Financial Mirror (Cyprus)

Financial deglobaliz­ation must come next

- By Jayati Ghosh Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics at the University of Massachuse­tts Amherst, is a member of the UN SecretaryG­eneral’s High-Level Advisory Board on Effective Multilater­alism.

After four decades of fostering integratio­n through trade and finance, the global economy has begun a painful process of fragmentat­ion. Initially driven by wealthy countries – namely, the United States under former President Donald Trump and the United Kingdom following the Brexit referendum – several geopolitic­al forces have combined to accelerate the shift toward deglobaliz­ation.

The fracturing of global trade could herald the fragmentat­ion of internatio­nal capital markets. COVID-19related lockdowns and closures have disrupted global supply chains and shut down major production centers, most notably in China. Similarly, the war in Ukraine has altered trade routes and forced Western countries to find alternativ­e suppliers of major commoditie­s like oil, gas, wheat, and fertilizer­s. Western-led sanctions on Russia have further impeded trade and sharply increased food and energy prices.

But while global trade could become even more fragmented if major economies adopt protection­ist policies such as border carbon taxes, financial markets remain strongly integrated. Cross-border capital flows are still largely unregulate­d and more volatile than ever. It’s a combinatio­n that is currently proving to be lethal for many low- and middle-income countries.

The liberaliza­tion of capital accounts in these countries in the 1990s has led to large inflows of “hot money”: private financial capital driven not so much by developing countries’ economic outlook as by developed countries’ macroecono­mic policies. In the years following the 2008 global financial crisis, capital flows to emerging and “frontier” markets surged as prolonged monetary expansion by developed countries’ central banks fueled asset bubbles. Financial agents borrowed cheap in dollars and either lent in foreign currency to developing countries or invested in local currency markets. Capital inflows triggered higher interestra­te spreads and currency appreciati­on, making carry trades particular­ly lucrative – at least for a while.

Over the years, the inflows of hot money, often held as reserves and invested in low-return dollar assets, have made emerging and developing economies vulnerable to capital flight. This has had a dampening effect on these countries’ fiscal policies, as rising seigniorag­e costs have stoked fears of credit-rating downgrades. The rapid interest-rate hikes in the US and the European Union have compounded low- and middle-income countries’ external debt burdens, forcing them to raise interest rates even more aggressive­ly than advanced economies and hindering their recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, these dramatic rate hikes have not prevented fickle foreign investors from fleeing, causing emerging-market currencies to depreciate and severely damaging labor markets and growth prospects.

But the developed countries’ combinatio­n of higher interest rates and fiscal consolidat­ion is counterpro­ductive, as it risks causing recessions without addressing the real forces behind surging inflation. As a result of following the US Federal Reserve’s lead, many low- and middle-income countries already face severe stagflatio­n – and integratio­n with global finance is worsening their economic woes.

Instead of mimicking developed countries’ ineffectiv­e approach, developing and emerging countries must introduce policies tailored to their specific needs and political economies. Such policies include controllin­g the prices of key commoditie­s, increasing domestic production to alleviate critical shortages, and ensuring social protection­s for the newly unemployed and those who are worst affected by high inflation.

Above all, developing countries must introduce more effective capital controls. Imposing constraint­s on volatile portfolio flows, particular­ly those that contribute to currency depreciati­on, is crucial to mitigating the risks associated with financial globalizat­ion. Moreover, just as several developing countries have explicitly or implicitly defied the US-led trade sanctions on Russia, policymake­rs must break free from the US-dominated internatio­nal financial system, especially dollar swaps and repo markets.

Given that most developing countries cannot afford to act on their own, regional cooperatio­n is also critical. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Developmen­t’s annual report mentions several innovative forms of finance and exchange payments that Global South countries could implement to counter advanced economies’ financial dominance, including “South-South clearing unions.”

If trade among Global South economies grows quickly, the report notes, the flows will be settled in their own currencies or through regional currency mechanisms. Such mechanisms could also help negotiate debt-restructur­ing deals, provide financial insurance at the regional level, and even establish stabilizat­ion funds to improve countries’ foreign-asset positions.

Financial globalizat­ion was supposed to usher in an era of robust growth and fiscal stability in the developing world. It ended up doing the opposite. Now, to restore their economic viability, low- and middle-income countries must make the most of deglobaliz­ation and embrace the fragmentat­ion of internatio­nal capital markets.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cyprus