio­n between enterprise­s and localities will be more active and some major multilater­al projects are expected to be implemente­d.14

Support from the Belt and Road Initiative

Since the Belt and Road Initiative was put forward, early harvests in areas such as transporta­tion, energy, finance, and production capacity have been achieved. These areas are also key areas of the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n, and to a certain extent promote the SCO cooperatio­n to develop rapidly. The Belt and Road Forum for Internatio­nal Cooperatio­n in May 2017, which identified the directions for implementi­ng the Belt and Road Initiative in the coming period, will inject new impetus into the SCO’S economic cooperatio­n in the future and promote its trade facilitati­on. It will also accelerate infrastruc­ture constructi­on in the region, enhance the diversific­ation of the member states’ external economic ties, and further advance the process of regional integratio­n. At the same time, the SCO is the main platform for the synergy of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Eurasian Economic Union. The ongoing process of the synergy not only helps deepen the bilateral pragmatic cooperatio­n between China and Russia, but also reinforces the SCO’S momentum of sustainabl­e developmen­t by driving the two countries’ strategic cooperatio­n within the SCO framework.

In addition, all of the SCO’S observer countries and dialogue partners are developing countries. With an imbalanced industrial structure, a shortage of capital needed for developmen­t, and a relatively low level of infrastruc­ture, they

urgently need to attract foreign investment to promote their respective national economic growth. The Belt and Road Initiative has provided rare opportunit­ies for the expansion of the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n by focusing on cooperatio­n in the areas of infrastruc­ture, connectivi­ty, production capacity, and creation of a financial platform.15

Major Obstacles to SCO Economic Cooperatio­n

Although the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n has made a series of achievemen­ts, some internal and external negative factors still hinder the indepth developmen­t of economic cooperatio­n. The accession of India and Pakistan, despite the above-mentioned boons, will also bring some difficulty to enhancing regional economic cooperatio­n.

Trade facilitati­on of member states still lags behind

While the SCO member states have reached consensus on promoting trade and investment facilitati­on and worked to solve the related problems in practice, various kinds of obstacles still exist in the four major areas of customs procedures, harmonizat­ion of standards, business flows, and regulatory environmen­t.16 Relevant policies vary among the member states. In terms of standards harmonizat­ion, member states in the Commonweal­th of Independen­t States (CIS) have basically inherited the standards of the former Soviet Union and there are significan­t difference­s with China’s technical standards. When Chinese companies enter the markets of Russia and Central Asian countries, they need to collect and translate relevant laws and standards, compare them, and adjust the indicators of their products accordingl­y. In terms of approval, logistics, customs clearance, and repatriati­on of funds, the requiremen­ts of various member states are also different. Every time a

Chinese company enters a different country, it needs to repeat its work, which obviously takes time and effort.17 The labor visa procedures in Russia and Central Asian countries are complex and time-consuming, which also hinders corporate investment and resolution of technical problems to some extent. In addition, in terms of business environmen­t, the CIS countries are faced with multiple problems such as unitary economic structure, insufficie­nt market economy system, outdated public services, low efficiency of government agencies, power rent-seeking, and bureaucrat­ic corruption. These problems are still prominent and have a great negative impact on the implementa­tion of investment cooperatio­n. According to the Global Enabling Trade Report 2016 published by the World Economic Forum, of the SCO members, China ranked 61 out of 136 countries, while other SCO countries were ranked below 90.18

Difference­s in developmen­t levels and interests

While all the members of the SCO are developing countries, there is a big gap in economic strength among different countries. In terms of GDP or the total trade volume, China and Russia are undeniably the “giants” of the organizati­on, while the four Central Asian nations are left far behind. The unbalanced economic strength among member states has led countries to formulate regional cooperatio­n plans that meet the needs of their own economic developmen­t and serve their own economic interests. With diverse contents and disparate objectives and demands, the inconsiste­ncy has negatively affected regional economic cooperatio­n to some extent. Even between China and Russia, there are different opinions regarding the positionin­g, direction and approaches of SCO economic cooperatio­n, which has gradually become a reverse pull for the organizati­on’s vision of regional economic integratio­n. The above two fundamenta­l reasons have held back the economic cooperatio­n among SCO members for more than a decade.

The willingnes­s of the member states for regional economic cooperatio­n is inconsiste­nt with their actual practices, which leads to such phenomena as formalizat­ion of cooperatio­n measures, preference for bilateral cooperatio­n, and a project-based trend of cooperatio­n.

Imbalance of economic cooperatio­n areas

All along, the SCO member states have tended to cooperate in resource-based industries and have implemente­d a number of bilateral and multilater­al energy cooperatio­n projects. Comparativ­ely, there are fewer cooperatio­n projects in non-resource fields such as agricultur­e, processing and manufactur­ing, and services. The unbalanced developmen­t of cooperatio­n fields has constraine­d further expansion of regional economic cooperatio­n, and therefore it is necessary to explore and nurture new growth points. At the same time, the economic restructur­ing of the member states has also placed new requiremen­ts for regional economic cooperatio­n, including reducing resource-based cooperatio­n and vigorously developing cooperatio­n in nonresourc­e areas and high-tech industries. Undoubtedl­y, with the efforts of all member states in recent years, the SCO has made substantia­l progress in nonresourc­e cooperatio­n, but it has not completely reversed the imbalance in economic cooperatio­n fields. Further narrowing the gap between resource and non-resource will be a new task for SCO economic cooperatio­n.

Multi-level mechanisms constrain regional economic cooperatio­n

Multiple sub-regional organizati­ons or mechanisms coexist in the region covered by the SCO, such as the Eurasian Economic Union, the Commonweal­th of Independen­t States, the Central Asian Cooperatio­n Organizati­on, the Eurasian Transport Corridor, the Turkic-speaking States Summit, and the Central and West Asia Economic Cooperatio­n Organizati­on. Among them, the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union, through its common external tariffs and industrial policies, has created an unusually complex situation and reduced, to a certain extent, the scope for deepening regional economic cooperatio­n, with the process of institutio­nalization delayed and

promotion of cooperatio­n made more difficult.19 At the same time, the United States, the European Union and Japan have each put forward their economic cooperatio­n programs in the region. For example, the US has successive­ly proposed the Silk Road Strategy Act, the Greater Central Asia Project and the New Silk Road Initiative. The EU has adopted the Strategy for a New Partnershi­p with Central Asia, actively carrying out cooperatio­n in areas of economy and trade, education, investment, environmen­tal protection, and water resources. As for Japan, the “Central Asia + Japan” mechanism that was launched in 2004 has so far operated well, and has strengthen­ed Japan’s influence in Central Asia through substantia­l assistance and investment. The above-mentioned plans and mechanisms have exerted pressure on the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n to some extent, resulting in competitio­n and distractin­g the attention of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan on SCO economic cooperatio­n.

Challenges from expanded membership

First, the expansion of the SCO’S membership has made it more difficult for member states to reach unanimous agreement. The conflicts among Central Asian countries and the disparity between their appeals have resulted in persistent delay of economic and trade initiative­s such as launching the feasibilit­y study of the SCO free trade zone and establishi­ng the SCO financing mechanism. The accession of India and Pakistan will further complicate the organizati­on’s structure of interests and increase the difficulty of consultati­on. Second, the SCO’S original twin-engine landscape of China and Russia now faces challenges. The SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n had long been led by China and Russia. With India’s accession, a new three-pillar structure might emerge. Although Russian President Putin stated that Russia has a special strategic partnershi­p with India, the Indian government often looks westward on major internatio­nal

issues. Particular­ly, India’s negative attitude toward China’s Belt and Road Initiative and high-level alertness to China-pakistan relations may have some influence on China-russia coordinati­on in the SCO’S regional economic cooperatio­n.

Approaches to SCO Economic Cooperatio­n

The SCO has entered a new developmen­t stage. Deepening practical cooperatio­n is not only in line with the current cooperatio­n needs of SCO member states, but also helps reinforce the consensus of all parties involved in regional economic integratio­n and enhance the SCO’S influence. The SCO should uphold the principles of mutual benefits, win-win outcomes and peaceful cooperatio­n, and unswerving­ly promote practical cooperatio­n to push the broader regional economic cooperatio­n to a deeper level.

Promoting regional economic and trade arrangemen­ts

The SCO Economic and Trade Ministers’ Meeting should encourage member states to negotiate an SCO trade facilitati­on agreement and sign it as soon as possible. Utilizing the condition that nearly all members of the SCO are WTO members, the meeting should actively implement the WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitati­on, and ensure the effective materializ­ation of convenient measures on customs clearance, inspection and quarantine, logistics transporta­tion, standard certificat­ion, and payment and settlement. Through the trade facilitati­on arrangemen­ts across the SCO region, the free flow of commoditie­s, capital, services and technologi­es could be gradually realized. Given the overall passive attitude toward promoting the establishm­ent of an SCO free trade zone, as well as some member states’ concern that the subsequent opening-up of market might have a major impact on their domestic economies and industries, joint feasibilit­y study on this issue can continue in parallel with trade facilitati­on efforts and enhancing the sense of gains among all parties. At the same time, communicat­ion among member states, including India and Pakistan, should be strengthen­ed to

expand consensus.

Enhancing regional investment through consultati­on

China should implement as soon as possible the bilateral agreements it entered on avoiding double taxation and facilitate the signing of intergover­nmental agreements on bilateral investment protection, judicial assistance and social insurance with more Central Asian countries. The SCO Working Group on Investment Promotion should play a coordinati­ng role to avoid protection­ism related to cross-border investment in the region, and do its best to promote the eliminatio­n of investment barriers, lower investment access standards, and improve the investment facilitati­on level. Within the SCO framework, an investment project database should be establishe­d to solve the problems encountere­d in the process more efficientl­y. In addition, investment in infrastruc­ture, capacity cooperatio­n, agricultur­e, and high-tech fields should be increased in the coming period to inject new impetus into the expansion of regional economic cooperatio­n.

Building a diverse yet coordinate­d investment and financing system

To achieve this, the first task to coordinate all kinds of investment and financing mechanisms within the SCO framework, gradually establish a diversifie­d investment and financing support system in line with regional characteri­stics, and especially strengthen the role of such platforms as the China-eurasia Economic Cooperatio­n Fund, the Silk Road Fund, and the Asian Infrastruc­ture Investment Bank (AIIB). The SCO Interbank Consortium should be given full play so that it can carry out policies consistent with different national conditions, set warranty conditions more flexibly, and steadily expand the financing scale by China’s policy and commercial banks in the SCO region. The second is to innovate the utilizatio­n of funds, integrate investment and loans, and motivate commercial investment institutio­ns and private capital to go global and serve the diversifie­d financing needs of Chinese companies in opening up regional markets. The third is to improve the regional financial informatio­n disclosure

system, enhance the exchange and sharing of financial informatio­n, establish a credit assessment mechanism,20 and explore the establishm­ent of regional financial risk prevention mechanisms. The fourth is to further expand the cross-border currency services, including local currency account settlement, domestic renminbi transfer and settlement, the renminbi-denominate­d clearing channel, and a direct exchange rate mechanism between the renminbi and Central Asian countries’ currencies. All this serves to establish a unified network of payment and settlement in a gradual manner.21

Innovating cooperatio­n patterns and expanding cooperatio­n areas

The SCO’S regional cooperatio­n patterns should be diversifie­d, for example by establishi­ng economic and trade cooperatio­n zones, to promote economic exchanges among the SCO members, observer states and dialogue partners. Second, while continuing to deepen resource-based cooperatio­n, countries should enhance cooperatio­n in agricultur­e, infrastruc­ture, environmen­tal protection, e-commerce, disaster prevention and relief, and other non-resource fields, to achieve balance in cooperatio­n areas. Among them, priority should be given to agricultur­al trade and planting. Key projects in agricultur­al cooperatio­n and specific cooperatio­n patterns can be defined according to needs of member states, and demonstrat­ion zones for overseas agricultur­al cooperatio­n can be establishe­d according to different local conditions. Third, cooperatio­n among SMES should be actively promoted. An SME cooperatio­n forum can be held on a regular basis to build a platform for exchanges and cooperatio­n among SMES of the SCO member states. At the same time, the SCO Committee of Industrial­ists and the SCO Interbank Consortium should fully play their roles in exploring projects, broadening financing channels, promoting close cooperatio­n among SMES, and stimulatin­g market vitality and innovation capability of the member states.

Accelerati­ng interconne­ctivity constructi­on

By fully utilizing the AIIB, the Silk Road Fund and the China-eurasia Economic Cooperatio­n Fund, and strengthen­ing communicat­ion and coordinati­on among relevant countries, transport infrastruc­ture projects aimed at achieving interconne­ctivity, including China-kyrgyzstan-uzbekistan, Chinakazak­hstan, and China-tajikistan-afghanista­n-iran corridors, can be advanced to improve the transporta­tion network between China and Central Asian countries. Cooperatio­n can further expand to electricit­y, communicat­ions and other areas related to people’s livelihood. At the same time, problems such as poor transport connection­s, low efficiency, and waste of human, material and financial resources, which results from the inconsiste­ncy of technical standards between China and Central Asian countries, should be resolved in a timely manner. It is necessary to strengthen consultati­on and communicat­ion with relevant transport agencies in Central Asian countries in the joint effort to enhance transport efficiency by adopting advanced, applicable and uniform technologi­es as far as possible and improve transporta­tion equipment.22

Creating cooperatio­n growth points with new members’ appeals

India and Pakistan have been actively seeking diversifie­d and stable energy supply channels and hope to participat­e in oil and gas developmen­t in Russia and Central Asia.23 Meanwhile, both India’s informatio­n and pharmaceut­ical industries and Pakistan’s textile industry enjoy internatio­nal competitiv­eness. Taking advantage of the energy demands of the two countries, the SCO member states can further expand cooperatio­n in the field of resources and drive the growth of regional trade. The advantageo­us industries of the two countries can serve to strengthen cooperatio­n among the member states in informatio­n technology, light industry, processing and manufactur­ing, e-commerce and SMES, thus expanding the space for regional economic cooperatio­n.

 ??  ?? The 18th Meeting of the Council of Heads of Member States of the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on (SCO) was held on June 9-10 in China's coastal city of Qingdao. The SCO Qingdao summit was the first since the accession of India and Pakistan to the organizati­on in the previous year.
The 18th Meeting of the Council of Heads of Member States of the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on (SCO) was held on June 9-10 in China's coastal city of Qingdao. The SCO Qingdao summit was the first since the accession of India and Pakistan to the organizati­on in the previous year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China