Robots: Allies during virus crisis, enemies later?
WHEN human contact needs to be kept to a minimum, robots can save lives and factories. But when the novel coronavirus crisis is over, will they amplify job losses?
It may be a mechanized arm pulling beers in a Seville bar, a dog-like dispenser of hand sanitiser in a Bangkok mall, a cooler on wheels that delivers groceries in Washington, or a vaguely humanoid greeter at a Belgian hospital that also checks you are not running a fever.
These are some of the new jobs that robots have taken on as lockdown measures have seen humans confined to their homes.
Resistance falls away
“The moment there is a threat for humans, you should send a robot,” said Cyril Kabbara, cofounder of the French startup Sharks Robotics.
Its robot Colossus helped save Paris’ Notre Dame Cathedral when flames engulfed its roof in 2019, and has been adapted to help remove lead that contaminated the site.
“Four or five years ago, when we were presented the Colossus, they laughed at us. The firefighters said: ‘These guys are going to take away our jobs’,” said the entrepreneur.
But the Colossus has since been successfully integrated into the Paris and Marseille fire services. “The more we advance, the more the resistance falls away,” he said.
It is not just in the hygiene and medical spheres where robots have made advances.
“This crisis has demonstrated that you have to have a capacity to continue activity even when a health or another type of crisis strikes,” said Kabbara.
“We’ve had quite a few manufacturers tell us that the robots allowed them to continue operating. And if they hadn't had them, they’d be at a dead stop.”
While owners like robots as they can keep operations running, workers can see them as a risk to their jobs.
Rightly so, according
to
Brookings Institution researcher Mark Muro.
“Recent research suggests that the deepening recession is likely to bring a surge of laborreplacing automation,” he said in a recent note for the Economist Intelligence Unit.
“People who suggest that automation is not taking away jobs in manufacturing, they’re just wrong,” said Oxford University economist Carl Frey.
“Historically, technology has created a lot of jobs as well, but you see less of that happening in the digital world,” said Frey.
He pointed to automakers or manufacturers like General
Electric still employing many workers even after adopting automation.
“The leading techs of today are not creating so many jobs, apart from Amazon,” he said.
No one safe?
With the rapid progress made in artificial intelligence, white collar workers are increasingly at risk from automation, experts warn.
“No group of workers may be entirely immune this time around,” said Muro.
That is not to say that high levels of automation cannot coexist with low unemployment. Singapore and South Korea are at the top of the rankings for deployment of robots compared to the size of the workforce and yet they enjoy low unemployment.
Nevertheless, Frey warns of rising anxiety about robots stealing jobs once the immediate fear of the coronavirus recedes.
But he doubts a worldwide movement against automation will gain traction as job losses are a local phenomenon and tend to happen in regions that have long suffered from manufacturing jobs disappearing.
(AFP)