Stone amplifies opposition to US base
But film director’s signing of petition will have little effect, analysts say
Hollywood director Oliver Stone’s scathing comments about Japan’s leaders being too “gutless” to stand up to the US over its usage of Okinawa to build military facilities have cast the spotlight on local and international opposition to construction of a new base.
But while the support of the Oscar-winning director may lead to headlines and raise awareness about the resistance of the Okinawan people toward the US military’s presence, analysts expect that opposition to the new base will have little effect given the overriding security interests of Tokyo and Washington.
Around 30,000 US military personnel are stationed in Okinawa, which accounts for around 1 per cent of Japan’s land mass but holds about 70 per cent of all US troops in the country.
Stone gave his criticism in an interview published in the Asahi newspaper on May 7, discussing his decision to sign a petition in January opposing the construction of a new US military base in the waters off Henoko, in the northeast of Okinawa.
Stone, who served as an infantryman in the Vietnam war and subsequently directed films such as Platoon, said in the interview that after visiting the prefecture: “I felt like Okinawa was a colony.
“I saw that people were upset about the environmental damage that was being done, but they didn’t seem to have any power to stop it. I even get the impression that Japan remains a satellite country that dutifully does the US’ bidding.”
Stone cited a survey showing as many as 70 per cent of Okinawans opposed the new base but said they and the local government were overruled by Tokyo, which was a “slap in the face of the democratic movement”.
“Your Japanese leaders are gutless. They’ve always been gutless. They haven’t fought for real sovereignty, for that matter.”
Hiromi Murakami, a political-science professor at the Tokyo campus of Temple University, said: “The debate over US forces on Okinawa has gone on since the end of the war and yes, having a famous director sign the petition and then speak about the issue is going to attract attention, but it is not going to change anything.”
“Having US troops in Okinawa is part of Japan’s national defence strategy and that location is obviously critical to that,” Murakami said, pointing to the proximity of Taiwan and growing international concern over potential Chinese aggression across the Taiwan Strait.
US land, sea and air forces in Okinawa are in part designed to counter that threat, as well as dangers posed by North Korea.
“The other reason why the bases will largely remain in Okinawa is because they have been there since the end of the war in 1945, so moving them anywhere else in Japan would be very expensive and, perhaps most importantly, no other prefecture in Japan wants to host those bases,” Murakami said.
She pointed out that hundreds of thousands of Okinawans took to the streets in 1995 after three US servicemen abducted, raped and then left a 12-year-old girl for dead, but even that horrific incident was not enough for the government to order the US military out of the prefecture.
In comparison, she said, a petition was unlikely to make any impact on government policy.
Ben Ascione, an assistant professor of international relations at Tokyo’s Waseda University, agreed that Okinawa was “strategically convenient” for both the US and Japan as they looked to counter threats in the region.
“Okinawa is strategically located near a number of potential regional flashpoints, including Taiwan, the disputed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea and it is not far from the Korean peninsula,” said Ascione, using the Japanese name for islands that Beijing claims and refers to as the Diaoyu archipelago.
“It is strategically convenient for the US to have facilities there as it is closer than Guam or any of the other US bases in the Pacific. The debate over the burden the bases place on the prefecture has gone on for many years, but the question for the US and Japan is how effective their forces would be if the bases were not there.”
While some reports have suggested that locals are becoming more accepting of the US military presence due to the increased threat of both China and Russia towards Japan, Shinako Oka, an activist for Okinawan independence, insists that opposition to the bases is growing.
“I also supported the petition and I believe it is a good initiative as it shows that it is not only the people of Okinawa who are opposed to the bases, but people from around the world who support this campaign,” she said.
“It shows that this is not just a political or security issue; it is also a human rights matter.”
Other notable signatories to the petition include Okinawa governor Denny Tamaki, Mairead Maguire, a Nobel Peace laureate from Northern Ireland, US filmmaker Michael Moore and Professor Noam Chomsky.
Your Japanese leaders are gutless. They’ve always been gutless
OLIVER STONE