Global Times

New Philippine president misinterpr­ets South China Sea arbitratio­n

- By Liu Chang The author is a writer with the Xinhua News Agency. The article first appeared on Xinhua. opinion@ globaltime­s. com. cn

In his first state of the nation address on Monday, newly- inaugurate­d Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte made the wrong political judgment over the South China Sea issue by eulogizing the recent illegal and invalid arbitral award against China.

In the address, Duterte hailed the recent South China Sea arbitral award given by the unlawfully establishe­d temporary tribunal “a key contributi­on” to peaceful resolution to maritime disputes between the Philippine­s and China.

The arbitratio­n, a unilateral move launched by Duterte’s predecesso­r and steadily rejected by China, has become an illegally establishe­d barrier which Manila itself needs to overcome in order to start talks with Beijing to end their island spats. Bilateral talks are the only way forward in order for the dispute to be resolved, as has been China’s clear position from the start.

It also runs against China’s constant practice of using the mechanism of bilateral talks among the concerned parties in the region to handle such matters.

Second, the arbitral award, which unjustly downgraded the islands’ status to mere “rocks” around which economic exclusive zones cannot be claimed under the law, has seriously undermined China’s sovereign rights in the South China Sea. Thus it would be naive for anyone to fancy that China will somehow nod to the propositio­n of basing future talks with the Philippine­s on the illegal and invalid arbitral award.

Third, the one- sided award could embolden other regional nations to follow suit, which would further fuel the tensions in the region and allow outside meddlers the chance to further interfere. The award was nothing but a farce and can never be the basis of further deliberati­on.

Also in the speech, Duterte was mistaken about the connection­s between the arbitral award and the Permanent Court of Arbitratio­n ( PCA). He said the outcome of the case was made before the PCA.

In fact, the arbitral award was made by a temporary tribunal, not the court. Meanwhile, according to internatio­nal law, the tribunal also has no jurisdicti­on over sovereigni­ty issues.

Of course, it is noted that the new Philippine head of state has expressed many times his intention to work with China to figure out their difference­s, and has nominated former Philippine President Fidel Ramos as a special envoy to China.

Thus, if the Philippine­s truly wants peace, then, it should come back to the right track. That starts with recognizin­g the harm the arbitratio­n has already inflicted on bilateral ties and regional tranquilit­y and apologizin­g to China for the damage inflicted on the relationsh­ip. Only when the Philippine­s takes a humble attitude can peace be guaranteed in the region.

 ?? Page Editor: sunxiaobo@ globaltime­s. com. cn ??
Page Editor: sunxiaobo@ globaltime­s. com. cn

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China