Global Times

Whistle-blowers should not go public, says WADA

-

Whistle-blowers in sport should not go public with their informatio­n because they would be compromisi­ng their potential protection, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) said Thursday.

WADA is at the heart of the biggest doping scandal in years after three Russian whistleblo­wers went to the media and exposed a massive systematic doping scheme in the country across many sports and involving more than 1,000 athletes.

“We will protect and defend [all whistle-blowers’] interests,” WADA President Craig Reedie said Thursday.

“The problem comes when they themselves go into the public domain. Once that happens it becomes difficult for us to offer good protection. They have now said it publicly.”

Track and field athlete Yulia Stepanova and her husband Vitaly, who went public about doping in Russia back in 2014, has accused WADA of doing nothing after they had tried for years to pass on informatio­n to the anti-doping body.

As a result Russia’s track and field team was banned from the Rio Olympics in 2016 and Russia was banned from the Pyeongchan­g Winter Olympics starting Friday, with the athletes competing as neutrals under the Olympic flag.

Russia’s anti-doping agency remains suspended as is the country’s Olympic committee.

The Stepanovs, as well as the former head of the Russian anti-doping lab Grigory Rodchenkov, have fled to the US for fear of their lives and have gone into hiding after they were branded traitors back home.

All three are now living in undisclose­d locations while Russia has said it plans to ask the US to extradite Rodchenkov.

“It is our philosophy... that whistle-blowers should in the great majority of cases remain anonymous,” said WADA Director-General Olivier Niggli. “They should not be the face of the investigat­ion, precisely to protect them.

“Our goal is to protect the identity of the whistle-blower to the best of our extent.

“When a whistle-blower goes public then it is the choice of the individual and neither WADA nor any organizati­on can protect them. We are not equipped for that and only law enforcemen­t has those capabiliti­es.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China