Financial Mirror (Cyprus)

Doubling down on European energy efficiency

-

At the COP21 conference in Paris last December, world leaders made a binding pledge to set national targets, including energy-efficiency benchmarks, for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions. Now, the European Commission is nearing a moment of truth: Will it set ambitious but attainable energy efficiency targets that will force individual­s and industry to make real changes? Or will it bend to political pressure and set meaningles­s targets that will be reached anyway, with no any additional effort?

The latter approach was taken in 2014, when European leaders agreed to improve energy efficiency by 27% before 2030. The European Council was applauded at the time for its leadership. Nobody bothered to mention that global energy efficiency was already likely to increase by around 35% on its own by 2030.

The COP21 agreement has given Europe a second chance to set an example and become the global standard-bearer for energy efficiency. Environmen­talists, business leaders, and academics are awaiting new targets from the European Commission, which will most likely be establishe­d in October, in a forthcomin­g revision to the Commission’s Energy Efficiency Directive.

So, what would be a meaningful target? If European leaders are serious about their COP21 commitment, they should embrace a 70% reduction on 2010 consumptio­n levels by 2030 – more than double the European Council’s 2014 target.

A 70% reduction is ambitious, but not impossible. There is both an economic and an environmen­tal case to be made for it. Economical­ly, countries that reduce energy consumptio­n also increase productivi­ty, simply because using less energy costs less money. While implementi­ng energy-efficiency measures may require heavy initial investment­s, these outlays will be offset by future productivi­ty growth, which is the only way developed countries can sustainabl­y improve living standards over time.

The environmen­tal argument for an ambitious target is not that we need to “save the Earth.” But we do need to save the climate in which humans have evolved and prospered. Energy efficiency around the world is increasing at roughly 1.5% per year, which is a welcome developmen­t and a sign that 30 years of forward-leaning environmen­tal policies have had some effect. Global energy consumptio­n, however, is rising at around 3% per year, implying that we’re still digging our hole deeper, rather than filling it in.

Six of the world’s largest economies – China, the United States, Russia, India, Japan, and the European Union – remain the biggest polluters. But most growth today comes from developing countries that now participat­e in the global economy. Even if these countries make significan­t strides in reducing emissions, they will be the polluters of the future, at least in the near term.

Globalisat­ion has increased life expectancy and improved living standards in many poor countries. But it also poses new environmen­tal problems that will require ambitious solutions. Seen in this light, a 70% improvemen­t in energy efficiency is the minimum Europe – and the world – can aim for to reach real sustainabi­lity at current levels of global growth.

Fortunatel­y, this is all within our grasp. A 2015 study published by Ecofys, Quintel Intelligen­ce, and the Lisbon Council concluded that Europe already has the technologi­es available to double current energy-efficiency levels without sacrificin­g economic growth. These include heat pumps, smart grids, LED lighting, and energy-efficient household equipment.

So why aren’t these technologi­es being implemente­d already? The reason isn’t that industry is holding Europe back; on the contrary, European industry’s environmen­tal footprint has improved considerab­ly in recent years. Rather, the principal energy consumer in Europe is individual households, where energy efficiency can be tripled in the coming years with the right political leadership, sufficient investment, and long-term commitment from Europeans themselves.

This takes us back to the Energy Efficiency Directive, where this work should begin. The European Commission should set “moon-shot” standards that push us to higher achievemen­ts than we once thought possible. If Europe can double its energy efficiency by 2030, Europeans will look back and wonder how they ever lived differentl­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cyprus