Global Times

China, US can jointly shape intl order

- By Zhao Suisheng The author is director of the Center for China- US Cooperatio­n, Josef Korbel School of Internatio­nal Studies, University of Denver. This article is an abstract of his recent speech delivered in Center For China And Globalizat­ion. opinion@

“Internatio­nal order” means the rules, or in other words, universal values, concepts and mechanisms, in global governance. It is shaped by major powers and followed by smaller countries. Rising powers are always attempting to break these rules and re- establish a new order that reflects their values.

The current internatio­nal order was establishe­d by the US after WWII. Many believe that the order is now challenged by China, a rising power, and also by the US itself, as practices by US President Donald Trump are challengin­g and even destroying the current order.

The US is indeed confounded by some problems, and China is dissatisfi­ed with the current order and is actively participat­ing in internatio­nal governance.

But Beijing will not replace Washington. This is determined by the nature of current internatio­nal order.

At the beginning of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the country was excluded from the UN and didn’t participat­e in the establishm­ent of the post-WWII internatio­nal order. Even if Beijing now is regarded as challengin­g the order, it has never deviated from the current system, especially the principle of sovereign equality. For instance, mutual respect for territoria­l integrity and sovereignt­y is at the core of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistenc­e put forward at the Bandung Conference in 1956. China has been gradually contributi­ng to the current internatio­nal order since it joined the UN in 1971.

It has taken Beijing quite a long time to adapt to internatio­nal rules on sovereign security, human rights and other sensitive agendas. While China once maintained silence on security affairs, it is now playing an important role in UN peacekeepi­ng operations, arms control and other fields. China’s increasing power is the fundamenta­l reason for the shift.

But China is still dissatisfi­ed with the current order. The rules represent mainly Western values, and, given political and cultural divergence­s, China regards many of the rules as unjust and unreasonab­le.

Shifts in economic strength have not been reflected by the current order. Under the current order, China has not obtained rights and discourse power that can match its strength and influence. Therefore, Beijing wants changes, but is suppressed by Washington.

China is dissatisfi­ed with US double standards.

While Washington requires other countries to obey the rules, it does not act in accordance to the rules on most occasions, especially when the situation is unfavorabl­e to it. Washington proposes to shape liberal and multilater­al global institutio­ns, but it has estab- lished an alliance system that excludes China.

As a result, Beijing is playing a more active role in internatio­nal affairs, but this is regarded as a challenge to the current order and Washington. For instance, the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on, the Conference on Interactio­n and Confidence- Building Measures in Asia, the Regional Comprehens­ive Economic Partnershi­p and other Chinese initiative­s are believed to be an effort to counter US interests. China also put forward a number of rules about the sea, outer space and the Internet that are different from US.

But Beijing has no intention to target Washington, and the conditions are immature for it to replace Washington in shaping the internatio­nal order.

To begin with, China’s hard power is not strong enough, and China doesn’t have enough resources to provide public goods for the current order. Soft power is also significan­t in global leadership, and more efforts are needed to make Chinese values and the Chinese model win approval from other countries. Meanwhile, China is still a beneficiar­y of the current order. It has to be admitted that the US- led security system has to some extent facilitate­d peace and stability in Asia.

Therefore, even if China is dissatisfi­ed with the current internatio­nal order, it will not replace the US in making new rules in Asia and the whole world. China is not rewriting the rules, but is attempting to have a higher status in rulemaking. Therefore, there is enormous room for Beijing and Washington to negotiate and cooperate.

The US can transfer some power to China so that the two countries can jointly shape the internatio­nal order. In the meantime, China should clarify that it is an upholder of the current order. China is just trying to reform the rights granted to developing countries.

 ?? Illustrati­on: Liu Rui/ GT ??
Illustrati­on: Liu Rui/ GT

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China