Global Times

US’ continenta­l shelf claim typical act of hegemony: Chinese FM

- Global Times Page Editor: liucaiyu@globaltime­s.com.cn

The US unilateral­ly establishi­ng outer limits of continenta­l shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the coast is a typical act of unilateral­ism and hegemonism, a spokespers­on for Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Tuesday.

Wang Wenbin said that the delimitati­on rules of the continenta­l shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the coast were set in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), not customary internatio­nal law. The US is not a state party to UNCLOS and has no right to claim extended continenta­l shelf based on UNCLOS or review its extended continenta­l shelf outer limits through the Commission on the Limits of the Continenta­l Shelf.

The US’ unilateral claim is illegal, null and void. It seriously violates internatio­nal law, encroaches on the internatio­nal seabed which is the common heritage of mankind, undermines the overall interests of the internatio­nal community and will not be recognized by the internatio­nal community, Wang noted.

It once again reveals the hegemonism and utilitaria­nism that define the thinking and behavior of the US and its selective approach to internatio­nal law, the spokespers­on stressed.

According to the US Department of State in its announceme­nt in late 2023, the US ECS area is approximat­ely one million square kilometers spread across seven regions. This maritime zone holds many resources including corals, crabs and vital habitats for marine life.

Even though the US State Department cites UNCLOS provisions in its announceme­nt, Washington has never signed or ratified the Convention following its adoption by the UN in 1982.

Russia has also voiced objection to US unilateral claims. Citing Grigory Karasin, head of the foreign affairs committee of Russia’s upper house of parliament, Sputnik said that “Unilateral expansion of borders in the Arctic is unacceptab­le and can only lead to increased tension. It is necessary, first of all, to prove the geological affiliatio­n of these territorie­s, just as Russia did.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China