Financial Mirror (Cyprus)

As the bloc fragments, member states will become less committed to collective security

- By Kamran Bokhari

The effect of the European Union’s meltdown on NATO is a critical issue. Already in search of relevance for over a generation, NATO has been rendered all the more incoherent given that European nations are increasing­ly disillusio­ned with the EU. With the Continent facing the aftermath of Brexit and a banking crisis that has spread from Italy to Germany, having major European powers actively involved in NATO is becoming even less likely. And a NATO with decreasing input from European states is good news for Russia.

The 2016 NATO summit in Warsaw took place at a time when Europe is in growing disarray. It was only a couple of weeks ago that Britain voted in favor of leaving the EU. While it is trying to manage the fallout from Brexit, the EU is facing major challenges from the Italian banking crisis, which has spread to the financial institutio­ns of Germany, the EU’s economic powerhouse. We recently published a Deep Dive on how NATO has been slowly unravellin­g – a process that is likely to gain momentum given that the political architectu­re of Europe is devolving back to the way it was in the days when NATO was founded.

The lack of a clear mission has plagued NATO since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. Since then, NATO’s European member states have been less and less inclined to bear the costs of collective security. Considerin­g Europe’s current massive financial constraint­s, there is even less incentive to do so. Well before the EU crisis reached its current alarming level, Germany, the mainstay of the EU, was trying to balance between Russia and the West, and this added to the dissonance within the Western camp over how to deal with Russia.

But now that the Germans are not only facing an exporters’ crisis but also an impending bank crisis, NATO’s security interests are even less of a priority.

There are indeed reports that Germany is trying to increase defense spending and its security role in Europe. However, Berlin’s growing financial strain is likely to prevent the Germans from realizing this objective. Another way to look at this is that if the Germans and the other founding EU members have conceded that the EU’s role will be more limited, they are less likely to worry about the fate of NATO.

The disagreeme­nts among the Europeans over how to deal with the financial crisis will exacerbate the discord over NATO between EU member states and between the EU and the U.S. Germany’s unwillingn­ess to help bail out financiall­y distressed southern European countries parallels the attitude of Europe’s major players toward providing for the security of European states along the Russian periphery.

Despite being given some assurances, including troops stationed in Eastern Europe and the provision of military

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cyprus