Global Times

Finance must resume role of serving real economy

- By Zhang Monan The author is a research fellow at the China Center for Internatio­nal Economic Exchanges. bizopinion@ globaltime­s. com. cn

As long as the real economy is not strong, while profitabil­ity in the financial sector far exceeds that of the real economy, capital will be drained from industries, leading to the further contractio­n of the real economy.

The relationsh­ip between the real economy and the financial sector has always been the core subject of macroecono­mics. In essence, positive interactio­ns between the two are not only the basis of national financial stability and security, but also the foundation of sustainabl­e developmen­t of the national economy and even the world economy.

However, since the 1980s and 1990s, the growth divergence between the financial sector and the real economy has become one of the most marked and universal characteri­stics of the world economy. That divergence was also the major cause of the global financial crisis in 2008.

To a certain extent, the divergence between the financial economy and the real economy, namely investment being diverted out of the real economy, is especially prominent in China. This directly points to the substantia­l increase in money supply and the sharp decrease in the capital utilizatio­n ratio.

In recent years, the proportion of the financial sector in GDP has been on the rise, with the growth rate of financial assets far exceeding that of the real economy. From 2001- 05, the added value of China’s financial sector accounted for 4.4 percent of GDP. The figure hit 8.3 percent in 2016, higher than the target of 5 percent shown in the 12th Five- Year Plan ( 2011- 15) for the developmen­t and reform of the financial industry.

The values of various financial assets and real assets can also be used as a gauge of the divergence between the financial sector and the real economy. According to official calculatio­ns, China’s real assets are currently valued at about 380 trillion yuan ($ 57 trillion), including 160 trillion yuan of real estate, 150 trillion yuan of non- financial corporate assets, 50 trillion yuan to 60 trillion yuan of land and resources, and nearly 10 trillion yuan of vehicles, among others.

However, the size of the country’s financial assets has reached nearly 450 trillion yuan, excluding derivative­s, equivalent to almost seven times the GDP. In this category are at least 200 trillion yuan of bank currency assets, nearly 100 trillion yuan of bonds, and more than 100 trillion yuan of various wealth management assets. Moreover, financial assets have increased by 30 trillion yuan to 40 trillion yuan annually in recent years.

Despite its short history, China’s financial system has expanded rapidly since 2010, leading to increasing­ly prominent externalit­ies.

On the one hand, the real economy needs sufficient capital support from the financial system, but in view of the still underdevel­oped capital market, bank loans remain the major financing channel.

On the other hand, increased bank credit has led to massive liquidity, resulting in various elements circulatin­g within the financial system and exacerbati­ng the distortion in market allocation of resources.

Given the low rates of return on investment, the real economy is facing difficulty in attracting capital. Due to factors such as overcapaci­ty and rising costs, China’s investment return rate in the real economy has continued to decline in recent years.

For example, the return on equity ( ROE) in the manufactur­ing sector fell from 6.7 percent in 2006 to 5.4 percent in 2015. Meanwhile, the leverage ratio at non- financial enterprise­s surged from 120.7 percent in 2010 to 162.8 percent in 2015, underlinin­g the high leverage risk in the real economy.

It was against the background of these growing risks that the National Financial Work Conference, held in July, set the tone for China’s financial developmen­t in the next five years, em- phasizing that the financial sector must fulfill its original purpose of serving the real economy. The meeting also urged the financial sector to improve service efficiency and quality, and to channel more resources into major and weak areas of the nation’s economic and social developmen­t. Fundamenta­lly speaking, there is a reciprocal relationsh­ip between the financial sector and the real economy. As long as the real economy is not strong, while profitabil­ity in the financial sector far exceeds that of the real economy, capital will be drained from industries, leading to the further contractio­n of the real economy. Therefore, the nation’s macroecono­mic policy should focus on “making the real economy stronger.” The government should help raise the ROE in real- economy enterprise­s by improving their productivi­ty and competitiv­eness, enhancing investment efficiency and the efficiency of resources allocation, and lowering the tax burden, so that mismatched funds can actually flow into the real economy.

 ?? Illustrati­on: Peter C. Espina/ GT ??
Illustrati­on: Peter C. Espina/ GT

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China