Global Times

Progress of China-US talks on AI hinges on if US has right mind-set

-

In the evolving landscape of internatio­nal relations, the collaborat­ion between the US and China in the realm of Artificial Intelligen­ce (AI) technology, particular­ly with an emphasis on security concerns, emerges as a critical juncture that could significan­tly influence the stability of China-US ties. This issue gained prominence in November of last year when, during a landmark meeting in California, President Xi Jinping and President Joe Biden heralded the inception of new bilateral channels for consultati­on on AI.

This initiative was further highlighte­d in remarks by Arati Prabhakar, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and chief science advisor, who disclosed forthcomin­g plans for the US to engage with China on AI system security, as reported by the Financial Times.

The main challenge in this effort is the US’ dualistic approach, which views the developmen­t of Chinese AI technology as a significan­t threat from its No.1 adversary. The US attempts to restrict high-tech access to China in this field while also working to establish a bilateral consultati­on mechanism. The US has imposed export restrictio­ns on high-end chips to China in order to control the transfer of technology and prevent the use of America’s advanced GPU by Chinese technology companies.

Furthermor­e, the US has rallied its allies, notably those within the Five Eyes alliance, to establish a “small circle” for security purposes, exerting pressure on nations such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE to avoid deploying Huawei’s 5G and AI technologi­es. These actions, ostensibly taken under the banner of national security, have transcende­d their stated purpose, disrupting the global economic and technologi­cal developmen­t landscape.

Using its technologi­cal and financial power and dominant position, the US presents security concerns as a convenient excuse to maximize profitabil­ity in global markets. It’s a total zero-sum game principle.

The restrictio­n on the export of AI technology and chips to China, ostensibly to prevent their deployment in military equipment – which is purported to augment the Chinese military’s offensive capabiliti­es – stands in stark contrast to the extensive use of this technology by the US in its military domain. This includes its utilizatio­n to underscore military superiorit­y and simulate military conflicts in the Taiwan Straits, actions that serve to heighten tensions in China’s periphery.

At the heart of the discourse on AI security lies a fundamenta­l question: Whose security is truly at stake – humanity’s or America’s? A clear delineatio­n of this issue is paramount for advancing China-US discussion­s on AI security.

An initial step toward progress would involve both nations reaching a consensus on addressing the perils posed by AI applicatio­ns, potentiall­y setting the stage for negotiatio­ns concerning their use in attacks on nuclear command and control networks, given the global imperative for AI security management.

As a significan­t player in the AI technology arena and one of the fastest-growing in the global AI technology landscape, China’s engagement in consultati­ons with the US reflects a responsibl­e stance.

However, China is not merely a follower in the AI technologi­cal race; it presents a formidable challenge. The manner in which the US responds to the prospect of being outpaced in certain domains will be pivotal in approachin­g these consultati­ons with the appropriat­e mind-set.

If the US negotiates with China based on what is more conducive to maintainin­g its hegemonic position, such negotiatio­ns will not be successful.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China