Global Times

G7 expansion more symbolic than substantiv­e

- By Xin Qiang The author is deputy director of the Center for US Studies at Fudan University. opinion@globaltime­s.com.cn

US President Donald Trump on Saturday expressed his intention to delay the annual Group of 7 (G7) summit until September. He had planned to invite Russia, South Korea, Australia and India to join the talks. It is reported Trump also spoke to Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro on Monday about Brazil’s participat­ion in the meeting.

Trump claims the G7 is “very outdated,” failing to reflect the present internatio­nal situation. His comment about this group is not irrational. The seven countries were among the most advanced economies when the group was establishe­d. The G7 played a significan­t role in shaping pivotal decisions about the global economy and politics.

However, the influence of this group today cannot be mentioned in the same breath. With the rise of emerging economies represente­d by China, structural changes have occurred in the global economic landscape. China has become the world’s second largest economy since 2010. And its economic influence is larger than any member of G7, except for the US. Other emerging countries, such as India, Brazil and Russia, have developed into forces to be reckoned with too.

Based on Trump’s prior moves, if he thinks certain organizati­on or pact goes against or cannot satisfy the interests of his administra­tion, he would terminate the US’ relationsh­ip with them. This includes the WHO, the Paris Agreement, and the Iran nuclear deal, etc.

Trump didn’t quit the G7 because a withdrawal will make the US lose support from the six other powerful members, which he needs for his agenda to deter and contain China, especially after China’s successful economic recovery from the pandemic. Therefore, Trump has to maintain US participat­ion in the organizati­on.

However, Trump is aware of the fact that US’ influence and capability in leading the other six members are declining due to his unilateral moves – which have ultimately impaired them.

For example, German Chancellor Angela Merkel last week rebuffed Trump’s invitation to attend a face to face G7 summit proposed for June. According to the New York Times, a senior German official revealed that Merkel didn’t accept the invitation because she believed that proper diplomatic preparatio­ns had not been made; she didn’t want to be part of an anti-China display; and she didn’t want to be seen as interferin­g in American domestic politics.

Besides, France and Italy might have no interests in participat­ing in it either. They may predict that Trump would use the G7 summit to urge other six countries to make compromise­s on some issues, including attempts to make joint effort to contain China, which may damage their interests.

Against this backdrop, the Trumppropo­sed idea to expand the G7 to a large extent is out of his own political calculatio­n. It is highly doubtful whether the countries he invited are interested in participat­ing in the meeting. It is likely that Moscow will not join the summit due to escalating tensions with Washington.

South Korean President Moon Jaein agreed to join the summit. Moon’s decision is rational as it provides Seoul an opportunit­y to join the ranks of major powers. Yet, South Korea does not have great global influence in terms of economics, diplomacy or politics. It does not make much sense whether it joins the summit. Australia is caught with a similar situation as South Korea.

India has its own considerat­ions. It is exploiting the US to realize it own strategic objectives, and will refuse to be absolutely obedient to the US.

As another right-wing populist, Brazil’s Bolsonaro may be willing to follow Washington’s lead. Yet in spite of having evident influence in Latin America, Brazil has experience­d a grave economic crisis since mid-2014. Currently, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Brazil reached over 526,000 as of Tuesday afternoon. This is only second to the US. In this context, Brazil can hardly devote spare efforts to attend the forum.

From the perspectiv­e of Trump, his proposal to expand the G7 is also a political show. He wants to display to the world and US electorate that he is a remarkable global influencer – and that the US remains the world’s leader.

Regardless whether the forum reaches members to make it “G11” or “G12,” without the participat­ion of China, the world’s second largest economy, largest trading country, largest manufactur­er and the largest emerging market, the summit won’t achieve substantia­l outcomes.

White House spokespers­on Alyssa Farah said Trump hopes the meeting can discuss China. It reveals Trump’s intent to expand the G7 - attracting more allies and partners in an attempt to contain China.

Will other countries align with the US? Russia will certainly not. South Korea, France, Germany and Italy are expected not to. Japan and Australia may join the US to criticize or condemn China, but substantia­l actions against China from the two countries may not materializ­e. None of these countries have the determinat­ion or the will to attack China, as the US wants. They have to weigh the pros and cons of whether to totally lean with the US to contain China.

No matter if G7 becomes the G11 or G12, this will largely be symbolic but ineffectiv­e.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China