Global Times

Sino- US think tank dialogue helps chart a smooth path for bilateral relations

- By Wei Jianguo The author is executive deputy director of China Center for Internatio­nal Economic Exchanges. opinion@ globaltime­s. com. cn

The High- level Dialogue on US- China Economic Relations was convened on Wednesday in New York with over 30 scholars from leading think tanks in the two countries. The one- day event is the first of its kind since a landmark meeting in early April between Chinese President Xi Jinping and his US counterpar­t Donald Trump in Mar- aLago, Florida. I have attended numerous dialogues, but this one left a lasting impression on me.

The successful dialogue changed the way of previous China- US think tank dialogues as follows:

First, the participan­ts are high- ranking and influentia­l. Many high- caliber scholars and experts from top- notch think tanks in China and the US attended the dialogue, apart from prominent attendees such as Tung Chee- hwa, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultati­ve Conference, Zhao Qizheng, former minister of China’s State Council Informatio­n Office, Kevin Rudd, president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, Michael Bloomberg, former New York City mayor and former US ambassador to China J. Stapleton Roy.

Second, the dialogue fell at an opportune time, two months after the Mar- a- Lago presidenti­al meeting and one month after the Belt and Road Forum for Internatio­nal Cooperatio­n, and before Trump’s official visit to China later this year.

Third, the dialogue discussed hot- button topics and focused on the industrial and commercial sectors in both countries. For example, what is the future of Beijing- Washington business ties? Will cooperatio­n or competitio­n become the general trend in the bilateral economic and trade relations? Will a trade war break out between China and the US? How to expand trade cooperatio­n in areas beyond US beef exports to China? Will an annual plan come after the 100- Day Plan which was reached between the two countries to improve trade ties? As for the Belt and Road ( B& R) initiative, how much investment is involved in the B& R, who are the investors, will the return cover the investment and what are the major geopolitic­al factors that affect the initiative?

Both sides in previous dialogues often criticized each other and asked for mutual understand­ing. But this time, the two delegation­s calmed themselves down to address common problems.

In addition, closed- door dialogues prevailed in the past. However, in a change from previous dialogues, ahead of the talks Chinese participan­ts visited Iowa, saw the flourishin­g crops of soybean and corn, and communicat­ed with local farmers.

A young American farmer said that a trade war is not expected and stable China- US ties will ensure more American agricultur­al products go to China. This indicates economic and trade cooperatio­n acts as the “ballast stone” and “propeller” for the developmen­t of bilateral relations.

A year ago, entreprene­urs, media outlets and business elites in China and the US were struggling through a sea of anxiety and bewilderme­nt. But this year witnessed bilateral economic and trade relations moving toward a more stable direction.

Seeking to remedy this instabilit­y is the most important work for think tanks. Both sides begin to take the other into account as they strive for solutions. In the future, the think tanks will play an increasing­ly important role in bilateral relations.

The initial achievemen­ts of the 100- Day Plan have bolstered Sino- US business ties. American beef will return to the Chinese market after 14 years. Chinese entreprene­urs now hope to import more US high technologi­es. So far as we know, the US is also conducting relevant research in this regard and a trade war between China and the US is not likely to happen.

But think tanks from both sides should better communicat­e and work together to provide sound policy advice for both government­s. The US delegation expressed its concerns about the large- scale B& R initiative, but Chinese participan­ts refuted the baseless perception of the initiative as a modern- day version of the Marshall Plan. The dialogue serves as a new starting point for further communicat­ions of think tanks in China and the US. As former acting deputy US Trade Representa­tive Wendy Cutler said, the dialogue, rather than shaping the world, will surprise the globe.

 ?? Illustrati­on: Liu Rui/ GT ??
Illustrati­on: Liu Rui/ GT

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China