Financial Mirror (Cyprus)

In November 2016, even as Donald Trump was winning the presidency, minimum-wage increases passed in Arizona, Colorado, Maine, and Washington by margins of 10-18 percentage points. And this year, initiative­s for democratic reforms are in the process of bei

-

Yes, it all sounds like Trump-era America. But these conditions also prevailed more than a century ago, during the Progressiv­e Era of the early 1900s.

Disgusted by the massive inequaliti­es of the Gilded Age, the first Progressiv­es sought comprehens­ive reform. Changes to the US Constituti­on adopted during this period include the introducti­on of the federal income tax with the Sixteenth Amendment, direct election of senators with the Seventeent­h Amendment, the prohibitio­n of alcohol with the Eighteenth Amendment (some ideas were really bad), and women’s suffrage with the Nineteenth Amendment.

Progressiv­es wanted citizens to rule more directly, overturnin­g a powerful and often corrupt political-industrial complex that had gradually usurped their rights. They championed recall votes as a way to remove leaders and officials serving vested interests rather than citizens. They created direct primary elections, empowering citizens to choose which candidates to nominate, thereby underminin­g the power of party “machines.” And in 1902, Progressiv­es in Oregon won overwhelmi­ngly approval of a ballot measure creating the initiative and referendum processes. Since then, most states have adopted these fundamenta­l democratic processes, enabling citizens to introduce or approve proposed laws or amendments to their state constituti­ons.

As James Fishkin of Stanford has written, “deliberati­ve democracy” has a long history, extending back to the original democracy in Greece in the fifth century, BC. In this model, informed and engaged citizens directly set the agenda for their representa­tives (though not with the Greeks’ narrowly circumscri­bed definition of who is a citizen).

Today, a new generation of progressiv­e federalist­s are leveraging the initiative process to give citizens power over policy. The specifics of how citizens can put measures to a popular vote or require the legislatur­e to address them vary substantia­lly from place to place, but 26 states and hundreds of cities, accounting for more than 70% of the US population, have initiative­s in their governance tool box.

Sometimes initiative­s have created ongoing challenges for elected leaders, as has been the case with California’s Propositio­n 13, which capped state property taxes when it passed in 1978. And sometimes they have addressed frivolous issues, as was the case with a failed attempt in 2016 to require condoms in pornograph­y. But they have also been fundamenta­l to major reforms that have reshaped governance, especially in California. Citizen-based redistrict­ing, open primaries, changes to term limits, majority-vote budgets, a rainy-day fund, and legislativ­e transparen­cy have all been the direct result of civic-minded leaders deploying the initiative process for the public good.

California is not alone. In the last several years, the initiative process has led to redistrict­ing in Arizona, and ranked-choice voting in Maine. In many other states, voters have approved public financing of elections, the adoption and preservati­on of Medicaid expansion, and marijuana legalisati­on. Voter initiative­s in several cities have also resulted in significan­t increases in the minimum wage and other worker benefits. On average, 150-200 initiative measures are on the ballot in states across the US every election year.

Now, leading reformers are seeking to launch a movement to use initiative­s in a more coordinate­d national campaign. The lessons learned from the minimum-wage campaigns show the promise of such an effort. Beginning in mid-2016 in California and Washington, DC, ballot measures to raise minimum wages passed with overwhelmi­ng support. In November 2016, even as Donald Trump was winning the presidency, minimum-wage increases passed in Arizona, Colorado, Maine, and Washington by margins of 10-18 percentage points. Total spending of $25 million (less than was spent on a special election for the House of Representa­tives in Georgia) brought 8.1 million workers in six states a pay raise of over $2.5 billion (growing to more than $20 billion when fully implemente­d).

In November of this year, Maine shocked observers again, when voters there approved Medicaid expansion by 59-41%, overturnin­g five vetoes by Governor Paul LePage of legislativ­e efforts in favour of the expansion. For a total campaign cost of $1.7 million, 89,000 Maine citizens now stand to gain health insurance.

Watch this space. In 2018, initiative­s for democratic reforms – including redistrict­ing, stricter ethics standards, and broader voting rights – are in the process of being qualified across the country. These measures build on a legacy of reforms that have spread across the country over the last few election cycles.

The original Progressiv­es would be proud. It may have taken more than a century, but their effort to ensure that democracy actually works, by putting power in the hands of citizens through the initiative process, created what may be the most powerful reform tool in US history. Let’s hope so.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cyprus