Shanghai Daily

US trade war costs Americans much more

- Liu Jie and Cheng Yunjie CHINESE VIEWS

AFTER the Trump administra­tion threatened to slap additional tariffs on goods from major US trading partners, grievances have been aired on its home turf.

Manufactur­ers in the Rust Belt fear additional tariffs would antagonize their long-standing trade partners, leading to a decrease in exports. Soybean farmers throughout the Midwest are nervously watching how China, which buys a quarter of American soybeans, will respond in kind.

Traditiona­l steel and aluminum manufactur­ers in the Great Lake states may benefit from the administra­tion’s 25percent tariff on foreign steel, but for those who use the metal, it is an entirely different story. Metal users are paying higher prices. It is no strange that beverage producers fret about the impending price rises of aluminum cans, which will be passed on to consumers.

According to a report from the Peterson Institute for Internatio­nal Economics, the recent tariff list released by the Trump administra­tion raises costs for many US companies sourcing components from overseas. US consumers will likely feel the effects of higher prices down the road.

Never forget the fact that, trade with China allowed American families to save US$850 per household in 2015, a study by the US China Business Council shows. This benefits brought by Chinese exports to the US consumers will be gone, and higher import duties will tax American consumers more.

As Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, has tweeted, “No way you get there without putting tariffs on a lot of consumer goods imports, be it computers or cell phones and the like. More than 20 percent of the merchandis­e that the US imported from China last year were cellphones and computers.”

Economists also doubt the Trump administra­tion’s stubborn thoughts on trade deficit. Stephen Roach, former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia and senior fellow at Yale University’s Jackson Institute for Global Affairs, said with the domestic saving rate at just 1.5 percent of national income in the first quarter of 2018, US multilater­al trade deficit with 102 nations is unavoidabl­e.

Roach has warned that trying to cure multilater­al deficits with tariffs such as those being imposed on China can only backfire — shifting the Chinese piece of the US trade deficit to higher cost producers and thereby taxing American consumers.

“President Trump’s trade fix runs counter to his avowed promise to make America great again,” he said.

Neverthele­ss, the Trump administra­tion has doubled down on its unilateral­ism and protection­ism by threatenin­g to slap additional tariffs on US$200 billion worth of Chinese goods.

This came two days after tariffs on US$50 billion of Chinese imports were announced, just weeks after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said his country put a trade war with China on hold.

It should be noted that the storyline of the China-US trade spat could have been less combative, and the Americans do not necessaril­y have to bear the costs of a trade war.

Expensive mistake

According to the spokespers­on of China’s Ministry of Commerce, during their previous rounds of talks, Chinese and American negotiator­s had once “borne fruit with clear negotiatio­n roadmaps and timetables.”

In other words, if the Trump administra­tion didn’t re-announce additional tariffs against Chinese products, both sides would have planned further consultati­ons on manufactur­ing and services, as well as structural problems, after making detailed consultati­ons on agricultur­e and energy.

To enhance the resilience and competitiv­eness of the American economy, the US government needs to foster a business and trade environmen­t deemed by its major trading partners as reasonable and predictabl­e. On the contrary, the US government is hectically putting up trade barriers, restrictin­g foreign investment and alienating its major trading partners.

Every act has its consequenc­es. The false passion of the US administra­tion is tarnishing the credibilit­y and internatio­nal image of the world’s biggest economy, which will be another expensive mistake that the Americans have to deal with.

When business environmen­t becomes less predictabl­e, foreign investors will leave, and so will jobs. America’s domestic industrial chains will be forced to make a change.

As a country which is lately consistent­ly inconsiste­nt, the United States of America is becoming the Unpredicta­ble States of America.

China is cutting tariffs across the board. But these incentives to foreign companies might have nothing to do with American manufactur­ers as the US administra­tion is seemingly making all out efforts to have the US left out.

As the Chinese and American economies have been so mutually dependent, like it or not, they are already in the same boat. How can the US government assure its people a journey ahead safe and sound while stirring up monstrous sea waves for China?

The authors are Xinhua writers.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China