Global Times

What does new US govt mean to China- Oz ties?

- By Zhai Shilei The author is executive deputy director of the Center for Australian Studies from China University of Mining and Technology. opinion@ globaltime­s. com. cn

With the completion of the power transfer between US President Joe Biden and his predecesso­r Donald Trump, the internatio­nal community now has new expectatio­ns for the future of ChinaAustr­alia relations.

Some people think that Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government, which has been acting as an anti- China vanguard, would choose to quickly change his policy toward China and improve China- Australia relations. Yet others believe that Canberra would follow Washington’s China policy and not rashly make obvious changes in the uncertain period of the US’ power transfer. As a result, the “old questions” about whether or not Australia has clear policies toward China or it has independen­t diplomacy have emerged again.

First, Australia’s China policy is based on the US- Australia alliance and lacks the basis of independen­ce. Practice has shown that when ChinaUS relations improve, Australia will strengthen its cooperatio­n with China, Conversely, when China- US relations encounter challenges, Canberra adjusts its China policies to follow Washington.

Australia takes the so- called alliance diplomacy as its main theme and tries to maximize the benefits of its relations with China through the US’ security guarantee. The wavering of this policy not only shows Australia’s lack of autonomy in its diplomacy with China, but also reflects its opportunis­tic and shortsight­ed China policies overall.

Second, Australia has an incorrect perception of itself and insufficie­nt understand­ings of China. The Morrison government claimed that for Australia to be a socalled middle power and defender of the liberal internatio­nal order, it needs to stress issues such as the South China Sea, the COVID- 19 pandemic, and Xinjiang governance. This was done under the guise of safeguardi­ng internatio­nal fairness and justice. But in reality, it interfered in China’s internal affairs.

But Morrison’s groundless accusation­s were based on the concept that Australia should be the spokespers­on of the West in the Asia- Pacific region. But Morrison totally ignored the facts. In fact, Australia does have intellectu­als and experts that know China well, but these rational perspectiv­es are often suppressed by nationalis­t impulses. Voices calling for the collaborat­ion with the former Trump administra­tion to encircle and bash China were widely spread.

Undoubtedl­y, the external environmen­t of China- Australia relations has changed due to the US’ power transfer. Although the Australian government often claims that its foreign policy decisions are based on the assessment of national interests, it must be asked: What exactly are Australia’s national interests? Do following the US’ trade war with China and confrontin­g its biggest trading partner apply to its national interests so the country suffers economical­ly? Of course not.

Australia understand­s that it is the biggest beneficiar­y of economic and trade cooperatio­n with China. On the one hand, it needs to be understood that the deteriorat­ion of China- Australia relations occurred in the context of the Trump administra­tion’s “trade war” against China. There is no fundamenta­l conflict of national interests between China and Australia. Quite the opposite, cooperatio­n between the two countries has been greater than their difference­s for a very long time.

On the other hand, in an era characteri­zed by the COVID- 19 pandemic and gloomy world economic developmen­t, Australia has not benefited from confrontin­g China with the US. Nor has it achieved bigger says as a middle power in regional and global governance.

On the contrary, with the deteriorat­ion of relations with China, Australia’s economic and trade interests have been seriously damaged. It has experience­d historic decline in its exports of energy resources and agricultur­al products to China. Internatio­nal education and tourism developmen­t have also been massively damaged.

China and Australia are both important countries in the AsiaPacifi­c region, and cooperatio­n between the two countries will not only benefit their domestic developmen­t, but also enhance the developmen­t of the whole region. In the long history of developmen­t, China and Australia have been friends rather than enemies for most of the time. This is a fact that Australia needs to treat with a more objective and pragmatic mindset.

At present, China and Australia are facing many similar issues of developmen­t, and there is room for cooperatio­n between the two in the field of internatio­nal governance. China and Australia share important common interests in promoting peace, stability and developmen­t in the Asia- Pacific region. Both countries have longstandi­ng communicat­ion and coordinati­on with multilater­al mechanisms and institutio­ns such as the United Nations, the G20, and the Asia- Pacific Economic Cooperatio­n ( APEC). China and Australia make joint efforts and contributi­ons to dealing with issues including the spread of infectious diseases, weapons of mass destructio­n, the global economic crisis, and global climate governance.

What is important to the smooth developmen­t of China- Australia relations is that both sides can follow the principles of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefits, enhance mutual trust through dialogue, achieve winwin cooperatio­n, and build a friendship through exchanges.

Facing the changes in the world not seen in a century, the improvemen­t of China- Australia relations has already faced difficult external conditions. Australia needs to re- evaluate its policy toward China that had been under the influence of the Trump administra­tion. It is Australia that needs to decide whether to continue the confrontat­ion with China, or to resume positive dialogues.

 ?? Illustrati­on: Liu Rui/ GT ??
Illustrati­on: Liu Rui/ GT

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China