Stolen goods
Chinese netizens call for return of stolen ancient bronze vessel set for auction in UK
An extremely rare Chinese bronze vessel that was plundered from the Old Summer Palace, or Yuanmingyuan, by a British officer in 1860 during the Second Opium War (1856-60) has been scheduled for sale at the Canterbury Auction Galleries in Kent, a southeast town in the UK on April 11.
The bronze, known as the Tiger Ying, is an ancient wine vessel dating back to the Western Zhou Dynasty (1027-771 BC). According to the auction house, the name Tiger comes from its unique tiger decorations on its lid and spout. With only nine similar vessels known to exist, this treasure has an estimated value of 120,000 to 200,000 pounds ($170,000-284,000).
Spoils of war
The vessel was recently rediscovered by Alastair Gibson, a British art dealer, along with three other bronzes from the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) as well as a photo and a letter that connect the bronzes to the sack of Yuanmingyuan by British and French forces in 1860. In the letter dated October 17, 1860, Harry Lewis Evans (1831-83), a Royal Marine Captain during the Second Opium War, explains to his mother how he took the Tiger Ying vessel from Yuanmingyuan.
“I succeeded in getting several bronzes and enamel vases as well as some very fine porcelain cups and saucers of the Emperor’s imperial pattern but they are so dreadfully brittle that I quite despair ever being able to get them home in their present condition,” Evans wrote.
Talking to media, Gibson stated that he never imagined that he would come across such valuable relics when a friend asked him to look at his small private collection. The dealer emphasized that the Tiger Ying was an unparalleled valuable piece since it depicts a tiger, considered to be the king of beasts in Chinese culture.
The vessel has undergone thermoluminescence tests that show it is between 2,200 and 3,500 years old.
“Although it is said to be looted from Yuanmingyuan, we still have to confirm this,” Ding Meng, an expert on bronzes at the Palace Museum in Beijing, told the Global Times.
“Scientific tests can only determine the age of this treasure. Based only on the pictures that we’ve seen online, it is difficult to say if it actually came from Yuanmingyuan,” Ding said, emphasizing that “if it is really was looted from Yuanmingyuan, according to the current international convention it should be returned to China.”
Call for return
As news of the auction quickly swept through Chinese social media, many netizens posted differing opinions on Sina Weibo.
“It reminds us of a humiliating period of history,” posted netizen Fengshui Master Zhang Xianchen’s Hong Kong Fan.
“Shame on them for selling something that was looted by their ancestors,” commented Dai Ni Zuo Jianzhi.
Some netizens tried to look on the brighter side of the sale, thinking of it as a way to ensure the aging bronze is protected.
“If there will be someone who takes good care of it, then I think the sale is fine,” said Lanjiajia Ershi.
This is not the first time that relics looted from China have been sold at auction. Famous examples like the Administration Scroll, the painting series Forty
Scenes of Yuanmingyuan and the heads of four Chinese zodiac statues that were stolen when the joint British and French army attacked Beijing.
According to historic documents, at least 1.5 million treasures were looted from Yuanmingyuan, with most being scattered overseas.
Although UNESCO has launched a convention to prevent the illicit trafficking of the stolen antiquities and provides several ways to ask for restitution of cultural property, getting these treasures back is no easy task for China.
It is not an impossible one, however, as other countries have seen success in the past.
The return of the Korean Pukkwan Victory Monument, a stone stele commemorating a series of Korean military victories against invading Japanese forces during the Imjin War (1592-98), in 2005 is a good example.
The monument was stolen from the Korean peninsula during the RussoJapanese War in 1905 and then stored at the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo.
There it remained until 2005, when Korean Buddhists asked for its return, a request that put the Japanese government under some pressure.
Finally, through the joint efforts of the ministers of culture in North and South Korea, the monument was returned to its home in Hamgyong Province in North Korea later that year.
The State Administration of Cultural Heritage of China told the Global Times that the administration is still “discussing” its official response to the
sale.