The World of Chinese

SEVERANCE PAYS

时间就是金钱,速度就是生产力

- BY LIU JUE (刘珏) DR. YE ZHUSHENG, LAW PROFESSOR AT THE LAW SCHOOL OF THE SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Even by Chinese standards, it was an eye-opening figure. This March, in the small village of Jiangbei, Jiangsu province, some 160 couples filed for divorce at the same time. But this wasn’t some outbreak of marital discord—the couples, some in their 80s, were merely taking advantage of the fine print in proposals to redevelop their village as a “high-tech developmen­t zone.”

Jiangbei’s homeowners all faced compulsory demolition and relocation to local government-built housing— but single residents could qualify for more property, plus around 131,000 RMB (19,000 USD) extra in compensati­on, compared to married couples. Hence the rush to “divorce”—as one villager told the Nanjing Morning Post, “Everybody is doing this. We’ll deal with the consequenc­es later.” Local divorce attorneys soon began to charge triple their usual fee of 5,000 RMB.

Experts warn that the local government may not honor the extra payouts if couples are found to be exploiting loopholes by, for example, remarrying soon after. Others point out that those who do split for financial reasons may end up arguing over the proceeds, and harm their relationsh­ips anyway. These warnings have done little to stop the growing popularity of “fake divorces.”

In August 2016, civil affairs bureaus across Shanghai were flooded by hundreds of couples lining up to part ways because of rumors about an imminent restrictio­n on existing property owners buying more houses. As the real estate market in Shanghai rose an average 5.6 percent in the last week of August, Wind Info, a financial informatio­n service in China, described the phenomenon as like “drinking poison in riotous celebratio­n.”

Some local government­s are finding ways to stymie the scam. Beijing, which requires buyers to pay higher deposits for each home bought after the first one in an attempt to cool its overheated property market, released a policy on March 17 clarifying that anyone who has taken out a mortgage is now considered a property owner. Buyers cannot evade the deposit scheme even if they are divorced and without a house registered in their name.

The practice of fake divorce is not a particular­ly recent one. Back in 2013, a spate of phony separation­s prompted Shanghai’s Minhang

“I'VE SEEN PEOPLE LITERALLY TEAR UP AGREEMENTS BEHIND THEIR PARTNER'S BACK. WHATEVER YOUR INTENTIONS, ONCE YOU GET DIVORCED, IT'S FOR REAL”

District Civil Affairs Bureau to famously put up signs cautioning, “Proceed carefully with divorce due to a risky real estate market.”

And some fake divorces can prove all too real. In March, 44-year-old Beijing resident Mr. Li sued his ex-wife Ms. Wang for the apartments Wang took in her name, after they divorced in order to dodge restrictio­ns on purchasing a third property. But post-divorce, Wang refused to resume the nuptials. These situations have become so recognizab­le that a fake divorce turned real formed the plot of recent hit I Am Not Madam Bovary, which went on to win Best Picture at the Asian Film Awards.

Similar cases spring up every day across the country. We invited two experts to weigh in on the topic of fake divorce, and whether it’s a reasonable move to maximize profit—or a recipe for marital mayhem.

In Chinese, the character for family is “家,” which consists of a roof and a pig underneath. The pig represents an important part of the family’s livelihood. A family therefore signifies people living under the same roof to pursue a prosperous life. The character cleverly combines both spiritual and material elements to form a family. Whoever coined this character, however, never would have expected “fake divorce” to become a trend. In this sense, divorcees give up the spiritual element for material benefit.

To better understand this phenomenon, the first question we must consider is if the policy has affected the stability of marriage.

Though purchasing restrictio­ns have led to some fake divorces, they have not necessaril­y shaken the stability of marriage in general. If a family has only one apartment, many people will be discourage­d from getting divorced. Those in better economic circumstan­ces are more open to the option because, if they own two houses, each can get one after they split. The most important economic concern in a divorce, housing, is removed.

From a long-term point of view, if price-control policies become effective

With “fake divorces” proving a popular loophole for gaming the housing market, we ask experts if these arrangemen­ts guarantee an even split中国式“假离婚”背后的复杂真相

and people no longer purchase houses as investment­s, fewer people will get fake divorces…i’ve read a study that suggests couples are less likely to get divorced during economic depression­s. Does that mean we should actively create recession to strengthen marriages?

From the perspectiv­e of the relationsh­ip, when marriage is no longer a goal but a tool to achieve something else, the institutio­n itself becomes depreciate­d. In fact, marriage is indeed not the ultimate goal. The most restrictiv­e system ensures the lowest divorce rate, but does it mean

Legally, fake divorce carries a very high risk. Once things go south, it’s difficult to protect your rights. After the couple receives the divorce certificat­e, or the divorce mediation from the court, the marriage is dissolved. Neither the court nor the Bureau of Civil Affairs will investigat­e your intentions, no matter what they are.

Legally, there’s no such thing as a “fake divorce.” Even if it surfaces afterwards that the arrangemen­t was to evade debt, emigrate abroad, or for the sake of children’s education, the certificat­e and mediation won’t be cancelled. The terminatio­n of the relationsh­ip cannot be mandatoril­y reversed, which is to say: The law can’t force the two parties to resume marriage.

There was a regulation that allowed the Bureau of Civil Affairs people are blessed with happier lives? Of course not. Therefore, stable marriages are advocated but it doesn’t mean all policy should be designed around that aim.

Secondly, there are all kinds of factors to consider when it comes to marriage, and policy is just another one of these. Fake divorcees are criticized because they choose financial benefit over relationsh­ips, but it’s only human nature to seek benefits, which is beyond reproach. Let’s not forget that the fake divorce is a decision made by both parties. To provide for one’s family is considered to withdraw a divorce certificat­e if it was found to be obtained under false pretenses, and declare the divorce invalid. But this rule has since been struck down.

Secondly, the property division agreement of a fake divorce is difficult to overturn legally. There’s always a lack of evidence needed to do so.

According to the judicial interpreta­tion given by the Supreme People’s Court regarding the Marriage Law, [divorce] agreements can only be voided if there proves to be coercion and fraudulenc­e. However, is fake divorce fraudulent? There’s dispute in judicial practice. In some cases, the court has decided that the property can be redistribu­ted because there was no real intention [to divorce]. But in other cases, courts have confirmed the original agreement because fake divorce is not considered fraud. more important than the marriage per se. Others may get divorced because of exceptiona­l circumstan­ces (bankruptcy, debts etc.) to protect the other party. This does not devalue their marriage; instead, it shows the strength of the relationsh­ip.

Faced with the same restrictio­ns policy, some couples are unmoved; others are willing to get a fake divorce, which means giving up the legal protection of their union. As long as they are clear-headed making these choices and willing to take responsibi­lity, no one should be blamed for their actions.

Obviously, unfair agreements can be voided according to civic laws and the Contract Law, but when it comes to divorce agreements, such requests are not always supported. Mainstream judicial opinion doesn’t consider divorce agreements as entirely equal to financial agreements. With both parties’ emotions, family responsibi­lities, and other issues involved, it’s impossible to decide if such an agreement is fair based solely on property division.

Signing a supplement­ary agreement to the divorce arrangemen­ts is a way to protect your rights, but in reality, most people have no notion of doing this, because they haven’t realized the full risk of a fake divorce. Even if you did sign one, I’ve see people literally tear them up behind their partner’s back once they are divorced.

Whatever your best intentions, once you get divorced, it’s for real. And you can’t force the other party to remarry. If that’s a consequenc­e you are unable to bear, do not say yes to a fake divorce.

WU JIEZHEN, DIRECTOR OF THE MARRIAGE AND FAMILY LAW DEPARTMENT, F&P LAW FIRM

Time is life,” observed the renowned 20th-century writer, translator and educator Liang Shiqiu. “It is most startling to hear a watch or clock clicking away the seconds, each click indicating the shortening of one’s life little by little.” For modern people, life is much like a battle against time. It seems that an invisible power urges us to do

everything quicker, hastier, faster: more “快”( ku3i, quick; fast; rapid; swift).

The character is commonly used to describe speed. The frequently used term for “courier” is 快递 ( ku3id#) meaning “express delivery;” 快餐 ( ku3ic`n) is “fast food;” and快车( ku3ich8) is an express train or bus. Meanwhile, 动作快 ( d7ngzu7 ku3i) is to “act quickly” and 说话快 ( shu4hu3 ku3i) means “fast talking.” Based on this, a quick worker is called 快手( ku3ish6u), literally translated as “fast hand”—it’s also the name of a popular live-streaming app (see feature, page 32). For example: Liu is such a quick and neat worker that he is known as “Fast Hand Liu.” However, when it comes to 快嘴 ( ku3izu@, fast mouth), this isn’t describing someone’s talking speed. Instead, it refers to people who voice their thoughts too readily, or have loose lips—in other words, a gossip.

You may also have heard people say脑子快( n2ozi ku3i, “the brain is fast”). It means “quick-witted, clever, and nimble.” The term眼疾手快( y2nj! sh6uku3i, literally, “quick of eye and deft of hand”) is often used to describe fast reflexes.

If you want to express that you are “doing something at top speed”, you can turn to the idiom 快马加鞭 ( ku3im2 ji`bi`n, spurring on the fast horse). For个星期,我们要快马加鞭,按期完成任务。( Z3i zh-zu#h7u y! g- x~ngq~, w6men y3o ku3im2 ji`bi`n, 3nq~ w1nch9ng r-nw&. In the final week, we must “spur on the fast horse” and finish the project on time).

In some other cases, 快 also indicates a future tense, meaning “soon” or “before long.” For example, you can say :我快要五十岁了。( W6 ku3iy3o w^sh! su# le. I am about to be 50.)

Another meaning of 快 is “sharp; keen.” A sharp knife is 快刀 ( ku3id`o). A Chinese saying states that “快刀斩乱麻”( ku3id`o zh2n lu3nm1), which can be translated as “cut a tangled skein of jute with a sharp knife.” This old-fangled pearl of wisdom means that one should be resolute and take prompt measures in order to solve a complex problem.

But 快 didn’t always have these keen connotatio­ns. Its original meaning was “pleased, happy, satisfied.” As a pictophone­tic character—where one component carries the meaning and another the sound—its radical忄, a simplified version of 心 ( x~n, heart), indicates that 快 is an emotion-related word. Many two-character words containing 快have this meaning, such as 快乐 ( ku3il-, happy), 快活 ( ku3ihuo, jolly, merry, cheerful), or 快感 ( ku3ig2n, apleasant sensation or delight). There is also the literary expression­快事 ( ku3ish#), meaning “an occurrence that gives great satisfacti­on or pleasure.” For instance, 他乡遇故知,实乃人生一大快事!( T` xi`ng y& g&zh~, sh!n2i r9nsh8ng y! d3 ku3ish#! It is such a delight in life to encounter an old friend in a distant land!)

In this meaning, being served a sneak peak or trailer of a film is 先睹为快( xi`n d^ w9i ku3i, consider it a pleasure to be among the first to read or see); hurting oneself will lead to 亲痛仇快( q~nt7ng ch5uku3i, sadden one’s close friends and gladden one’s enemies); when virtue is rewarded it 大快人心( d3ku3i r9nx~n, gladdens the people’s hearts). The most interestin­g use of this exists in the word快婿 ( ku3ix&). With 婿 ( x&) meaning son-inlaw, the word refers to an ideal match for one’s daughter.

When the character is used to depict a personalit­y, 快 means “straightfo­rward, forthright, and plainspoke­n,” as seen in words like 爽快 ( shu2ngkuai, straightfo­rward and outspoken).

Here we have the phrase 快人快语( ku3ir9n ku3iy^), meaning “straightfo­rward talk from a straightfo­rward person,” which is usually used to flatter people face-to-face: “您快人快语!跟您聊天真是痛快”( N!n ku3ir9n ku3iy^! G8n n!n li1oti`n zh-nshi t7ngku3i! You are such a straightfo­rward person, talking straightfo­rwardly! It’s such a pleasure to talk with you!)

Last but not least, sometimes 快 is also a noun. In ancient times, a sheriff was called捕快 ( b^ku3i), referring to a constable who caught criminals. But this word is no longer used for policemen in modern society. What do people call the cops now? That’s a lesson for another day.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China