Why there should be no increase to the corporate tax system

Because of this system an important sector of the economy, that of services, was created which for several years has helped to create thousands of jobs but also contributed a lot towards the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

A suggestion was put forward by the government recently to raise the corporate tax rate, but due to the fear of destabilisation, both the organised social groups and the market rushed to reject it. In any case, what could be the arguments in favour or against such a move?

- A major disadvantage is destabilisation and uncertainty being created in the market and among foreign investors. We already had a slight increase in the corporate tax rate in 2013 from 10% to 12.5%.

During that period, we had an increase in the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate from 15% to 19%.

That decision could be justified as it was a commitment through the Memorandum imposed on us by Troika.

A possible new increase through a decision taken entirely by us could have many and negative effects on our economy which has managed to recover through many sacrifices and hard work on the part of the citizens.

One could argue that even after a small increase we would still have a low corporate tax rate, one of the lowest in Europe.

However, the main problem is not the level of the tax rate, but the intention on behalf of the government and the message we send out to the market, that is, that we are willing to change the tax regime due to pressure from foreign parties both within and outside of the European Union.

As mentioned above, our economy has to a great extent been based on this model for decades, while other countries in the European Union (bigger and more developed) are not particularly concerned with the competitiveness of their tax regime, as their economies are based on several other industries. Thus, we should not lose this comparative advantage at this point.

- The main argument in favour of an increase of the corporate tax rate is that it will, to some extent, help us get rid of the stigmatisation of the tax haven status. It is a fact that there has been a lot of slander against our country in recent years, namely regarding the tax haven status but also accusations regarding money laundering issues.

A great deal of effort was exerted to comply with international regulations and to a large extent, we have succeeded. We are certainly on the right track in terms of this issue. I am of the view, however, that the corporate tax rate should not be part of this debate. And on this particular issue, it is a matter for the competent authorities to convey this message abroad in a clearly and convincingly.

- One could also argue that raising the corporate tax rate could contribute to more revenues for the state. But this is not at all certain since a possible destabilisation of the market and departure of foreign companies and investors from Cyprus would affect state revenues negatively.

In my humble opinion, we should only discuss raising corporate tax when there is more dispersion in the productive sectors of the economy.

Right now, our economy is dependent on tourism, manufacturing, and services. When we succeed in effectively developing other sectors such as shipping, education, energy, research, innovation, technology and entrepreneurship, then we could also discuss bringing about increases to our taxation system. Until then it would be better to maintain this comparative advantage that we have had for many years.

The writer is an Associate Professor of Finance at the Cyprus International Institute of Management (CIIM) and Director of the MSc in Financial Services.